Yep

Javascript op😂

Will it be any problem if I continue with C?

If you want to learn C++, stop finding excuses to compare it with C and just learn it. :)

Like less community support? Less problem solutions from online sites?

I think I want to learn that. I have decided i will go with it

In my opinion i think c Is better than Cpp cuz cpp has different coding styles

Again confused 😵

Again confused 😵

In my opinion i think c Is better than Cpp cuz cpp has different coding styles

different coding style doesn't make one better

Which high level language do u know?

Makes reading other open source code hard

Not any, I'm a 2nd year undergraduate studemt, don't have much exposer, i know python, javascript, somewhat c

Not any, I'm a 2nd year undergraduate studemt, don't have much exposer, i know python, javascript, somewhat c

documentation is important

Imagine working with someone with a different style

🤔 c follows functional whereas c++ follows both functional and object oriented right

Thanks again

A small advice, asking questions when you have fixed something on mind is not that good , i mean if you have decided and wont change it, then why ask :D

🤔 c follows functional whereas c++ follows both functional and object oriented right

I don't think so, both C and C++ don't have first class functions. Really essential for functional programming 🤔

A small advice, asking questions when you have fixed something on mind is not that good , i mean if you have decided and wont change it, then why ask :D

procedural and functional are different ?

procedural and functional are different ?

Yep, procedural is the top down approach as I know it. Like a list of instructions to do something you do the same when programming

C ++ follows bottom up approach right ?

Sorry but things I got to know here like which language have more libraries that are helpful in C++,in which have to write less code and many more things I got to know here. And thanks to all for that

Mostly yes, but it is kind of a multi paradigm language imo You can do OOP

ah yes, btw now i understood that i am not familiar with functional programming

Can you come up with an example of an object that is copyable but can't be movable? 🤔 I'm trying to imagine some realistic case and can't come up with one.

Any object that doesn't have move constructor.

Yes, but my question is can there be a situation where you can't provide move constructor because it will screw up the logic. When copy won't.

You may have an object that is identified by its address. Something like node in a list. If you move it - you break the list. Copy is fine though.

Can't you then just copy the logic from copy constructor to move constructor (not change the moved-from object)?

If you move your node it will have a different address. Node that was pointing to it will point to some invalid address.

Ah, you mean if I make a move constructor for a node then the container itself can become movable and it can create problems?

Yes, it will "break logic". I know it's a contrived example, but still...

I'm terribly sorry for silly question, but I haven't found C++ repository on github

I'm terribly sorry for silly question, but I haven't found C++ repository on github

https://www.codechef.com/problems/COFI4001

Can someone help me diferentiate,, call by value and call by reference in c programming

Yes

This is my method, and I can confirm this is where the problem is : template <class K, class V> void Map<K, V>::append(const K& k, const V& v) { cout << " Appending : " << k << " : " << v << endl; if(size == 0){ cout << "if" << endl; size++; A1 = new K[size]; A2 = new V[size]; A1[0] = k; A2[0] = v; } else { cout << "else" << endl; size++; A1[size-1] = k; A2[size-1] = v; } cout << A1[size-1]; cout << A2[size-1] << endl << endl; }

Printf("pliz do\n");

I will explain