can anyone in this group tell me about ebook / book regarding c++ with MxNet ?? if there is someone can inform me about this i'm gonna buy this book in Amazon

hey can i send link of coding ninjas question here? having some problem

@Rafiqshaik07 You can start with this guide (online free): https://beej.us/guide/bgc/ A good book to follow is "C: The complete reference" of Herbert Schildt. And again... Most of C harsh is about pointers, memory and difference about stack and heap. Once you master it, the language is a breeze.

No it is not. That book is riddled with errors. Please look at the Resources section for this group to know what the recommended books for learning C are. The link to recommended books for C is : https://t.me/cpp20programming/183

hey can i send link of coding ninjas question here? having some problem

Yes you can. Also post a pastebin link to your attempted solution. Someone might be able to help.

https://www.codingninjas.com/codestudio/problem-of-the-day/hard

https://www.codingninjas.com/codestudio/problem-of-the-day/hard

this is the question

https://pastebin.com/YYLj2TJm

https://pastebin.com/YYLj2TJm

10 out of 11 test cases passed ... i cant find out why the last test case is failing

https://www.codingninjas.com/codestudio/problem-of-the-day/hard

I can see it is a DP question. But the site expects us to create login credentials. Instead paste the question on some pastebin site as well and post the link here. Saves all the readers here a lot of time.

Usually if your problem passes most of the test cases, it is the case that boundary conditions are not satisfied. Look for edge cases like a minimum input size satisfying the constraints, maximum input size and corner cases.

Hello

Please message me group please

No it is not. That book is riddled with errors. Please look at the Resources section for this group to know what the recommended books for learning C are. The link to recommended books for C is : https://t.me/cpp20programming/183

riddled with errors? show examples... it is on 4th+ edition. Also when I say that books mixing C and C++ induce to errors I point them, as some "best C++ practices" are not C best practices, and limit programmers of fully use the language, also spreading prejudices.

Okay

\report Hannar

Am so sorry

Hi

hi

I need 10 decimal places of precision, but the program outputs this. And the answer is 5.2360679774, and the program gives out 5.5 .. I don’t quite understand what to do https://pastebin.com/tfj0ttRE

can anybody help, please ?

riddled with errors? show examples... it is on 4th+ edition. Also when I say that books mixing C and C++ induce to errors I point them, as some "best C++ practices" are not C best practices, and limit programmers of fully use the language, also spreading prejudices.

Herbert Schildt as an author is panned by both C and C++ programmers alike. He is known to write books that don't confirm to either the C standard or the C++ standard. He is often referred to as BullSchildt by experienced C/C++ programmers who have had to make their juniors unlearn a lot of bad practices and ideas they picked up from Herbert Schildt's books. The recommended books list for C that I shared above teach only C and not C++. Likewise the recommended book list for C++ in the same resources section teach C++ not as C with classes.

@Rafiqshaik07 You can start with this guide (online free): https://beej.us/guide/bgc/ A good book to follow is "C: The complete reference" of Herbert Schildt. And again... Most of C harsh is about pointers, memory and difference about stack and heap. Once you master it, the language is a breeze.

Please do not recommend Schildt, I do not know how this guy gets published

Please do not recommend Schildt, I do not know how this guy gets published

Why? What he says that is wrong? It is horrible when you ask something or even someone answers and says: do not this... when it is not something about common sense. Which are the arguments?

Why? What he says that is wrong? It is horrible when you ask something or even someone answers and says: do not this... when it is not something about common sense. Which are the arguments?

Instead of just say NO, it is better to share why no... I need to dig to find this: http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/schildt.html And while most of its arguments are valid, I think that it is still better to read a wrong thing that works with another clear text saying why not, as it will make me more aware about traps (that I could read in someone code that "works" and not perceive). My 2c

can anybody help, please ?

🥺

O sent a code, it has been re-uploaded as a file

O sent a code, it has been re-uploaded as a file

Hello everyone, in this code... why the values are different but the address is one?

Hello everyone, in this code... why the values are different but the address is one?

Probably because you assigned py to px???

Hello everyone, in this code... why the values are different but the address is one?

x =5, y=6 i have point px and pointer py that point to x and y respectively now i say that px should point to what py points to, -> it should have the same memory i print x and y so i get the original values px and py are equal because i have written px = py

x =5, y=6 i have point px and pointer py that point to x and y respectively now i say that px should point to what py points to, -> it should have the same memory i print x and y so i get the original values px and py are equal because i have written px = py

means that the address can hold more than one value?

means that the address can hold more than one value?

no, not at all, but you have 4 "memories" in this case you have int x int y pointer px pointer py so if you set them to 5 6 address to 5 address as px you have 4 addresses that hold x,y hold 5 and 6, then two pointers that have the same value

no, not at all, but you have 4 "memories" in this case you have int x int y pointer px pointer py so if you set them to 5 6 address to 5 address as px you have 4 addresses that hold x,y hold 5 and 6, then two pointers that have the same value

ok thanks very much

Why? What he says that is wrong? It is horrible when you ask something or even someone answers and says: do not this... when it is not something about common sense. Which are the arguments?

Bad advice and examples that rely on undefined behaviour presented as "best practice", bad chapter organisation, very old code style and more

Instead of just say NO, it is better to share why no... I need to dig to find this: http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/schildt.html And while most of its arguments are valid, I think that it is still better to read a wrong thing that works with another clear text saying why not, as it will make me more aware about traps (that I could read in someone code that "works" and not perceive). My 2c

@QNeko I already found the answer and shared, well explained, point to point.

clang -o gcc gcc.c

@QNeko I already found the answer and shared, well explained, point to point.

Just looked at it, and even that answer has some mistakes but it is better than the original book

Well, actually they fix it lower in the comments

The "a byte is 8 bits" is one of my pet peeves if I am completely honest with you

The "a byte is 8 bits" is one of my pet peeves if I am completely honest with you

how can i use GCC to create an Assebly Bytes

The "a byte is 8 bits" is one of my pet peeves if I am completely honest with you

if you're talking about 9000 year ago byte versions, then you're probably right

if you're talking about 9000 year ago byte versions, then you're probably right

Nah, there are still architectures around with 32bit bytes

how can i use GCC to create an Assebly Bytes

😐😐😐gcc compile the file like assembly jusr binary is important

😐😐😐gcc compile the file like assembly jusr binary is important

what

Nah, there are still architectures around with 32bit bytes

mostly for specialized hardware and purpose

Nah, there are still architectures around with 32bit bytes

what, rly?

what

assembly compile to binary c compile to binary😐😐😐 no diffrent

assembly compile to binary c compile to binary😐😐😐 no diffrent

I know

how can i use GCC to create an Assebly Bytes

so what is this 😐😐😐

assembly compile to binary c compile to binary😐😐😐 no diffrent

gcc -c assembly_file.s -o object_file.o

assembly compile to binary c compile to binary😐😐😐 no diffrent

How can i use gcc to convert the C Code to Assembly bytes

gcc -c assembly_file.s -o object_file.o

😐

gcc -c assembly_file.s -o object_file.o

No

gcc -c assembly_file.s -o object_file.o

no

How can i use gcc to convert the C Code to Assembly bytes

That would be gcc -S my_c_source.c -o my_asm.s

That would be gcc -S my_c_source.c -o my_asm.s

Yes

That would be gcc -S my_c_source.c -o my_asm.s

No i asked how to convert it to assembly bytes

no

I read "assembly compile to binary" and that is what I provide first

How can i use gcc to convert the C Code to Assembly bytes

after compile defualt it's going to be a banary code or assembly byte or whatever you sayd 😐

after compile defualt it's going to be a banary code or assembly byte or whatever you sayd 😐

I want Pure Assembly bytes not an executable

No i asked how to convert it to assembly bytes

what do you even mean by assembly bytes? Assembly text? Executable binary? Object file? Use the proper terms

what do you even mean by assembly bytes? Assembly text? Executable binary? Object file? Use the proper terms

I mean opcodes

That would be gcc -S my_c_source.c -o my_asm.s

This compiles C to assembly

it works with C++ too

I want Pure Assembly bytes not an executable

😐😐😐😐aha😐😐😐😐i don't know about that

what do you even mean by assembly bytes? Assembly text? Executable binary? Object file? Use the proper terms

convert c code to assembly code😐😂

convert c code to assembly code😐😂

I used an assembler to create a program in opcodes that i have placed at the start of the first section of a usb drive to boot it into Microsoft

I used an assembler to create a program in opcodes that i have placed at the start of the first section of a usb drive to boot it into Microsoft

convert c code to assembly code😐😂

Oh, you want executable code that is not packaged for an operating system for that you will need to build a cross-compiler for either gcc or clang

Oh, you want executable code that is not packaged for an operating system for that you will need to build a cross-compiler for either gcc or clang

he😐

Oh, you want executable code that is not packaged for an operating system for that you will need to build a cross-compiler for either gcc or clang

Yes what is a cross compiler

Oh, you want executable code that is not packaged for an operating system for that you will need to build a cross-compiler for either gcc or clang

or she

look on the OSDev wiki, it has a tutorial for that

Yes what is a cross compiler

LLVM

look on the OSDev wiki, it has a tutorial for that

I also need help to compile a plugin called FRIEND for IDA

I also need help to compile a plugin called FRIEND for IDA

wait i will open this video and send them link for you if iran internet let me opening youtube

I also need help to compile a plugin called FRIEND for IDA

https://wiki.osdev.org/GCC_Cross-Compiler Look for the triplet matching your platform, with OS being either none or unknown