have you tried range-v3 ?

is that an implementation of dlang ranges?

It's a range library for C++11/14/17 that has been proposed for C++20 It's pretty neat

It's a range library for C++11/14/17 that has been proposed for C++20 It's pretty neat

so many years to wait

I am eager for c++23

I hope for so many things to be part of c++ 20..

I hope for so many things to be part of c++ 20..

web

math constants

ranges

a better string class

you missed coroutines ! and modules as well as networking :D

you missed coroutines ! and modules as well as networking :D

COROUTINES ❤️

what are modules?

Yeah coroutines are love

Yeah coroutines are love

I have to implement em rn ;_;

Standard stackfull coroutines is my dream

Standard stackfull coroutines is my dream

Why stackful?

Something like the Resumeable Expressions proposed by Christopher Kohlhoff would be perfectly fine imho (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4453.pdf)

what are modules?

a "replacement" for header/source file split

a "replacement" for header/source file split

oh

yea

no

IIRC there was some precompilation of header files and a more compatible ABI

I still don't understand ABI's

whatsoever, the one thing i care for the most are coroutines

@QNeko teach me

whatsoever, the one thing i care for the most are coroutines

web*

will probably not be in C++20 though

i hope

Anybody knows the site for the test series for remove bugs , compile and run the c programs like c languages McQ type

very funny

I still don't understand ABI's

ABI is the API for your hardware. The ABI defines how functions are called, how parameters are passed including allocation, alingnment and so on

ABI is the API for your hardware. The ABI defines how functions are called, how parameters are passed including allocation, alingnment and so on

Oh. so it's boring shit

Being ABI compatible with future versions can be challenging, so not boring per se

i'm not the guy who builds the compiler

this applies to any compiled library as well

I already did so twice lol

Something like the Resumeable Expressions proposed by Christopher Kohlhoff would be perfectly fine imho (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4453.pdf)

Well, the issue with stackless is exhaustion of stack and the termination issue

wasted time, really

I have to trust the life of my phone to this indian website's cloud ;_;

I might not have a phone in twenty minutes anymore :D

wat?

I am in germany :)

wrong

Well, the issue with stackless is exhaustion of stack and the termination issue

Gor presented a way to prevent stack exhaustion. I actually don't think it's a big issue. The first resumable functions have been implemented around 2015. And stackless Coroutines seem to be "production ready"

The one that presents the best solution to my problem.

Multi paradigm

I am not sure I got your question. All members of your class need to be defined inside it. To use your constructor in other translation units you need to add the constructor to your class definition (in your header) as well.

Thanks marie

Thanks marie

You're welcome

Ok

What is the topic for today

What is the topic for today

@KlimiCZ

Today topics is unknown

Please write /newtopic for generate a new one

/newtopic

THIS

is why you shoudln't use vim

Why lol

is why you shoudln't use vim

Whyyyy

the line numbers

yes, I do use vim myself

You can copy it without

you can't

You can lol

Because I am still learning

visual mode + yank won't push to the clipboard

Hw can I start

line 25 yiealds problems

the variable is protected

and I inherit the base class

why can't I access prealloc_size?

I should be able to

from all I know

Visual Studio Code

Youll find out

Nothing, use it as much as you'd want

Its the perfect language

No i just dont want to discuss stuff ive discussed over and over

Time for some more indian music. Aka earrape

line 25 yiealds problems

Protected member access Protected members form the interface for the derived classes (which is distinct from the public interface of the class). A protected member of a class Base can only be accessed 1) by the members and friends of Base 2) by the members and friends (until C++17) of any class derived from Base, but only when operating on an object of a type that is derived from Base (including this)