It's a fact that C has less overhead than C++

It depends on your code and compiler, but generally speaking I think yes. + This coast makes the coding time less.

That's not true

I'll keep referring to one example Jason Turner wanted to rewrite Doom to C++. It was a huge task and the only thing he did is fixing compiler errors for C++ compiler and that lead to 10% increase in performance

I'll keep referring to one example Jason Turner wanted to rewrite Doom to C++. It was a huge task and the only thing he did is fixing compiler errors for C++ compiler and that lead to 10% increase in performance

Just fixing errors

Well, i wouldn't recommend you writing a billing system in C. Although it is possible

Sorry, noisy in here, please tell me the problem again

From here FFFFFFxxxxTTTTTTTxxxxFFFFTTTT999 you read 31 characters into the array, so there's only one 9 left, and hence num is 9. The last two items of the array are 9 as well. when printing num, try adding a new a space before and after and see how there will be no 999

Can you explain why?

C++ has more features to make compile-time computations and thankfully for that C++ compilers have more information to make optimizations with

From here FFFFFFxxxxTTTTTTTxxxxFFFFTTTT999 you read 31 characters into the array, so there's only one 9 left, and hence num is 9. The last two items of the array are 9 as well. when printing num, try adding a new a space before and after and see how there will be no 999

Ok

C++ has more features to make compile-time computations and thankfully for that C++ compilers have more information to make optimizations with

Even though if you need exact same performance as C or better, you need to exclude exceptions and RTTI fftom the code

Even though if you need exact same performance as C or better, you need to exclude exceptions and RTTI fftom the code

And virtual methods

And virtual methods

They are zero-cost

If you need runtime polymorphism in C, you need to implement virtual table :)

From here FFFFFFxxxxTTTTTTTxxxxFFFFTTTT999 you read 31 characters into the array, so there's only one 9 left, and hence num is 9. The last two items of the array are 9 as well. when printing num, try adding a new a space before and after and see how there will be no 999

You were right, I read too much data, was supposed to read 29 and not 30

Game development folks satanize virtual methods. They tried to avoid whenever they can.

You were right, I read too much data, was supposed to read 29 and not 30

Thanks

I'll keep referring to one example Jason Turner wanted to rewrite Doom to C++. It was a huge task and the only thing he did is fixing compiler errors for C++ compiler and that lead to 10% increase in performance

I have a question on this. He could get a 10% increase over C?

I have a question on this. He could get a 10% increase over C?

I don't think he has actually done a benchmark on it.

Just use vim. https://code-vault.net/lesson/4wy66ezt7u:1610303902122 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pjBseGfEPU

I don't think he has actually done a benchmark on it.

He had, there were a benchmark, he showed it running

I have a question on this. He could get a 10% increase over C?

He did

He had, there were a benchmark, he showed it running

In his stream?

In his stream?

Yep

Yep

are you referring to fps counter?

Or maybe there was a separate video about it

I would not consider this a benchmark as he mentioned himself.

are you referring to fps counter?

That's I'm not aware of, I can't recall

If I am not mistaken he used a VM to execute it, and the setup changed so I would not rely on these numbers.

I think there was a recorded play and he compared time c and cpp version ran it I hope you understand what I mean, I'm not good at English right now

C is very very unlimited, but does not bring much functionalility on its own, like classes. C++ has classes and templating and stuff and is still as unlimited as C

You can litterally insert assembly code 😉

It's a fact that C has less overhead than C++

How so?

It's a fact that C has less overhead than C++

not always. for example compare template sort with C sort style

Best app for coding C++ or C

Best app for coding C++ or C

Please tell

Best app for coding C++ or C

Qt creator If you are a beginner go for code blocks

How is C4droid for coding in phone ?

How is C4droid for coding in phone ?

why would you code in phone in the first place

Qt creator If you are a beginner go for code blocks

or just better use vscode

How is C4droid for coding in phone ?

C4droid starts out with TinyCC + dietlibc, or something like that... It can be upgraded to GCC or clang I think.

why would you code in phone in the first place

I used Papers when I learned C++ the first time

I used Papers when I learned C++ the first time

Nice, you can now use computers

or just better use vscode

Nope Why?

Nope Why?

because code::blocks is a fossil

C4droid starts out with TinyCC + dietlibc, or something like that... It can be upgraded to GCC or clang I think.

I have my laptop but mING W compilor isn't working Thatswhy and I tried many time it isn't fixing

I have my laptop but mING W compilor isn't working Thatswhy and I tried many time it isn't fixing

Please help

It has a mini IDE of sorts, which may or may not be awkward... It has a terminal builtin but isn't as exte sive as Termux.

C4Droid is nice if you just want to test something quick when you are away from your pc

I have my laptop but mING W compilor isn't working Thatswhy and I tried many time it isn't fixing

Weird. did you try other compilers ? TinyCC, clang, dmc, any other ?

because code::blocks is a fossil

Someone with the intention of learning C++ doesn't want to concern him/herself with a lot of nuances like, they just want to learn the language

Weird. did you try other compilers ? TinyCC, clang, dmc, any other ?

No , I haven't use any other compilers

Guys , please suggest me a application other than VS code for coding C/c++

Guys , please suggest me a application other than VS code for coding C/c++

use code blocks

Someone with the intention of learning C++ doesn't want to concern him/herself with a lot of nuances like, they just want to learn the language

Someone with the intention of learning C++ also doesn't want an unintuitive and completely obsolete, uncustomizable, non-modern and just old software I mean Nobody uses DevC++ Why would anybody use Code::Blocks today?

Someone with the intention of learning C++ also doesn't want an unintuitive and completely obsolete, uncustomizable, non-modern and just old software I mean Nobody uses DevC++ Why would anybody use Code::Blocks today?

Cuz it's too simple

The only thing code::blocks did right was GCC integration, which is actually not bad

Why would I customize the UI if that what you are saking?

Why would I customize the UI if that what you are saking?

it's an example in a subjective way, I wouldn't code anywhere a dark theme is not available 😆 In a more general way, I wouldn't code with an old software if better options are available.

it's an example in a subjective way, I wouldn't code anywhere a dark theme is not available 😆 In a more general way, I wouldn't code with an old software if better options are available.

Since it's subjective preferences...

Since it's subjective preferences...

about UI yes, it is subjective but now, Code::Blocks worths the same as DevC++ does.

although, I'll admit C::B does have some nice features wxdesigner and some other useful utilities (gdb tools and other plugins as well) but there are better options to this date.

Come on C++ newbies just want to see the language

and get some basic explore

Come on C++ newbies just want to see the language

C++ isn't for newbies

C++ isn't for newbies

My first introduction to CS/programming world was with C++

My first introduction to CS/programming world was with C++

I'm sorry for you

ahhaha

The point is That over-complex language, yeah I agree But just basic things(function, classes...etc) is just fine

I'm sorry for you

I would do it again xD

My favorite technique is the parametric method, it works for both horizontal and vertical lines. void line(int x1, y1, x2, y2) { int steps = max(abs(x2-x1), abs(y2-y1)); if(steps == 0) { plot(x1, y1); return; } for(int i = 0; i <= steps; i++) { float t = (float)i / (float)steps; int x = round((1.0-t)*x1 + t*x2); int y = round((1.0-t)*y1 + t*y2); plot(x, y); } } This is a little slower than other techniques but easy to code.

The point is That over-complex language, yeah I agree But just basic things(function, classes...etc) is just fine

+ I can see the standard is towarding itself to a simple language Even there are some proposals for this although it got rejected but it may come to see the light again like Epochs

The point is That over-complex language, yeah I agree But just basic things(function, classes...etc) is just fine

yeah, obviously I'm talking about the more complex features of C++ but really, it's just too old now, and many of its features are just ridiculous nowadays

yeah, obviously I'm talking about the more complex features of C++ but really, it's just too old now, and many of its features are just ridiculous nowadays

Literally everyone is newbie to C++, whether an expert java developer or someone heard about programming before The first knowledge will get him only so far

But at some level they are both the same

But at some level they are both the same

Ehr... no, I don't think so

Literally everyone is newbie to C++, whether an expert java developer or someone heard about programming before The first knowledge will get him only so far

Sadly, yes

Ehr... no, I don't think so

Really? Tell me about someone moving from Pythone/js to C++

Really? Tell me about someone moving from Pythone/js to C++

Ah, you meant that

Ah, you meant that

Java has some OOP concepts, but not as complex as C++ virtual method/destructors, virtual/multiple inheritance, recursive inheritance...etc

Java has some OOP concepts, but not as complex as C++ virtual method/destructors, virtual/multiple inheritance, recursive inheritance...etc

What?

Template programming is just another dimension

Java has some OOP concepts, but not as complex as C++ virtual method/destructors, virtual/multiple inheritance, recursive inheritance...etc

this is not true lol