It is like working for nothing xD

But I think I get what you want me to do

You want me to create a game, that everyone plays and once they do play it and are addicted then yi should RUGPULL them by making things in-game affordable

It is like working for nothing xD

Nah, if you want to succeed in game dev, make something good. Rug pullers succeed only in short term

League of legends is rugpulling since ever

Anyway, in gamedev, knowing C++ opens a lot of doors

C++ is also used in finance and aerospace

Finance ? Do you mean crypto? Aerospace do you mean NASA ?

Finance I mean Euronext, DOW, and stock exchange. Crypto too but that's hot garbage. By aerospace I mean aerospace+defence: NASA, Boeing, Airbus, Thales, Lockheed Martin, Safran...

Crypto is not hot garbage

It... It is. It is currency backed by energy waste

Bitcoin alone uses more energy than all means of electric transportation combined

I would say games consume more energy

Nope, games are actually not that power hungry

It's the quantity

Crypto is not garbage, you can just take the financial market implement it in stellar and you are done

Except theft becomes impossible to punish

Games are scam of time

C++ is unlikely to go anywhere in the near future

Just like any form of art

I'm not familiar with C++... But are there things it can do that C cannot do??? In regards to game development... And the things it can do...C cannot find a way around it?

Abstract complex things. C is very good at performance but pretty terrible at abstracting details. The mental charge of C tends to grow faster than the mental charge of C++. That is particularly true in projects with more than say 120_000 lines of code

Crypto currencies are a speculative bubble. When it collapses some people will be sleeping in the streets

Crypto currencies are a speculative bubble. When it collapses some people will be sleeping in the streets

Actually no that is not the case

Dollar and EUR can crash too

I understand tho...you can't logic your way around it with C??

Speculation on currency value is regulated to prevent crashes that would ruin people. That is the point

Europe is already ruined

HI PALS

HI PALS

https://www.onlinegdb.com/ my codes output will be 65834 using InsertAtTheEnd(),InsertAtBeginning () and InsertAtTheEnd(). in DeleteTheFirstElement() funtion when i use current in the function declaration no deletion is made on 65834 my expectation from this code is to get 5834 as output but when i use                                                                                                                                              void DeleteTheFirstElement(struct node** head_ref) { //in tabe kar nmikonad(node ebtedaie ra hazf nmikonad struct node* current=*head_ref; (*head_ref)=(*head_ref)->next; }                                                                                                                                                          as my function declaration with using *head_ref as my variable, i get the desired output:5834 i want to know why i cant use current? and why i must use (*head_ref)?

HOWS YOU

https://archivist.nekoit.xyz/readable-code-a-guide-to-absolute-beginners/

I was asking for c

I was asking for c

I was asking for c

https://www.onlinegdb.com/ my codes output will be 65834 using InsertAtTheEnd(),InsertAtBeginning () and InsertAtTheEnd(). in DeleteTheFirstElement() funtion when i use current in the function declaration no deletion is made on 65834 my expectation from this code is to get 5834 as output but when i use                                                                                                                                              void DeleteTheFirstElement(struct node** head_ref) { //in tabe kar nmikonad(node ebtedaie ra hazf nmikonad struct node* current=*head_ref; (*head_ref)=(*head_ref)->next; }                                                                                                                                                          as my function declaration with using *head_ref as my variable, i get the desired output:5834 i want to know why i cant use current? and why i must use (*head_ref)?

https://onlinegdb.com/_bB6-k2JP This is the right link

Not quite (also I am in Europe)

Lol prices in Germany rise 200%

https://onlinegdb.com/_bB6-k2JP This is the right link

Why you use double pointer(**).

I was just practising using it

You need to return pointer to new first element after deleting

https://www.onlinegdb.com/ my codes output will be 65834 using InsertAtTheEnd(),InsertAtBeginning () and InsertAtTheEnd(). in DeleteTheFirstElement() funtion when i use current in the function declaration no deletion is made on 65834 my expectation from this code is to get 5834 as output but when i use                                                                                                                                              void DeleteTheFirstElement(struct node** head_ref) { //in tabe kar nmikonad(node ebtedaie ra hazf nmikonad struct node* current=*head_ref; (*head_ref)=(*head_ref)->next; }                                                                                                                                                          as my function declaration with using *head_ref as my variable, i get the desired output:5834 i want to know why i cant use current? and why i must use (*head_ref)?

Lol prices in Germany rise 200%

Lol prices in Germany rise 200%

Nah, the only thing that rise like that was fuel

Gas prices?