Also you can install support of C++ like what you can do in Android studio

Or you can install IDE for a language you need

It's for Android development...

Based on IntelliJ IDE

So what?

If you need C++, install CLion

Too slow for large codes😞

Too slow for large codes😞

And IDEA would be faster?😂😂

For jetbrains, use a SSD

jetbrains ides are the best ones

Buy one

128 gb cheap

Well then stick to vs code

But you can learn a lot from jetbrains ide

merhaba turkçe bilen var mı

use english

Even I asked as English no-one cares about my question :D

Anyone did parse messages over uart on rtos

sorry but that , after this ı will speak english

typedef struct Mail{ char senderAdress[40]; char recieverAdress[40]; char subject[20]; char date[11]; char message[100]; }Mail; typedef struct User{ char emailAdress[40]; struct Mail *next; }User;

Look this code where you can see some simple use of linked list, especially read comments to understand better the coding, enjoy: https://pastebin.com/wmuL89kw

I can not open the link

I can not open the link

Thank you very much for your effort I was able to open this one

Thank you very much for your effort I was able to open this one

How does uint64_t long long ULL work when using C and not C++? Wanting to understand how the hardware is created to enable the C code to work with hardware.

Yeah but I have i7 4770 and their performance is better than visual studio

Slower than others

I wanted to learn more about hardware development and software development work. I keep hearing about software modelling for hardware.

How does uint64_t long long ULL work when using C and not C++? Wanting to understand how the hardware is created to enable the C code to work with hardware.

How does uint64_t long long ULL work when using C and not C++? Wanting to understand how the hardware is created to enable the C code to work with hardware.

It's the responsibility of the compiler to make the C language compatible with the specified processor architecture. In a MSP430, for example, the int type is 16 bits wide, which is the width of the native word for this architecture. If you force an uint64_t the compiler will add extra logic to try to map the larger value into 4 registers or 4*2 memory positions (bytes aligned into 16 bits), leading to code bloat. In this architecture there is no native support for floating point, so floats and doubles require extra logic to fit the wider types and to implement the IEEE floating point logic. Depending on your program, the extra logic may bloat your executable in a couple kiB.

Appreciate your reply. So how does printf of ULL %llu work?

It's the responsibility of the compiler to make the C language compatible with the specified processor architecture. In a MSP430, for example, the int type is 16 bits wide, which is the width of the native word for this architecture. If you force an uint64_t the compiler will add extra logic to try to map the larger value into 4 registers or 4*2 memory positions (bytes aligned into 16 bits), leading to code bloat. In this architecture there is no native support for floating point, so floats and doubles require extra logic to fit the wider types and to implement the IEEE floating point logic. Depending on your program, the extra logic may bloat your executable in a couple kiB.

is uint64_t always present for C language? It seems to me for tiny architecture like 8 bit avr its missed.

No, these types are optional in C and C++. While compilers might be able to implement uint64_t on 8 bit processors, they cannot be implemented on system where the word size is a multiple of 9.

can`t we use 9*8register = 72 bits?

but I think its possible to use 72 to emulate 64. Also I am not aware of these exotic architectures with word size of 9

uint_least64_t is mandatory and might be implemented by using 72 bits. However looking at the fixed sized types, they are not allowed to contain padding and since 64 is not a multiple of 9 it cannot be done.

is uint64_t always present for C language? It seems to me for tiny architecture like 8 bit avr its missed.

uint_least64_t is mandatory and might be implemented by using 72 bits. However looking at the fixed sized types, they are not allowed to contain padding and since 64 is not a multiple of 9 it cannot be done.

According to C17, int_least_8_t, int_least_16_t, int_least_32_t, int_least_64_t, their unsigned and "fast" versions are required.

padding is about memory. if register is not memory mapped, why do we care?