Sure I know TC I wanna see differences when using recursion, and DP same goes for any other flush-ing

Sure I know TC I wanna see differences when using recursion, and DP same goes for any other flush-ing

Can anyone help me with my assignment

Please, it's for a project that I have to deliver by tomorrow🙏🙏

in show function second last line

https://dpaste.org/dLHD same problem only onr time input enter who will play first ??? i answer this but there is one more question that computer doesn't ask the question is enterr position and symbol for yourself

Check line 35 in your code. The &pa is within the string literal. It should be outside. Also there is no point in including whitespace characters like /t and /n in scanf formatting string unless you are going to enter spaces in the input upfront. Even if you did, only one of them is enough. Check line 58. You are probably using == instead of = main is supposed to return int and not void. conio.h is not a standard header. So when you include it and use it, it makes it even more difficult for people here to test your code. Use a decent compiler and pay heed to the warnings.

hi everyone, can anyone find me a link/reference, any source to put my hands on web development using C language only, I know it's little out of the blue, just wanna get my hands dirty for fun

Hello, How did you learn c n c++?

if((a[0]=='x'&&a[1]=='x'&&a[2]=='x') || if(a[0]=='x'&&a[3]=='x'&&a[6]=='x') || if(a[0]=='x'&&a[1]=='x'&&a[4]=='x') ) else if((a[0]=='0'&&a[1]=='0'&&a[2]=='0') || if(a[0]=='0'&&a[3]=='0'&&a[6]=='0') || if(a[0]=='0'&&a[1]=='0'&&a[4]=='x')) error: expected expression before ' if' please help i am very very closeeee

if((a[0]=='x'&&a[1]=='x'&&a[2]=='x') || if(a[0]=='x'&&a[3]=='x'&&a[6]=='x') || if(a[0]=='x'&&a[1]=='x'&&a[4]=='x') ) else if((a[0]=='0'&&a[1]=='0'&&a[2]=='0') || if(a[0]=='0'&&a[3]=='0'&&a[6]=='0') || if(a[0]=='0'&&a[1]=='0'&&a[4]=='x')) error: expected expression before ' if' please help i am very very closeeee

Tic tac toe right??

https://pastebin.com/Gy3xxSQv

do i put it after the CFLAGS?

"CFLAGS = -Wall -c " ?

Yeah

ok I added it ... now it seems that the first file compiles without problems ... instead for compiling the second it gives me: make: *** No rule to make target 'memorizer.c', needed by 'memorizer.o'. Stop.

What was the make target you used?

make -f Makefile.mak

Your makefile says memorizzatore.c while in your post you are referring to memorizer.c

I had already put it on ... https://pastebin.com/JF3qrQ9K

is the same

in the sense that I can translate it into my language ... obviously I don't pretend that there is an automatic translation haha

The compiler error you gave me says "No rule to make target 'memorizer.c'. The makefile you shared shows target memorizzatore.o depends on target memorizzatore.c and there is no memorizer.c or memorizer.o there. So the problem is with your file names. Go fix those.

it always tells me: gcc -lpthread esame.o memorizzatore.o /usr/bin/ld: memorizzatore.o: in function `main': /home/marco/memorizzatore.c:11: multiple definition of `main'; esame.o:/home/marco/esame.c:76: first defined here /usr/bin/ld: esame.o: in function `main': /home/marco/esame.c:111: undefined reference to `pthread_create' /usr/bin/ld: /home/marco/esame.c:122: undefined reference to `pthread_join' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [Makefile.mak:9: abc] Error 1

And by the way $(LP) and $(PT) need to be added to the command for target abc. You dont need these libraries while compiling. You need them while linking.

Now I can see that you have renamed the files as suggested. The error now is that you have defined main function in both esame.c and memorizattore.c. How can there be 2 main() functions for your application. Delete one of them.

And you havent read this message either. I asked you to move $(LP) and $(PT) to the linking stage. They are not used in the compiling stage. The second error that the linker shows is because of that.

They are actually two separate files that communicate with a pipe

They are actually two separate files that communicate with a pipe

I was wrong to explain, in reality they are 2 separate files .. I just have to compile them separately

I learn C++, and who can say me nice course of C++?

I feel strings in c and c++ not as user friendly as in python or java! Why so?

That's not an easy question that can be answered in one sentence. About C strings for example: https://www.quora.com/Why-do-strings-have-to-be-so-complicated-in-C About C++ std::string, it's not as user friendly as string types in languages that was created after C++, but can you give some examples what exactly you feel not friendly in C++ strings?

That's not an easy question that can be answered in one sentence. About C strings for example: https://www.quora.com/Why-do-strings-have-to-be-so-complicated-in-C About C++ std::string, it's not as user friendly as string types in languages that was created after C++, but can you give some examples what exactly you feel not friendly in C++ strings?

I mean using pointers and pointers to pointers, array of pointers, always having logic construct of strings in mind while initilising charecter arrays, input and output stream all these make usage of strings complicated! Actually i being frm mechanical background learnt python first and then now i am learning C, C++! I think its reverse engineering kinda and i feel C, c++ strings not as natural as in python and java

In C++ you don't have to think about pointers when dealing with strings (but you still allowed to). std::string should cover pretty much all that you've mentioned.

Hi! Apart from shift operators used in IO, are bitwise operators (very) useful? I was reading about it and it seems bewildering for me.

You mean bitwise and(&), or(|), xor(^)? Or something else?

You mean bitwise and(&), or(|), xor(^)? Or something else?

Hi! Apart from shift operators used in IO, are bitwise operators (very) useful? I was reading about it and it seems bewildering for me.

"|" is useful in cpp20 range library. https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/ranges In addition, you can overload the operator if you like. It can sometimes cause confusion.

why does upper_bound work with unsorted arrays as well?

why does upper_bound work with unsorted arrays as well?

Read my message above and more importantly read about makefiles before attempting to use them. I cant teach you everything from scratch.

upper_bound doesnt require a completely sorted array. It will work on a partitioned array as long as the element that you are searching for say v, partitions the array into two parts...those that are less than or equal to v (assuming you are using the default < operator) and those that are greater than v. A sorted array satisfies this criteria

ok I reviewed the makefiles and fixed mine but it still doesn't work ... it tells me "make: Nothing to be done for 'all'." ....https://pastebin.com/idLpy8Yp