Hey so

lets assume I have two arrays

and I need to find RELATIVE similaritiy

aka if array1 goes up, subarray has to go up too

etc

goes up? like gets more elements added?

something like this

goes up? like gets more elements added?

no, the value

LIke. I can't come up with anything better than O(n^2)

Map<Array> Pair

Map<Array> Pair

huh?

like I have two arrays in total

one big one

and one where I have to find subsets

So I don't think that a map would work here

i already encode them like that

yeah that was way too complicated joke but anyways

hashing here wouldn't help me a lot because hash would be just as slow as just checking each

why your ide font has no antialiasing

why your ide font has no antialiasing

dunno, this is firacode

and i love firacode

Source Code Pro ftw

Comics sans

hm firacode looks nice

hm firacode looks nice

yes

hashing here wouldn't help me a lot because hash would be just as slow as just checking each

anyway

Is there a faster than O(n^2) way of checking this?

area you ready for the big summoning?

lets all say the magic words together

"olli please join our conversation"

hmm I have some idea but meh

hmm I have some idea but meh

what is it?

lets assume I have two arrays

@ollirz

Is this O(n^2)?

Is this O(n^2)?

this is not

but this is the actual logic in the code

Oh ok, now i got it

Heapsort

If you used gcc under mingw in the past your binaries didn't support ASLR for example

Wait srsly

NX was also unsupport if I remember correctly

ok that is like plain retarded

lets kill gcc

and me

Thanks. I've read the pinned message.

Hi folks!!

and one where I have to find subsets

I think you want to find sub-array in main-array Ex.arr1[ ] = {1,2,3,4,5} arr2[ ] = {3,4} arr1 is main array arr2 is sub array arr2 is present in arra1? am i right ?

Is it just me, or is writing STD:: feels wrong.

Is it just me, or is writing STD:: feels wrong.

Just you I guess

Is it just me, or is writing STD:: feels wrong.

Where do you write "STD::"?

Just you I guess

Well I guess it's better than writing crabs::

Where do you write "STD::"?

I was reviewing some code with std:: for some reason it got auto corrected to upper case

Well I guess it's better than writing crabs::

I actually like how std:: looks, well I like how the scope operator looks

I was reviewing some code with std:: for some reason it got auto corrected to upper case

Lol :D

😂

I actually like how std:: looks, well I like how the scope operator looks

As a man, I tend to avoid the type of thought provoking that a global scope like std may in tail at end of file.

Dafuq

im humanoid 🤖

/gbun

im humanoid 🤖

You might wanna look at humanoidsolutions.io

You might wanna look at humanoidsolutions.io

wew i lov that animation

click bait at its peek

click bait at its peek

IKR :P

IKR :P

how to make those kinda sites!

If you wait long enough, there's multiple "click here" "or here" "or maybe here"

how to make those kinda sites!

It's quite simple actually; bootstrap + animateJS + JS

It's quite simple actually; bootstrap + animateJS + JS

o.o

Shouldn't be too hard, perfection will take time tho' these are kinda perfectionist sites

I wonder if this is spam

Hm I concider it spam

I wonder if this is spam

How

It isn't related

No one asked

Hmm