⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️

Ok thanks

how to wrap lines in GNOME Builder?

Jolla opens Sailfish OS hardware adaption source code for the Sony Xperia X The now available hardware adaption sources and instructions are targeted at skilled developers to create their own images in order to try out Sailfish OS on Xperia X before official releases, and if possible help Jolla by contributing back to the open sourced HW adaption repositories. With given instructions it should as well be possible to port Sailfish OS to other Sony Open Devices. - Official blog post: https://blog.jolla.com/xperiax-open-source-hw-adaptation/ - Sailfish OS HADK for Xperia X: https://sailfishos.org/wiki/Sailfish_X_Build_and_Flash - IRC #sailfishos-porters: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#sailfishos-porters

Is rpm fusion like non free debian repo?

Sort of. But while Non free Debian is supported by Debian itself, RPM Fusion is third party and not supported by Fedora Project.

Hi guys, how to install mysql , so it was immediately prompted to create a password root

@admins ?

Hi guys, how to install mysql , so it was immediately prompted to create a password root

https://www.linode.com/docs/databases/mysql/how-to-install-mysql-on-centos-6

Sort of. But while Non free Debian is supported by Debian itself, RPM Fusion is third party and not supported by Fedora Project.

This. There's no relation between Fedora and rpmfusion (from a Fedora point of view). They are different things

hi, how can i free size from partition and add it to root partition

hi, how can i free size from partition and add it to root partition

You can't because both are mounted. Maybe there's a way using a live CD (so both partitions are unmounted) but it never worked for me.

You can't because both are mounted. Maybe there's a way using a live CD (so both partitions are unmounted) but it never worked for me.

root partition have 50G, is it enough ?

usually, yes

usually, yes

thanks

thanks

my full system install takes 30GB and there are already tons of docker images included

okay ~10GB are docker images

Very good

root partition have 50G, is it enough ?

With GNOME and lot of libs and tools I still can live with 20GiB

root partition have 50G, is it enough ?

My root is 50G, too, and it's usage is ~8 gigs.

With GNOME and lot of libs and tools I still can live with 20GiB

thank you, i was a little worried about its size

My root is 50G, too, and it's usage is ~8 gigs.

8G ?

8G ?

+

Archlinux: base, base-devel, xfce and lots of other shit.

Iam using Fedora Workstation, and it's usage is 17 G

root partition have 50G, is it enough ?

Works fine for me.

For what it's worth, I usually use 16GiB for / (the root filesystem), 2 * physical RAM for swap (especially on laptops, mainly for hibernation) and the rest as /home. In my experience 16 GiB is plenty.

Arranged as: * root first, primary partition * then an extended partition with the rest of the disk space * in that: * /home * swap -- right at the end

This works well for all distros. The primary/extended/logical drive thing only applies to MBR partitioned hard disks. With GPT hard disk, there are only primary partitions.

16G works only if you're on a lightweight spin and keep your eye on the disk usage a lot

if a nonexperienced user hits full usage of the root partition, it's pretty much a death sentence to the system

For what it's worth, I usually use 16GiB for / (the root filesystem), 2 * physical RAM for swap (especially on laptops, mainly for hibernation) and the rest as /home. In my experience 16 GiB is plenty.

My / is usually 40G.

And i never do swap if possible

That seems a lot to me. I have 4-to-5-year-old installs of Ubuntu in 16GB partitions which have been upgraded through every version in between and are still working fine, usually with the partition about 50% full.

NB this is with a separate /home partition, though, _always_.

F27 Workstation, with a separate /home partition and just a bunch of development tools installed: 21G Used on /

and you need quite a lot of space for update and (eventually) upgrade RPMs

That seems a lot to me. I have 4-to-5-year-old installs of Ubuntu in 16GB partitions which have been upgraded through every version in between and are still working fine, usually with the partition about 50% full.

It is a lot

Buuut

F27 Workstation, with a separate /home partition and just a bunch of development tools installed: 21G Used on /

Hang on, I thought F27 wasn't even out yet?

Hang on, I thought F27 wasn't even out yet?

Hes using branched.

it's not

I am curious... Does the beta version use more disk space than the final release?

no

That is a big OS. ? What extras do you have installed, may I ask?

qt5 development libraries, mostly; some debuginfo packages

also some apps i use, like spotify (flatpak) and a few KDE apps

anyway, i was just trying to make the point that the installer suggests you to go with a 50GB / partition, which is perfectly sensible for a regular user and it may not even be enough for some use cases

i would definitely not go for less

I am taken aback. OK, I retract my comments about size then!

And i never do swap if possible

How much ram do you have

Swap is pretty useful for suspend on disk

Swap is pretty useful for suspend on disk

Exactly. That is what I meant when I said it was mainly for hibernation -- and I only use that on notebooks/laptops.

How much ram do you have

16gb/24gb on most machines - but even my tablet with 4g is doing very fine with running fedora

16gb/24gb on most machines - but even my tablet with 4g is doing very fine with running fedora

This mighrt explain something. I do not own a machine with as much as 16GB of RAM, either at home or at work. My laptops have 4-6-8GB and my biggest personal server has 12GB.

16gb/24gb on most machines - but even my tablet with 4g is doing very fine with running fedora

Certainly, you don’t need any swap.

Certainly, you don’t need any swap.

I actually have one machine with swap enabled

I hibernate a lot

I hibernate a lot

You have no troubles with state restoring?

I have no swap, I hibernate, I don't face any problems there

I have no swap, I hibernate, I don't face any problems there

Hibernate or suspend?

Hibernate or suspend?

Hint: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Power_management/Suspend_and_hibernate#Hibernation

Hibernate or suspend?

Suspending works pretty well, but hibernation isn't. All data restored and then everything freezes. Only reboot helps.

You have no troubles with state restoring?

No, it works.

Can anyone please tell me, Is there any difference between shell of ubuntu and fedora?

Can anyone please tell me, Is there any difference between shell of ubuntu and fedora?

Are you talking about the bash shell?

Yes

Can anyone please tell me, Is there any difference between shell of ubuntu and fedora?

Not really. But i recommend doing so and installing oh-my-zsh, zsh syntax highlighting and enabling some extras - as well as using tilix.

And setting a theme for oh-my-zsh as the first thing you do

Which terminal commands are simpler, ubuntu or fedora?

Which terminal commands are simpler, ubuntu or fedora?

there is no difference.

The base system commands remain the same - the only difference is apt becomes dnf

Ok

Thanks to all?

Heck i should write an article for that sometime

I actually have one machine with swap enabled

Any reason in particular?

Hibernation is the most common reason

Any reason in particular?

The server depicted in the screenshot below that hosts several vms for me and friends - i dont want someone going way beyond their usual usage to kill th entire server. XD

The server depicted in the screenshot below that hosts several vms for me and friends - i dont want someone going way beyond their usual usage to kill th entire server. XD

That’s a good reason

Hibernation is the most common reason

Chrome is another one :D it works nice with enough RAM or Swap but is able to kill your DE if you run out of Memory

I just reinstalled the Nvidia driver from Negativo17 and to my surprise, Wayland started working. I logged into Sway and I launched a game that runs on Wine and it worked perfectly yet the NVIDIA driver is not supposed to support XWayland. What exactly is happening?

I just reinstalled the Nvidia driver from Negativo17 and to my surprise, Wayland started working. I logged into Sway and I launched a game that runs on Wine and it worked perfectly yet the NVIDIA driver is not supposed to support XWayland. What exactly is happening?

He packs in the nvidia made display architecture that no distro wants to ship because its a broken horrible mess that will likely not make it into the kernel and everyone waits for nvidia to adapt it to the widely used standard i think.

same reason why amd has to redo their display abstraction layer too - the kernel devs said it was too much of a mess to be included so back to the refactoring for amd.

Well, honestly, im suprised it works so well. Sway isn't really my thing but the game I played didn't have any performance loss at all. Everything worked perfectly fine. Wayland + NVIDIA + Sway is a fantastic combination though it seems

Until the next kernel update, yes. XD

Fedora and nvidia is pure luck to get working consitently - nvidia is lazy and slow to adapt because they rather work on getting their stuff ready for the slow ubuntu release cycle.

KDE+Nvidia is still broken as of right now and kde nvidia fedora users had quite a long time without working DE afaik.

KWin was always horrible on NVIDIA for me on any distribution

The screen tearing is very visible