sameroom
[hbelusca] you'll see what I'm doing.
sameroom
[x86corez] HardError :)
sameroom
[hbelusca] yeah
sameroom
[x86corez] hyoenmadan: ReactOS Live CD is almost RosPE
sameroom
[hyoenmadan] <x86corez>: looking like PE doesn't meant it is or offers the same APIs as a full PE
sameroom
[hyoenmadan] only via testing you will know if it offers enough for your needs
sameroom
[hyoenmadan] but is true ROS PE mode is a bit hackish
sameroom
[hyoenmadan] also is true some MS code in PE is superfluous, and obeys only the needs for a licensing contril scheme
sameroom
[hyoenmadan] so OEMs wouldn't skip licensing requirements and tried to use PE as a free windows
sameroom
[hyoenmadan] as you can see, both sides have its points: while ROS pe mode still isn't complete/proper implemented, many of the MS facilities found it is PE flavor will not be implemented, as we don't need them
Vladislav Brezgin
tkreuzer_tb hello, how can I build ReactOS amd64 with your latest fixes?
sameroom
[hyoenmadan] as the license control checks
sameroom
[hbelusca] @k_inspired I would personally wait for the amd64 patch to land on trunk before starting testings.
sameroom
[dandelion] i have one error with x64 when try to build
sameroom
[dandelion] reactos\ntoskrnl\mm\ARM3\mminit.c(243): error C4047: 'initializing': 'PVOID' differs in levels of indirection from 'unsigned __int64'
sameroom
[hbelusca] dandelion: x64 patches are not in trunk yet.
sameroom
[dandelion] is ok, i just try to see
sameroom
[dandelion] I see only one, so is better than before
sameroom
[mjansen] again?
sameroom
[mjansen] this is the 4th or so time that error is pasted in here
sameroom
[dandelion] where can I find x64 patches ?
sameroom
[hbelusca] it's a PR in github.
sameroom
[hbelusca] And I suppose tkreuzer also has some other local fixes not yet pushed into the PR.
Alisson
can I download ReactOS AMD64 builds?
sameroom
[hbelusca] NO
sameroom
[hbelusca] Do you guys read what we write here?
sameroom
[hbelusca] "[21:31:24] <@hbelusca> @k_inspired I would personally wait for the amd64 patch to land on trunk before starting testings."
sameroom
[hbelusca] so NOT in trunk YET!
sameroom
[hbelusca] and
Eris
@hbelusca yes
sameroom
[hbelusca] [21:35:45] <dandelion> where can I find x64 patches ?
sameroom
[hbelusca] [21:35:58] <@hbelusca> it's a PR in github.
sameroom
[hbelusca] [21:36:16] <@hbelusca> And I suppose tkreuzer also has some other local fixes not yet pushed into the PR.
sameroom
[hbelusca] meaning, it's a 4*WORK IN PROGRESS*6 !!!!
sameroom
[hbelusca] so how/where would you expect to find builds of ROS amd64??????
sameroom
[mjansen] they dont want to read
sameroom
[hbelusca] (apart from in the HDD of the dev who is porting ROS to x64).
sameroom
[x86corez] there are many Telegram users who don't care about reading all spam xD
Eris
and some who are outright dumb, excuse the expression, but its the truth
Eris
they give less shits about warnings and all
sameroom
[ThFabba] Whatever indicated to people that amd64 is something that's worth trying at this point, might be the "spam" :p
sameroom
[mjansen] ThFabba: guess once who started asking for an x64 build
sameroom
[ThFabba] Heh
sameroom
[ThFabba] Yeah, I saw it earlier
sameroom
[x86corez] lol
sameroom
[mjansen] kk
sameroom
[x86corez] @jeditobe is speading tkreuzer's amd64 screenshots everywhere :D
sameroom
[ThFabba] Well, that's fine
sameroom
[hbelusca] ThFabba: well i'm a bit culprit here since I pasted the tkreuzer's screenshots here.
sameroom
[ThFabba] But those screenshots clearly indicate that it DOES NOT BOOT TO SHELL
sameroom
[hbelusca] really?
sameroom
[ThFabba] Unless I haven't seen the latest screenshots...?
sameroom
[hbelusca] then check the one of yesterday.
sameroom
[hbelusca] yeah sec
sameroom
[x86corez] ThFabba: https://abload.de/img/reactos-amd64_notepadfsuk7.png
sameroom
[ThFabba] Very nice
sameroom
[ThFabba] Well in that case, it's more understandable
sameroom
[hbelusca] ah yeah that one, thanks :)
sameroom
[x86corez] yeah, they want to touch it
Vladislav Brezgin
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
sameroom
[ThFabba] What would people do with it though...? Find ways to make it crash? That's going to be trivial
sameroom
[hbelusca] oh yeah I've just noticed... There's no tray buttons in there.
sameroom
[x86corez] +1
sameroom
[hbelusca] mjansen: is our atl code x64-ready?
sameroom
[mjansen] it is my 'personal opinion' that it doesnt make sense for some people to try it
Eris
its not like reactos will crash itself after realizing its running as x64
sameroom
[ThFabba] What are tray buttons?
sameroom
[mjansen] hbelusca: probably not
sameroom
[x86corez] ThFabba: Notepad's button at task panel
sameroom
[ThFabba] <reactos-tg> [the1freeman] its not like reactos will crash itself after realizing its running as x64 << actually, it pretty much will
sameroom
[ThFabba] x86corez: ah
Eris
thats what i was indicating
sameroom
[ThFabba] (Those are called taskbar buttons btw, the tray is only the Notification Area)
sameroom
[hbelusca] taskbar buttons thanks.
sameroom
[x86corez] https://sun1-12.userapi.com/c830209/v830209082/b730e/2tdGu62h_LA.jpg
sameroom
[x86corez] https://pp.userapi.com/c846320/v846320348/a0a5/nNSB6JRPn3Q.jpg
sameroom
[x86corez] ReactOS on real hardware with Core i7 and two video cards
sameroom
[x86corez] both videodrivers are installed without errors :)
sameroom
[x86corez] (photos from Anton Stankevich)
sameroom
[hbelusca] x86corez: impressive :)