consteval sent multiple messages that looks like a spam.
To stop the bot from deleting your messages, write something non-suspicious. Or find out why here.
Spam deleted in this group: 2440
consteval is now approved by the group admin and can send messages without any restrictions
std::move returns a std::remove_reference_t<T>&&
See spam? Quote the spam message in the group and reply with /spam
Never Spam Bot
That's 2/2 warnings; 🇷🇪🇭🇦🇳 is banned!
Reasons:
1: nohello.com
2: nohello.com
User Puss has 1/2 warnings; be careful!
Reason:
nohello.com
User Camille has 1/2 warnings; be careful!
Reason:
spam/offtopic
User Shreya has 1/2 warnings; be careful!
Reason:
non-english
Shreya
User Shreya has 1/2 warnings; be careful!
Reason:
non-english
Why warning??
I just asked for help
klimi
User Soniya has 1/2 warnings; be careful!
Reason:
nohello.com
Jeffery
Hi guys
exo
@K11M1 I did before you
That's 2/2 warnings; Soniya is banned!
Reasons:
1: nohello.com
2: nohello.com
User CupCake has 1/2 warnings; be careful!
Reason:
nohello.com
Suresh
Ok
exo
blocked
$cram!
blocckk
That's 2/2 warnings; Lee Ace is banned!
Reasons:
1: spam
2: nohello.com
Thomas
That's 2/2 warnings; Lee Ace is banned!
Reasons:
1: spam
2: nohello.com
This group chat is turning into python gc smh
Who
Any inc. est
Augmented
Hi everybody, can someone tell me Is there a soliton object instance assertion mechanism in compile and runtime in newer versions of c++ or it still must be done in the old fashion way with a pointer and check inside the constructor's body
Pavel
Hi everybody, can someone tell me Is there a soliton object instance assertion mechanism in compile and runtime in newer versions of c++ or it still must be done in the old fashion way with a pointer and check inside the constructor's body
Can you give an example of what you want to do? I don't really understand what you're looking for
Dasha
Thanks
Ludovic 'Archivist'
Hi everybody, can someone tell me Is there a soliton object instance assertion mechanism in compile and runtime in newer versions of c++ or it still must be done in the old fashion way with a pointer and check inside the constructor's body
Use static. Static initialization is thread-safe and guaranteed to only happen once
Mysterious
Can i anyone help me by sharing video lecture and resources for c++ ?
CupCake
Why can't we say hello bro
CupCake
Remove these shitty boy commands plz admins
CupCake
Bot*
Ludovic 'Archivist'
Why can't we say hello bro
Read nohello.com
No need to ping 18 thousand people to say hello
CupCake
Read nohello.com
No need to ping 18 thousand people to say hello
Yeah that's true too.. anyone here solves codeforces qs ??
Su Nianxue
what's new?
Ray【レイトレーサル】Tracer
Anonymous
Share some programming questions
Rajeev
Does anybody have any work to give to me?
GOD_EMPEROR
annyone tried web vm thats running linux machine in browser
Ludovic 'Archivist'
annyone tried web vm thats running linux machine in browser
Fabrice Bellard made that in 2018, plenty of people tested it
Augmented
Use static. Static initialization is thread-safe and guaranteed to only happen once
Thanks, thats good idea
..
Hi
Nikita
Use static. Static initialization is thread-safe and guaranteed to only happen once
but need to keep in mind that its safe in case only if the object that initialized is thread safe ( constructor of object can try to access some shared resource )
Ziky
but need to keep in mind that its safe in case only if the object that initialized is thread safe ( constructor of object can try to access some shared resource )
Initialization of static object should not happen concurrently
Abbasi
but need to keep in mind that its safe in case only if the object that initialized is thread safe ( constructor of object can try to access some shared resource )
He meant that initialization happens only once. Its value can change if it's mutable though.
static objects are initialized even before main() (mostly)
Ziky
yes
The only exception I am aware of is when your main is in C file. But I don't belive someone will do that intentionally.
Abbasi
void f() {
static auto i = 3;
}
int main() {
f();
}
Abbasi
OMG You are right :D https://onlinegdb.com/cAQCZO2GQ thanks :)
Not related but you may use \n instead of endl as it's more efficient
Ziky
Not related but you may use \n instead of endl as it's more efficient
isn't in causing problems on windows ?
Abbasi
I've used it on almost all my cross-platform applications. Haven't seen a clear issue.
Of course, I've heard that it may cause crashing in rare situations in which endl is the correct choice. But generally \n should be used and endl in kind of real time programs.
Anunay
/ban nsfw, likely spam
/ban nsfw, likely spam
Another one bites the dust...!
Banned ZOYA SHAIKH ⱽᵉʳⁱᶠⁱᵉᵈ.
Reason:
nsfw, likely spam
EmbRio
/start@MissRose_bot
EmbRio
Can I chat now
EmbRio
Hello everyone
EmbRio
I want to learn c programming
scar tissue
I want to learn c programming
Please check out this channel - @Resources for information on learning sources for C and C++ (books and videos) and Frequently Asked Questions.
Eduarda
/start@MissRose_bot
B M Namith
#paste
#paste
To share code or error tracebacks, use an online pasting service like:
- https://hastebin.com
- https://pastebin.com
- https://dpaste.org
- https://wandbox.org
- https://godbolt.org
Never Spam Bot
B M Namith Saliyan sent multiple messages that looks like a spam.
To stop the bot from deleting your messages, write something non-suspicious. Or find out why here.
Spam deleted in this group: 2504
User Prity has 1/2 warnings; be careful!
Reason:
nohello.com
User Chetan has 1/2 warnings; be careful!
Reason:
nohello.com
User Ritik has 1/2 warnings; be careful!
Reason:
nohello.com
User Vansh has 1/2 warnings; be careful!
Reason:
nohello.com