you cannot const a pointer's pointee

you cannot const a pointer's pointee

you cannot do this for a reference either

you cannot do this for a reference either

you can

so if i take the address of a reference value

#cpp

https://t.me/programminginc/24103

change it from const to normal

because for a reference, operator's constnesses are to be preserved

and then use it that way

so if i take the address of a reference value

then you are doing C in C++

Really, learning how to do proper queries in google is important

then you are doing C in C++

but it will work to modify the under lying structure

so your basis is wrong

but it will work to modify the under lying structure

and is stupid hacking

and is stupid hacking

but it WORKS

U can change the value of a variable that's refered by a const reference

and it working is the only important thing

🎃

you saying it is impossible is purely wrong

any bug that exists from the C method still stays in the C++ method

and it working is the only important thing

then sorry to tell you, but (int*)0=9; is also valid in C

then sorry to tell you, but (int*)0=9; is also valid in C

i know

any bug that exists from the C method still stays in the C++ method

You should never use the C subset of C++ in C++

i used this a lot to fuck with people

C++ guidelines dude

i used this a lot to fuck with people

i got the stack offset and use that to find the variable i wanted to modify

i used this a lot to fuck with people

That is why I say since 1h you are a dumb fuck that should not be allowed to work anywhere near code xD

and then i did (type*) ((uint8_t*) main + 0xXXX) = ...

That is why I say since 1h you are a dumb fuck that should not be allowed to work anywhere near code xD

i only fuck with people to show them they do not understand their own programming langauge

in each language there are always issues

which can arise

that will ALWAYS be hazardous to new people

And C get the palm of it not having corrected one in 30 years

C++ is a shit langauge for this

And C get the palm of it not having corrected one in 30 years

it actually has less downfalls then C++

that will ALWAYS be hazardous to new people

It need to be taugh right, not by someone who takes pointers for an important part of the language

It need to be taugh right, not by someone who takes pointers for an important part of the language

they are VERY important

they are VERY important

Like a bulldozer in a construction site, and you don't give bulldozers to any man on the site

Like a bulldozer in a construction site, and you don't give bulldozers to any man on the site

i mean you maybe not

but i would

would be funny

would be funny

Yeah, and can kill people eventually

and construction sites are paid for by taxpayers

so i do not care

and construction sites are paid for by taxpayers

mmmh nope, only public ones

mmmh nope, only public ones

yep but that is pretty much every one

Unless taxpayers pay for your house

Unless taxpayers pay for your house

taxpayers do subsidize new communities to a degree

just enough to cover certain areas

taxpayers do subsidize new communities to a degree

Well, not in most countries dude

Well, not in most countries dude

Canada and i am SURE the US

Canada and i am SURE the US

but never in europe, nor asia

would be funny

btw, this is the blabbering of a psychopath, I encourage you to stop that

btw, this is the blabbering of a psychopath, I encourage you to stop that

WHOA THIS IS RUDE

WHOA THIS IS RUDE

This is talking lightly about critical risks

This is talking lightly about critical risks

ya i do that all the time

i do worse actually but that will make you think i am fully psychopathic

the day one will tell you your bad jokes in C code have killed someone due to a disfunction of medical hardware, or the day your wife or son is killed by such a flaw, you will think back about it

And I can tell you I have seen this shit happen

i have seen a fuckup in PLC logic that broke an airplane and airplane hanger

all because someone changed a minus sign

i laughed but kept it inside me

and neither a Tiobe check nor an ASIL cert on your compiler change a thing

functional

Use the right tool at the right place

functional allows for a wider set of problems to solve then object oriented

of course anything done in one paradigm can be done in another one

functional allows for a wider set of problems to solve then object oriented

not really as functions can be objects

not really as functions can be objects

and objects can be functions

and vice-versa

look into lambda calculus

look into lambda calculus

don't take me for a beginner

I have 10 years in the industry

i forget how many years i have

i know for sure over 7

but never really count

because it is boring shit

And you are still unhireable imo

And you are still unhireable imo

i work in robotics

so completely different field and questions are needed