(which in fact is true due to the lack of features as opposed to C++)

most of the features of C++ are it's standard lib

most of the features of C++ are it's standard lib

language core features != library "features"

most of the features of C++ are it's standard lib

Nope. Constexpr Templates Fold expressions Auto Decltype Namespaces Classes Noexcept .... Are not library features

But today for example GCC has a good support for C++17

which is a very great feature of C++ I was expecting

Executors TS have implementation u can use on Github. Parallelism is here already.

again a language isn't defined by the compilers

I think he is just saying that implementing a C compiler is easier

E.g. void foo() { int v = 3; int &vi = v; [=](){ decltype (i) t; decltpe((vi)) x =t; } } What's the type of x?

Error: vi is NOT captured!

Correct answer depends on how it's been captured

I updated the snippet What's the result when captured by copy? What's the result when by reference?

int&

E.g. void foo() { int v = 3; int &vi = v; [=](){ decltype (i) t; decltpe((vi)) x =t; } } What's the type of x?

when captured by copy or reference?

Now u corrected it bcos the original version : void foo() { int v = 3; int &vi = v; [](){ decltpe((vi)) x; } } Is horrifying

Reference

a.substr(0,1).swap(b.substr(0,1)); why I can’t do this..

substr returns a new string swap accepts only non const lvalue paramters (only object that have names) the returned string from swap cannot be captured as non const lvalue reference so you can't do it

and when captured by copy?

and when captured by copy?

huh? XD

how's catch for testing? been using gtests

I have had bad experiences with catch

Don't do testing xD

btw, why does everyone have GNU behind their names now??? xD

shush it

Uh

Don't do testing xD

yes master, I must test all code by hand, and if it breaks, it then becomes a new feature 🤞

Don't test it by code

Don't test it by code

after all, unexpected behaviors create the best features am I right??

I'm just so sad