@programminginc - страница 709

BinaryByter

oh

BinaryByter

well look at the code

BinaryByter

refactor the code

DaviC

If it works like you say i will be able to do instruction [26] to access to opcode at bit 26 for example?

BinaryByter

yea

BinaryByter

i'm sorry

BinaryByter

@qneko

BinaryByter

you were right

BinaryByter

OOP in C++ becomes super messy

pk

/

olli

If it works like you say i will be able to do instruction [26] to access to opcode at bit 26 for example?

you cannot access single bits only. You need to read at least a char and extract the bit you are looking for. So if you are interested in bit 26 of an uint32_t you would need to (v >> 0x19U) & 0x1U

klimi

Yo admin

Ибраги́м

Any c++ language lawyer in here? Is there really no compiler that issues a diagnostic? According to temp.res this should be ill-formed or shouldn't it? template <typename ...Ts> struct X { X(Ts ...args) : i(1337, args...) {} int i; }; int main() { X<> x; }

Nope, args... is just here as clown since X<> has no type instatation. Hence i = 1337. Do something like: X<int, int> x{2, 4} then u get error for i being a scalar value

olli

Nope, args... is just here as clown since X<> has no type instatation. Hence i = 1337. Do something like: X<int, int> x{2, 4} then u get error for i being a scalar value

so you're saying it is well-formed?

Ибраги́м

so you're saying it is well-formed?

Yes sire.

klimi

GN admins

olli

The program is not well-formed but the compiler is not required to issue diagnostics. Which is quite interesting because there is no way to be sure your code is well-formed even if it compiles C++ is awesome :D

Anonymous

Does anyone know any good encryption library in C?

klimi

Does anyone know any good encryption library in C?

That's a good question

olli

Does anyone know any good encryption library in C?

mbedTLS

Anonymous

I read that OpenSSL is a good one. What do you think?

olli

I read that OpenSSL is a good one. What do you think?

you can go with OpenSSL as well, however several vulnerabilities also affected OpenSSL. If you can, I would prefer LibreSSL over OpenSSL anytime.

Anonymous

Mmh. Which one would you recommend between OpenSSL, LibreSSL and the one you said before?

olli

Mmh. Which one would you recommend between OpenSSL, LibreSSL and the one you said before?

If you have seen / are somewhat familiar with OpenSSL I would recommend LibreSSL.

Anonymous

I'm not familiar with any of those. I just need to choose one and learn it.

Anonymous

This is why I'm asking

olli

then go with LibreSSL

Anonymous

Why do you think that LibreSSL is better than OpenSSL?

klimi

you can go with OpenSSL as well, however several vulnerabilities also affected OpenSSL. If you can, I would prefer LibreSSL over OpenSSL anytime.

^

olli

Initially LibreSSL is a fork of OpenSSL with the aim to modernize, refactor and secure the project. As a result several critical vulnerabilities affected OpenSSL but none of them affected LibreSSL. The removed a lot of useless code and added some security features by default.

olli

http://www.libressl.org/goals.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreSSL

Anonymous

Interesting. If I wanted to use AES 256 encryption , could I use both , right?

olli

Yes, in terms of functionality OpenSSL and LibreSSL were quite similar (at least the last time i checked)

Anonymous

Which encryption library could I use for code obfuscation instead?

olli

Which encryption library could I use for code obfuscation instead?

What are you trying to do? Obfuscating your source code? >> why? using C or C++ you are going to compile it anyway. Obfuscating your code might not change the compiled binary at all

Anonymous

is it useless?

Anonymous

oh yeah I guess

BinaryByter

I can't believe there are still people who try to obfuzcate their binary by encrypting and derrypting functions

BinaryByter

Like

BinaryByter

Dafaq

Anonymous

lol dumb question xD