When everything is safe it's boring. Also small is still small and has some cool and some shit features.

LOL. being safer is boring. all hail my software bug overlords that shitstacked over the last 30 years thanks to C. Microsoft should never adopt rust in windows because it is safe and boring

LOL. being safer is boring. all hail my software bug overlords that shitstacked over the last 30 years thanks to C. Microsoft should never adopt rust in windows because it is safe and boring

This was more meant from a usage as hobby developer for hobby projects lol

For companies it's different

Still Rust has many problems

But the general idea is good

I Rust and C++. Rust for an VM and C++ for a engine.They are like brothers

This was more meant from a usage as hobby developer for hobby projects lol

https://github.com/cloudflare/boringtun yeah right and learn more kiddo

lol

also facebook libra, small right?

I've said the language is small

Especially the std library

Also with all the creates there is so much dependency bloat. A simple logging crate depends on 20+ others.

Often they are outdated or not required

Nothing will replace C/C++ Not even rust Because the c++ is larger than you can even imagine

Nothing will replace C/C++ Not even rust Because the c++ is larger than you can even imagine

Sure C++ will stay

It's just a hype which will be over in some years

Also with all the creates there is so much dependency bloat. A simple logging crate depends on 20+ others.

rust is based off of composition so no worries for a lot of bloat like in c++

rust being memory safe means it must have sacrificed some execution speed

rust is based off of composition so no worries for a lot of bloat like in c++

Doesn't matter. I had many problems with outdated crates. I do not care about the size of the final binary. I just like to overlook my 3rd party crates. And with rust it's a spam.

rust being memory safe means it must have sacrificed some execution speed

hmm true. atomicity, borrow checking and result matching are the three major problems right?

We need a crate for chrono, for bitmasks. Wow thanks Rust

hmm true. atomicity, borrow checking and result matching are the three major problems right?

Compare assembly of them. Rust is a bit slower sometimes and a bit faster sometimes

Compare assembly of them. Rust is a bit slower sometimes and a bit faster sometimes

i did

rust: haha safe system programming go reeeeeeee

might happen eventually, but rust doesn't even have a formal spec and is hence not suitable for safety critical software. Even if it had a spec, a rust compiler would need to be 'certified' as well.. which would probably take even longer.

It also has one compiler

We might see Rust overtake in 10 to 20 years and there will be still lot's of C++ code

We need a crate for chrono, for bitmasks. Wow thanks Rust

i guess its fine...they did it for zero cost

It also has one compiler

MIR backend is on the way *cranelift

i guess its fine...they did it for zero cost

No it's not. That should be a basic language feature. Try programm with Rust on a render server without networking xD

MIR backend is on the way *cranelift

Yeah that's cool

No it's not. That should be a basic language feature. Try programm with Rust on a render server without networking xD

can you transfer by UART/serial?

For game development C++ is still king by far because of the libraries like unreal engine 5

can you transfer by UART/serial?

No the connections are always full from the data pipeline. I had to copy the fucking crates to a USB

I'm not saying that. I use both. I like both. I think C++ is a better choice for most projects. I like C++ syntax and keywords more except from the integers. Rust has potential but some things are not tested enough or just annoying

No the connections are always full from the data pipeline. I had to copy the fucking crates to a USB

😂bake the execuable before it

😂bake the execuable before it

How should I compile for the server's architecture on a laptop it will never optimize it as it would be compiled on the server. It can easily detect all instruction sets and extensions, cache size etc and do the best?!

How should I compile for the server's architecture on a laptop it will never optimize it as it would be compiled on the server. It can easily detect all instruction sets and extensions, cache size etc and do the best?!

cross compiler, use xargo

I really like the integer keywords in Rust. u16, i8 and i64 names are much better than unsigned short etc...

cross compiler, use xargo

It was 4 years ago I think. There was no real option

The crate Spam is just not always great

For game development C++ is still king by far because of the libraries like unreal engine 5

calling ue5 a library? huh

And rust has no fancy template meta programming.C++ ist just a monster with tools for everything. And I love that variety. I also understand that n00bs and beginners don't like that because it's more to learn

calling ue5 a library? huh

Sorry meant engines. C++ has excellent libraries and engines

Most of the people should just stop crying about C++ and make little project's in it. Learning by doing is the key.

most of the fundamental software around us is written on C

Well C is very old, and geared toward kernels and drivers. I can see C being obsolete for a large spectrum of cases, but never fully obsolete because C is the base of any lowlevel stuff we know.

you know.. import OS;

Well you can include an OS Really https://github.com/includeos/IncludeOS

Bruh.

Since I only know ROP, who can tell me if OOP or ROP is better? When is either one better? Is either one faster?

(Learning C++, so I got curious.)

Since I only know ROP, who can tell me if OOP or ROP is better? When is either one better? Is either one faster?

Idk about ROP

Since I only know ROP, who can tell me if OOP or ROP is better? When is either one better? Is either one faster?

Both have their own pros & cons Return-oriented programming (ROP) is a computer security exploit technique that allows an attacker to execute code in the presence of security defenses such as executable space protection and code signing. Object-oriented programming(OOP) is a programming paradigm based on the concept of "objects", which can contain data and code: data in the form of fields, and code, in the form of procedures. A feature of objects is that an object's own procedures can access and often modify the data fields of itself. Java is pure OOP language and C++ have both the features Procedure oriented programming(POP) And Object Oriented Programming (OOP)

Since I only know ROP, who can tell me if OOP or ROP is better? When is either one better? Is either one faster?

Btw from where did you learn ROP ?

Hello

Which language is more widely used C++ or Java

java is in over 3.1 billion devices

What is the wrong pointer reference in the code ?? myfunc (const int** a) { . . } main () { . . int a[][] = {{ 1..2..}}; myfunc(a); }

What is the wrong pointer reference in the code ?? myfunc (const int** a) { . . } main () { . . int a[][] = {{ 1..2..}}; myfunc(a); }

you are declaring a double pointer, not an array of pointers. you need to use int* a[SIZE] or int a[][SIZE]

you are declaring a double pointer, not an array of pointers. you need to use int* a[SIZE] or int a[][SIZE]

If the size is unknown?

If i take input during runtime ?

java is in over 3.1 billion devices

which is recently removed

If the size is unknown?

pass a size variable to the function and use int* a[][size], but this won't work in C89

If i take input during runtime ?

I don't think you can do it, but maybe I'm wrong

maybe you can in later standards because you put const int instead of int, but I'm pretty sure you can't in C89

maybe you can in later standards because you put const int instead of int, but I'm pretty sure you can't in C89

Thank you I understood Is there any way i can pass the parameter if i don't want to pass the size in the function argument ?

In C99

I don't know about that unfortunately, I'm sorry

Could I send a link

Hi

Hi

Could I send a link

No

How can I started learning c++

I need full basic of C++

Can you give

Please

Yess.

Hi everyone... So I've need doing some research on data compression and I came across something called the Huffman tree and how it reduces the number of bits in a set off data... But I have two questions... Does the Huffman tree itself take up storage space since it's included on the file once it's compressed and if it does how much space would it take. Thank you in advance.

Btw from where did you learn ROP ?

Thanks. ROP is present in C, or not?

Thanks. ROP is present in C, or not?

Of course

The output of this code “i’m in scope” why?