BinaryByter
not yet
BinaryByter
i'm overwelmed by work
Dima
who’s talkin
Anonymous
BinaryByter
and gods program their own kernel
Dima
with bootloader
BinaryByter
yea
BinaryByter
with bootloader
Dima
with own build cpu
BinaryByter
obviously
BinaryByter
I build my own transistors
Dima
that’s ot
Dima
move to ot group
BinaryByter
that’s ot
+ not funny
klimi
that had to hurt
klimi
DUde... i have already told you that if you will forward from your channel
klimi
without asking or anything
klimi
i will ban you...
Anonymous
Ok
Dima
rekt
Roxifλsz 🇱🇹
/warn offtopic forwarding from your own channel once again
Marie
ABDULHASIB has 2/3 warnings... watch out! Reason for last warn: offtopic forwarding from your own channel once again
BinaryByter
we can find out if you want
klimi
/warns
Marie
/warns
This user has 2/3 warnings, for the following reasons: - copyrighit - no illegal books
klimi
youre fine ^^
Michael
Where is it
Ибраги́м
Damn I always forget min max exists.
Michael
Hii how u doing
klimi
im fine
Michael
That's great
Michael
I like swimming dreaming card throwing and my favourite programming
klimi
I'm doing install script...
Michael
Drumming*
Michael
That
Michael
Ohh why
Dima
get rekt
klimi
hm its instagram
klimi
i wont promote that
abhi3700
What does foo in c++ represent?
abhi3700
Anyone?
klimi
it isnt that hard to find out
Dima
I just.. can’t
Dima
is it trolling or what
Dima
can’t hold my lols now
Roxifλsz 🇱🇹
Roxifλsz 🇱🇹
What does foo in c++ represent?
Nothing, it could be a variable name, depends...
Dima
it’s an example name
Dima
foo bar
Otumian
then continue with python
Hmm.. max you are recommending python? I hope you are alive
abhi3700
i have seen foo()
abhi3700
i have seen foo()
in functions
Dima
it’s example
Roxifλsz 🇱🇹
i have seen foo()
Well then it means that your program has a function called "foo"
BinaryByter
What does foo in c++ represent?
it's a common name for <something>
Otumian
abhi3700
Any opinions on const char* vs std::string vs char[] ??
BinaryByter
always use std::string
BinaryByter
std::string is a wraper for char*
abhi3700
Okk
BinaryByter
const char* is pointless because you cannot change it's content
BinaryByter
char[] is the same as char* and will result in memory leaks if you don't handle it carefully
olli
char[] is the same as char* and will result in memory leaks if you don't handle it carefully
This is not always correct. const char [] foo = "Hello World"; Is not the same as const char * foo = "Hello World";
BinaryByter
agreed
Anonymous
Thank u
Anonymous
/saved
Marie
/saved
Notes in chat: - cpp - cppbook - freeprogrammingbooks - goodcodingmentality - goodgoogling - googleit - hownottoask - howtoask - ide - learn - meta - noendl - offtopic - ot - projects
Anonymous
cppbook
⠠⠍⠥⠓⠁⠍⠍⠁⠙⠽⠥⠎⠥⠋
cppbook
#cppbook
Marie
cppbook
https://t.me/programminginc/49901
Anonymous
Hello
Anonymous
hi
Anonymous
please am novice when it comes to programming