I need to c++ job support Is their any one pls ping me personally

If you don't know how a computer works, someone like me will likely need to clean after you and bankrupt your company in the process like a grim reaper of shitty implementations

Couldn't have said it better myself 😄 C/C++ are powerful tools, and with great power, comes great responsibility 😁 Jokes aside, it's honestly for the best, cause somebody's gotta do it as it WILL come back to bite you in the ass later on. I'm all for getting things working and establishing a functioning system ASAP myself, but even that in moderation. If it'll come at the cost of having to refractor half the codebase which relies on a truckload of interconnected modules/components later on, I'm not gonna make the stupid decision of doing before I think.

To share code or error tracebacks, use an online pasting service like: - https://hastebin.com - https://pastebin.com - https://dpaste.org - https://wandbox.org - https://godbolt.org

I need to c++ job support Is their any one pls ping me personally

Google to the rescue

User Siddhanth has 1/2 warnings; be careful! Reason: yt channel ad

what will happen, if you click the button but missing the update method loop?

in everyframe, your system will update every physics in an Update Method, which is called everyframe. what will happend if your input timming missing that Update Method?

User Algorithm has 1/2 warnings; be careful! Reason: no personal ad

what will happen, if you click the button but missing the update method loop?

Wtf are you talking about

Wtf are you talking about

nothing

nothing

User Wricoder has 1/2 warnings; be careful! Reason: well then it's offtop

in everyframe, your system will update every physics in an Update Method, which is called everyframe. what will happend if your input timming missing that Update Method?

Could you provide more context？what update method are you talking about？

well..

what will happen, if you click the button but missing the update method loop?

Provide better context please What framework or lib or whatever are you talking about? What exactly do you want to know? If you're talking about GUI event handlers, it depends on implementation Some throw exceptions, some just ignore undefined events, etc.

OK

I'm not even sure I understood your question properly

let me reconstruct my words..

emm

you konw, every graphic system and any physics system are running in a loop right? normally 30frames or 60frames every seconds

well, with in one single frame

there are always a method called like Update to deal with all the input that happened in the frame

and after the Update Method, normally in this kind of life cycle, there should be more method like LateUpdate excute after Update, which the LateUpdate is not used to deal with the input action

my qeustion is

what if , when you give an input action to the system, like you click the button of your mouse, but the timming is missing the Update Method excution. what will system do to deal with this input?

next cpu time slice will capture it

you konw, every graphic system and any physics system are running in a loop right? normally 30frames or 60frames every seconds

Sure, the render cycle I got what you mean If the events are handled properly, the inputs will be buffered and in the next execution cycle the frame will be updated

in everyframe, your system will update every physics in an Update Method, which is called everyframe. what will happend if your input timming missing that Update Method?

???

and after the Update Method, normally in this kind of life cycle, there should be more method like LateUpdate excute after Update, which the LateUpdate is not used to deal with the input action

this aint unity engine

this aint unity engine

I don't think they're talking in context of that

Sure, the render cycle I got what you mean If the events are handled properly, the inputs will be buffered and in the next execution cycle the frame will be updated

OK, thank you

next cpu time slice will capture it

Thank you

thank you

If you don't know how a computer works, someone like me will likely need to clean after you and bankrupt your company in the process like a grim reaper of shitty implementations

And learning how computer works will bring us to learn assembly language, right ?

And learning how computer works will bring us to learn assembly language, right ?

It depends on how deep you want to go in that rabbit hole. Assembly is definitely not as deep as it goes

Please i want help me c++

Can you help me write C++ code for these requirements 🙏🏻

Can you help me write C++ code for these requirements 🙏🏻

ㅤJsk sent a huge message, it has been re-uploaded as a file

It depends on how deep you want to go in that rabbit hole. Assembly is definitely not as deep as it goes

Alright, and what can be deeper than Assembly to know how computer works ?

Machine code？

Logic gates, too

Logic gates, too

It's useful for a programmer to know that ?

Alright, and what can be deeper than Assembly to know how computer works ?

Microcode rewriting, prefetcher internals, register aliasing, pipelining, interweaving...

It's useful for a programmer to know that ?

If you're an embedded programmer for example, perhaps.

If you're an embedded programmer for example, perhaps.

or in finance, or in video games

Microcode rewriting, prefetcher internals, register aliasing, pipelining, interweaving...

Thanks for enlightenment

Microcode rewriting, prefetcher internals, register aliasing, pipelining, interweaving...

I hear a lot u can became a programmer or a software developer by yourself without schools or degrees Is learning this stuff by yourself realistic?

Without universities or courses

Is “self thaught developer” still a thing?

I hear a lot u can became a programmer or a software developer by yourself without schools or degrees Is learning this stuff by yourself realistic?

It very much is, no need to rush it and take your time. You can't learn any craft in hours so it may take a year to learn the basics, then 3 more to learn the details, then 5 more to get more in depth, and 10 years after you will still be learning new things. Invest in yourself and learn a thing. Find something you want to make, make it, and then look back at what you learned

I have never been taught C++ and practiced it for 10 years now, I still learn new things every other day

It very much is, no need to rush it and take your time. You can't learn any craft in hours so it may take a year to learn the basics, then 3 more to learn the details, then 5 more to get more in depth, and 10 years after you will still be learning new things. Invest in yourself and learn a thing. Find something you want to make, make it, and then look back at what you learned

I’ll make another question now

How will it take to be profitable with programming 😭

In this huge lernaing process in what point u can start thinking about developing as a job

In this huge lernaing process in what point u can start thinking about developing as a job

Programming is a tool, not an end goal. Work your way up in deeper tech positions. If you are self taught, you may want to start with customer support or QA work, improve your skills and work your way up to developer. Try to stay at a position that you find enjoyable and in which you feel competent, there is no use getting up to manager to be a shitty manager from being an amazing dev

Do programming at home on the side for fun or to automate boring parts of your job. Use the languages that fit your goal best. A lot of programmers started with a book called "Automate the boring stuff with Python" which is an amazing entrance door to programming. Maybe come back to the harder languages and system after that if C++ feels overwhelming

ernaing process in what point u can start thinking

Alright, and what can be deeper than Assembly to know how computer works ?

Hardware works on digital hardware principles. Digital design is a field of hardware description with hdl languages such as verilog/vhdl so on. If you want to learn how the cpu and hardware communicate together you can buy any fpga with a cpu on the board. Let's say zynq7000 and make some code for hardware part of the system named programmable logic or the part where such companies like NVIDIA test their products

Alright, and what can be deeper than Assembly to know how computer works ?

Ofc, if you want the lowest of the lowest of the lowest part you can learn how the transistors work. To learn the transistor you definitely need to learn electricity, resistors, capacity so on, this is the lowest of the lowest by the way

Ofc, if you want the lowest of the lowest of the lowest part you can learn how the transistors work. To learn the transistor you definitely need to learn electricity, resistors, capacity so on, this is the lowest of the lowest by the way

Nah mate

From there u go on electrons and atomic bonds 😎

From there u go on electrons and atomic bonds 😎

and then all the way down to the quantum physics

how to extend define in an expression ( struct ) ? #define ABC asd struct a{ int asd; }; .... a b; b.(ABC) = 10; // b.asd = 10

It doesn't make a lot of sense here, but I need to know how to pull it off.

It doesn't make a lot of sense here, but I need to know how to pull it off.

what do you mean to "extend the define"? To define it as something else?

what do you mean to "extend the define"? To define it as something else?

no. use define instead of the variable itself ( I gave an example, it doesn't work )

No more problems. you can use define as a normal variable.

how to extend define in an expression ( struct ) ? #define ABC asd struct a{ int asd; }; .... a b; b.(ABC) = 10; // b.asd = 10

*p.s b.(ABC) => substitute b.ABC

#define ABC asd struct a{ int asd; }; int main() { struct a b; b.ABC = 10; // b.asd = 10 } Works fine for me... just not use .(ABC) but .ABC, it's just string match

#define ABC asd struct a{ int asd; }; int main() { struct a b; b.ABC = 10; // b.asd = 10 } Works fine for me... just not use .(ABC) but .ABC, it's just string match

did you turn off that bot? (which replaces the code with a file)

he's very annoying.

did you turn off that bot? (which replaces the code with a file)

No, I did not

he's very annoying.

I didn't even put the code in the code box because of this :)

#define ABC asd struct a{ int asd; }; int main() { struct a b; b.ABC = 10; // b.asd = 10 } Works fine for me... just not use .(ABC) but .ABC, it's just string match

This looks dangerous

This looks dangerous

(it is)

This looks dangerous

and yet it's being used in large projects

This looks dangerous

I saw it for the first time today.

Is there an off-topic here?

Is there an off-topic here?

Yes but we play Minecraft in there

Is there an off-topic here?

#ot

Is there an off-topic here?

Offtopic discussions should be done in the C/C++ Offtopic group. Please take your discussion/questions there.