I think MISRA, CERT are more advanced and not always necessary It's better to start what I listed

Also, C++ is advanced. MISRA and CERT define some rules which are really good to obey and guide us to have better and more maintainable code. C++ Best practices on Github? what does even mean? Also, All the conferences talks at CppCon about Having Better C++ Code just was unnecessarily long versions of: - Effective C++ by Scott Mayer - Programming Principles and Practice Using C++ by Bjarne Stroustrup. - Some papers in openstd. So, I think watching them is a waste of time. Sorry, I don't really agree with what you listed.

https://github.com/lefticus/cppbestpractices

Also, C++ is advanced. MISRA and CERT define some rules which are really good to obey and guide us to have better and more maintainable code. C++ Best practices on Github? what does even mean? Also, All the conferences talks at CppCon about Having Better C++ Code just was unnecessarily long versions of: - Effective C++ by Scott Mayer - Programming Principles and Practice Using C++ by Bjarne Stroustrup. - Some papers in openstd. So, I think watching them is a waste of time. Sorry, I don't really agree with what you listed.

Believe me, reading those things is just waste of time: https://github.com/lefticus/cppbestpractices/blob/master/04-Considering_Safety.md#const-as-much-as-possible

Believe me, reading those things is just waste of time: https://github.com/lefticus/cppbestpractices/blob/master/04-Considering_Safety.md#const-as-much-as-possible

If every C++ developer followed these basic rules, there would be so much less C++ code

If C++ developers don't know those rules when finishing The C++ Programming Language, It's better to don't write C++ code.

It's not necessary to read Stroustroup to be a good C++ developer

Yes, and that's way i suggest to reading: - C++ Core Guide Line. - MISRA. - CERT after reading The C++ Programming Language.

After that, your are welcome to be a Junior C++ Programmer.

You have really high demands for junior developers

It's not necessary to read Stroustroup to be a good C++ developer

😂Why? you don't need to create or discover the existence of the universe theory. All you need to do is just reading some books to be a junior programmer. Then you could start working and gain knowledge. I except every Junior programmer to at least read those books.

😂Why? you don't need to create or discover the existence of the universe theory. All you need to do is just reading some books to be a junior programmer. Then you could start working and gain knowledge. I except every Junior programmer to at least read those books.

Reading is useless without understanding

😂Why? you don't need to create or discover the existence of the universe theory. All you need to do is just reading some books to be a junior programmer. Then you could start working and gain knowledge. I except every Junior programmer to at least read those books.

After that, your are welcome to be a Junior C++ Programmer.

You don't accept juniors that didn't read Stroustroup but can code in C++ and for example know some advanced techniques like SFINAE, CRTP?

I don't except and don't ask juniors to write HPC codes or setup a Linux kernel without a hand. A junior must know the fundamentals very well after that could learn those advanced topics you mentioned. Believe me, I see a lot of those programmers how first going for such advanced topics and think they know what they do, but they don't.

You don't accept juniors that didn't read Stroustroup but can code in C++ and for example know some advanced techniques like SFINAE, CRTP?

I would think about accepting a junior who flexes with their template-related knowledge :) As juniors usually tend to apply the most complicated solutions they know

a junior dev coding design patterns in c++ is more dangerous than a monkey with a machete

I would think about accepting a junior who flexes with their template-related knowledge :) As juniors usually tend to apply the most complicated solutions they know

There's one thing about interviewing and teaching, that many interviewers and teachers see experience of other people through their own experience. Some people have written OSes and think that "any good programmer should be able to write an OS", others have read some books and think that every good programmed should have them read. And obviously every one of them can't be right.

Most interviews in good companies have a technical section that seperates the garbage from the good

#include <iostream.h> #include <conio.h> void main() { clscr(); int num1, num2, sum; cout << "\n Enter Two Numbers ::: "; cin >> num1 >> num2; sum = num1 + num2; cout << "\n " << num1 << " + " << num2 << " = " << sum; getch(); }

#include <iostream.h> #include <conio.h> void main() { clscr(); int num1, num2, sum; cout << "\n Enter Two Numbers ::: "; cin >> num1 >> num2; sum = num1 + num2; cout << "\n " << num1 << " + " << num2 << " = " << sum; getch(); }

How do you learn C++? what is your resource?

How do you learn C++? what is your resource?

How do you learn C++? what is your resource?

Lol it's SO bad

Read online from www.programiz.com

That is Awful. If you want to learn Programming and The C++ Programming Language, consider reading: https://www.stroustrup.com/programming.html Which is a complete book to starting programming and learning a programming language from the Creator of C++ not some random people on the internet.

That is Awful. If you want to learn Programming and The C++ Programming Language, consider reading: https://www.stroustrup.com/programming.html Which is a complete book to starting programming and learning a programming language from the Creator of C++ not some random people on the internet.

Thanks for the advice

I wanted correction .. please show me were i made errors..🙏🙏

You'r welcome, check this to see an edited version of your code.

don't use conio.h, it is dos-specific and not official AFAIK use <iostream> header (without .h), the one with .h is old and not supported declare local variables as closer as possible to the first use, int sum = num1 + num2, there's no need to declare them at the top of the function. use std namespace explicitly (std::cout, std::cin)

Hello, I am trying to overload + and += operators. I have a class Building that has variables storing floors and entrances. What I am trying to do is to overload + and += in a way that 1) object + int change the number of floors 2) int + object change number of entrances I have already managed to implement the 1) but I struggle with 2). To my understanding 2) should be defined outside of the class as the left argument of the function will NOT be part of the class. How can I do 2)? I tried many things but I failed. For example: Building& operator+(int lhs, const Building & rhs){ unsigned tmp = lhs + get_entrBuilt(rhs); rhs.set_entrBuilt(tmp); return *rhs; }

Hello, I am trying to overload + and += operators. I have a class Building that has variables storing floors and entrances. What I am trying to do is to overload + and += in a way that 1) object + int change the number of floors 2) int + object change number of entrances I have already managed to implement the 1) but I struggle with 2). To my understanding 2) should be defined outside of the class as the left argument of the function will NOT be part of the class. How can I do 2)? I tried many things but I failed. For example: Building& operator+(int lhs, const Building & rhs){ unsigned tmp = lhs + get_entrBuilt(rhs); rhs.set_entrBuilt(tmp); return *rhs; }

+ is associative but if I am not mistaken an operator can be overloaded to accept different number of arguments, in this situation it is only int and int + object

I agree with both of you but this is an assignment so I have to try

I agree with both of you but this is an assignment so I have to try

yes, it'd be easier if I show you the entire code but I don't think I can paste it here. do you want to see it, i can paste it somewhere

I have this in the header file (outside of the class) Building& operator+(int, const Building &); and here is the definition in the cpp file: Building& operator+(int lhs, const Building & rhs){ unsigned tmp = lhs + get_entrBuilt(rhs); rhs.set_entrBuilt(tmp); return *rhs; }

'get_entrBuilt' was not declared in this scope unsigned tmp = lhs + get_entrBuilt(rhs);

Check this out: http://ix.io/2UQK

I have this in the header file (outside of the class) Building& operator+(int, const Building &); and here is the definition in the cpp file: Building& operator+(int lhs, const Building & rhs){ unsigned tmp = lhs + get_entrBuilt(rhs); rhs.set_entrBuilt(tmp); return *rhs; }

does this also count as rickrolling? :)

okay, so there is some progress! I changed the code to: Building& operator+(int lhs, Building & rhs){ unsigned tmp = rhs.get_flBuilt() + lhs; rhs.set_flBuilt(tmp); return *rhs; } the error now is: no match for 'operator*' (operand type is 'Building') basically I am not allow to just return *rhs;

okay, so there is some progress! I changed the code to: Building& operator+(int lhs, Building & rhs){ unsigned tmp = rhs.get_flBuilt() + lhs; rhs.set_flBuilt(tmp); return *rhs; } the error now is: no match for 'operator*' (operand type is 'Building') basically I am not allow to just return *rhs;

now it compiled! thank you! vlad doc, I am not really sure what dereferencing a reference is :/ can you explain it?