MIT?

Your English is fine! Don't worry

thanks, i will check

MIT?

How old are you?

im 14

But I need to check it out MIT probably has a good course I'm just triggered by "watching videos" because there're a lot of awful courses that were just made to make money on ads

These series are OK

Then cool, learn C, it is good... if you're above 24, forget about C... pointless to learn at that point.

so u think is better if i start with C?

C with class，It's not as good as pure C

Yes, you don't plan to jump into programming right away so it is better to learn C, so you'll learn how programs actually work... But if a person wants start his job and he/she is 24, they really don't have to time to learn how program actually work, they want to go on with it.

Yes, you don't plan to jump into programming right away so it is better to learn C, so you'll learn how programs actually work... But if a person wants start his job and he/she is 24, they really don't have to time to learn how program actually work, they want to go on with it.

i already know some python and about 3 month ago, i tried c, but it bored me...

Yes, you don't plan to jump into programming right away so it is better to learn C, so you'll learn how programs actually work... But if a person wants start his job and he/she is 24, they really don't have to time to learn how program actually work, they want to go on with it.

And C++ is not C with classes

I never said C has class or word "class or classes" lol

He has a lot of time

Is learning C a waste of time?

C doesn't teach "how programs work". It teaches "how programs shouldn't be written"

I ask you, what is the underlying principle of malloc

See if you program in Python in the end or JavaScript, it wouldn't really matter if you know C or not... but what C would teach you is how stacks work, how variables are passed, what really is a string, what is an array... etc.

I don't wish I had created a thread for nothing ... in case sorry

Language is just a tool. Learning a language is not just to learn "language". If you don't care about the bottom layer when learning C / C + +, you might as well learn Java or HTML

Language is just a tool. Learning a language is not just to learn "language". If you don't care about the bottom layer when learning C / C + +, you might as well learn Java or HTML

Before C + + 11, wasn't C + + a superset of C

start by watching c++ weekly back to back :)

I was too rude, i'm sry, but I still stick to my ideas

That's not a good advice C++ Weekly is an unstructured pile of C++ facts that are rather made for intermediate viewers

fair point, still educational once you get to a certain level though

so which is the principal difference between c and c++?

so which is the principal difference between c and c++?

as someone who learned from c++98, i still find alll the new stuff difficult to implement

What do you mean by "difficult to implement"? From the compilers point of view?

Mostly classes... but there are few more things when it comes to newer versions of C++

no, like finding uses for the concepts which are supposed to make my life easier ... like auto

okay and why would anyone want to learn c rather than c++? and why one before the other?

thats why i do ;)

Because many people learn the basis of C as the beginning of programming

so, while there are people about ... converting between uint8_t[] and signed char[] ..... only way is reinterpret_cast ?

I haven't used it, but it seems to be written in Python?

Are you reading this code on some web page? In all likelihood it may be a mistake in that website's code which escaped code inside code snippets. C++ doesn't recognise > < etc. Those are HTML entities.