sorry iam using artix. try list file from your mingw packages iam sure you can find requested dll n copy it to your project folder

I will try

I writed x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -o main64.exe gen.cpp for compile

g++ gen.cpp -o main64.exe -lstdc++

Anytime

Hmm.. How i can compile for x32 windows system?

try g++ -m32 for 32bit

On void needs download glibc-devel-32bit

Suka, your name soundly like russian swear word сука))

yeah i know hehe. in indonesia it just "like" like in i like pizza hehe or also means happy hehe

funny

string s; getline(cin,s); char *p=strtok((char*)s.c_str()," "); char a[10]; strcpy(a,p);

If you are coding in C++, use C++ methods rather than using C functions.

Read the documentation for strtok and find out what it does to its first argument. It is Undefined Behavior to change a const char* string.

If you are coding in C++, use C++ methods rather than using C functions.

string s; getline(cin,s); char *p=strtok((char*)s.c_str()," "); char a[10]; strcpy(a,p);

i don't know what does that mean. i followed a tutorial and that uses strtok

i don't know what does that mean. i followed a tutorial and that uses strtok

Just for reference, any header that begins with a 'c' is most likely a C header. You should seldom use them in C++ code barring very fee exceptional circumstances. They are there for historical reasons. strtok is defined in the header <cstring>. It is the C++ version of the C header file string.h. C++ string offers many methods in the string class which can do this much faster than strtok and in a safer way.

What should I use instead of strtok

Check the documentation for std::string. You can use stringstream as well.

So if the string is say "a b c" strtok will convert it to "a\0b\0c\0"

Ok I will check. Documentation are on cplusplusrefrence right?

Yes. But the last '\0' is not written by strtok. It was originally there. Like I said before changing the string returned through c_str is undefined Behavior. You can use data() method of string class instead. This would work in place of c_str.

#include<stdio.h> #include<malloc.h> #include<stdlib.h> typedef struct{ struct tree *right; int info; struct tree *left; }tree_type; int num; tree_type *root=NULL,*temp; char opt; do{ printf("enter the elements\n"); scanf("%d",&num); temp=create(num); if(root==NULL) root=temp; else insert(root,temp); printf("for continue y/n"); scanf("\t%c",&opt); { while(Opt=='y'); printf("the inorder transversal of the tree is ........\n"); } tree_type *create(int num) { tree_type *temp; temp=(tree_type*)malloc(size of (tree_type)); if(temp==NULL) printf("not enough memory"); else { temp->info=num; temp->left=NULL; temp->right=NULL; } return temp; } void insert(tree_type *root,tree_type *temp) { if(temp->info<root->info) { if(root->left=NULL); root->left=temp; else insert(root->left,temp); { else if(root->right=NULL) root->right=temp; else insert(root->right,temp); } } } }

If the translation is by some guy who is a known name in the C++ community from your country, then by all means go ahead. You can look up the translator's name and find his reputation. A decent Stackoverflow profile or a GitHub page with many starred projects is usually a good indicator

Can anyone please help me in downloading mingw? Pleas

#Puzzle char a = 'a'; a.~char(); //Compiler Error using Char = char; //typedef char Char; char a = 'a'; a.~Char(); //Ok Why does C++ allow the latter but not the former?

I am guessing is that related to destructor

In both the codes, an attempt is made to call the destructor. So I don't understand what you are trying to say.

Yeah I meant constructors and destructors start with a Cap So thats my answer I am not confident on this one.

Not really. class a{ public: a() = default; ~a() = default; }; This code would work fine.

#Puzzle char a = 'a'; a.~char(); //Compiler Error using Char = char; //typedef char Char; char a = 'a'; a.~Char(); //Ok Why does C++ allow the latter but not the former?

Can someone explain how this works? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/standard-library/overloading-the-output-operator-for-your-own-classes How can we define the function ostream& operator<<(ostream& os, const Date& dt) if it's not already declared inside the ostream class? And why does it have an ostream& os parameter when it only needs the Date& dt to display the date, and can return *this to support chaining?

perhaps compiler allow the latter because it use custom alias not using built-in datattype? or perhaps c++ by default create deconstructor function for any type except for primitives? hehe cmiiw

Can someone explain how this works? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/standard-library/overloading-the-output-operator-for-your-own-classes How can we define the function ostream& operator<<(ostream& os, const Date& dt) if it's not already declared inside the ostream class? And why does it have an ostream& os parameter when it only needs the Date& dt to display the date, and can return *this to support chaining?

But the question is why? Why can't the compiler figure out that Char is an alias for char and disallow that too? It is easy to do that.

#Puzzle char a = 'a'; a.~char(); //Compiler Error using Char = char; //typedef char Char; char a = 'a'; a.~Char(); //Ok Why does C++ allow the latter but not the former?

Because you have declared char as a class and ~Char() is a destructor called.

I have not declared char as a class. It is a built-in type.

(I maybe totally off on terminology) You are defining Char as char, which makes Char as class with char as it's definition, so you have a destructor for it now.

any recommendations for gui libraries?

No. Char is just a typedef or an alias. In most of the compiler implementations Char will be replaced by char in the compilation phase. And yet this code is allowed.

Seems like using keyword makes turns everything in to class like...

Tried it with int and it worked too.

Can anyone please help me in downloading mingw? Pleas

No it doesn't turn into a class. Like I said it is an alias. So a.~Char() will be replaced by a.~char() but still allowed to compile There is a reason why this is allowed. I want to see if someone can give me the reason.

Can anyone please help me in downloading mingw? Pleas

No it doesn't turn into a class. Like I said it is an alias. So a.~Char() will be replaced by a.~char() but still allowed to compile There is a reason why this is allowed. I want to see if someone can give me the reason.