hmmm

it was sadly a joke

butttt

if you want

i can do something

i can do something

yeah , banana pies please XD

pies... hm

pie s ?

okay

come over

how do i create arrays in c++ ?i forgot....

pies... hm

yeah pies , not πs

how do i create arrays in c++ ?i forgot....

type name[]

and if i want to do 2d or 3d?

how do i create arrays in c++ ?i forgot....

use std::array

use std::array

whats that?

and if i want to do 2d or 3d?

make an array of an array

whats that?

a wrapper around arrays

okay

i want to program my algorithm

so

i need testing array

and if i want to do 2d or 3d?

type name[][] or what maxi said

i want to program my algorithm

Which?

ill do maxi thing

Which?

i though at my czech class one algorithm that could save cca 60/61 of my render time

@linuxer4fun so how would be 3d array?

std::array <std::array <type, size>, size> myarray;

wha

why is it so ugly

it is not

weell

type name[][][] is more nicer

type name[][][] is more nicer

not, when you understand the underlying stuff

why is it so ugly

xD

type [][] is a pointer of pointers

not, when you understand the underlying stuff

no one cares

and pointers get dirty quickly

why is it so ugly

array of array

oh ok

ill do that

maxi and 3d array?

type [][] is a pointer of pointers

which is technically this

maxi and 3d array?

add one more std::array

maxi and 3d array?

just add one more array

std::array<std::array<std::array?

and how do i access it?

std::array<std::array<std::array?

yes

thats super ugly

thats super ugly

just take 3 seconds to look at it and it won't look as ugly as the first second

std::array<std::array<std::array<int,3>,3>3> map;

vs

int map[3][3][3]

YOU WERE WRONG PEOPLE

std::array<int,3,3,3>

what?

no, that won't work

why not

// 3-dimensions, this begins to get out-of-hand int _c[2][2][2] = {{{3, 3}, {4, 4}}, {{5, 5}, {6, 6}}}; array<int, 2, 2, 2> c = {{{{{3, 3}, {4, 4}}}, {{{5, 5}, {6, 6}}}}};

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43628497/3d-stdarray-in-c

god dammit

@linuxer4fun

slightly cancer XD

mhm

you should reduce the brackets i think

it

compiles

Or access elements by like i*len+j

[kurimi@KlimiStation ~]$ g++ optimalization.cpp -std=c++17 -Werror [kurimi@KlimiStation ~]$

(i*len1+j)*len2+k

etc.

i get it

but

they say that std::array is better

and i just need some data for testing my algorithm

they say that std::array is better

i think it's just a wrapper around normal arrays

shrug

i think it's just a wrapper around normal arrays

yeah

I need a std::tensor XD