Yeah

Then first you have to store it in a variable

But when I initiate the variable with default values then I don't need a variable bro why

Because when you are using default values you are passing a literal. You can also do this t1.setname("Dave") because Dave is a literal here but since you want input from a user you have to store that input somewhere in the memory so that you can use it later on.

so in my case what do I need to fix ?

Store the input in a variable and call the setname function with that godamm variable

And also I actually declared a variable named "name" inside the class

#include <iostream> using namespace std; class test1{ public: void setname(string x){ name = x; } string getname(){ return name; } private: string name; } int main(){ test1 t1; t1.setname("Mark"); //how do I get this input from user cout<<t1.getname(); return 0; }

Bro use this one: string input; cout << "User input: " ; getline(cin, input); //Then pass to your class method

Q3. Write a program for shopping mall, In shopping mall, there is a mobile shop, in this mobile shop you are getting offer if you will purchase mobile phone with power bank you will get 10% discount, but if you purchase any mobile or power bank you will get only 5 % discount. Display this offer to the user screen whenever user is selecting the option. Apply the concept of logical AND and OR operator overloading. Select option: 1. Only mobile 2. Only power bank 3. mobile with power bank 4. no any

/report request to solve the assignment

Please solve this

We are not here to solve your homework fool

We are not here to solve your homework fool

We are not here to solve your homework fool

We are not here to solve your homework fool

Can u send urs email I show u some magic

Let see who is fool😌

Lol bombing shit? Don’t oversmart

Can u send urs email I show u some magic

/ban debil

Thanks

What can be discussed in this group?

What can be discussed in this group?

To the question about new vs malloc / delete vs free. Is it better to use free instead of delete to the pointer I reallocated just before?

malloc is created on the stack (I think!) What I DO know is that new and delete are using the heap, which is actually safer

malloc is created on the stack (I think!) What I DO know is that new and delete are using the heap, which is actually safer

> malloc allocates memory on the heap, not stack. > Your local variables, env variables, program argv/argc are on the stack.

Can I make a dynamic memory allocation of a structure without pointer.

Can I make a dynamic memory allocation of a structure without pointer.

Size_t m = malloc(sizeof(struct name) * 9); I have NO IDEA if this is good or not.

int& p2 = *(new int);

Nononono wtf

What is wrong about it

Size_t m = malloc(sizeof(struct name) * 9); I have NO IDEA if this is good or not.

What is wrong about it

It would be better to use uintptr_t I think.

It would be better to use uintptr_t I think.

Nononono wtf

Oh i actually didn't know that you could cast back from uintptr_t to void *

Yeah we can. For example in 64 bit environment (where the pointer is 64 bit integer), we can also cast uint64_t to void * or other pointer types. However, uintptr_t is the way to guarantee that is always fit for pointer representation size.

I know nothing about memory management in C 😂

Size_t m = malloc(sizeof(struct name) * 9); I have NO IDEA if this is good or not.

You lier , before you answered more complex question 😂

It is good

Really? Which one?

no was wrong sorry

So why not realloc? It does the similar job, and even better, because it's, say, more low-level, than new and copying/moving data.

Because an object may have a state and, in general, is more than just the underlying memory.

what did you mean under "may have a state" ?