h + cpp = hpp)))

h + cpp = hpp)))

H+CPP is hcpp

JS my native language xd

hpp is other format of h

hpp is other format of h

Independent, u can write whenever

haha

I can write it

But i not see have just project have .hpp

On my work .hpp is a files with inline implementation

popular like with .h

hpp is other format of h

Don't tell me it's supported in 2017 releases ??

Oh

*in waiting of module files in cpp20*

If u have not read about c++20 modules (object libraries) will have own file

Okayy, I will read about it

H+CPP is hcpp

I dont like this

This have the same logic

I am admin I am logic

Boost library is header only library)

Its not. Some parts of boost have source files

Moreover it have a some compiled parts

But majority of files is hpp with implementation

I am admin I am logic

Again kittie) you are sending every group .

Again kittie) you are sending every group .

Awww

Yes, because its heavy templated

https://www.learncpp.com/

OK

ok

I think C++20 is officially Out

Huh?

I think C++20 is officially Out

Why u think that?

Why u think that?

https://twitter.com/blelbach/status/1228633196083978241?s=19

Niccee but still I don't think the compilers support the full feature set yet

I think C++20 is officially Out

It still needs to be approved by the Draft International Standard (DIS), but due to the process and procedures of the people making the standard, it's very unlikely that the DIS will reject it

Niccee but still I don't think the compilers support the full feature set yet

Obviously, it's just came out. GCC has a lot of features already implementes, but there're still a lot to be done

In fact, I think clang and MSVC don't already have full C++17 support, so keep calm and wait for compiler implementors to add everything

https://twitter.com/supahvee1234/status/1228644152713318401?s=19

Check this convo xD

In fact, I think clang and MSVC don't already have full C++17 support, so keep calm and wait for compiler implementors to add everything

msvc has almost all C++17 features, and their lib is complete

In fact, I think clang and MSVC don't already have full C++17 support, so keep calm and wait for compiler implementors to add everything

I think MSVC has full C++ 17 and even some C++ 20: Modules, Coroutines and Concepts are working

Only consteval and constinit not and some std stuff is missing

Afaik their modules are ts variant, which is different from current standard

msvc has almost all C++17 features, and their lib is complete

Yeah, I've just looked it up on cppreference. It's gcc and clang still missing elementary string conversions and also clang missing the parallel stl

Yeah, I've just looked it up on cppreference. It's gcc and clang still missing elementary string conversions and also clang missing the parallel stl

Yeah MSVC has the most features in terms of standarts

Yeah MSVC has the most features in terms of standarts

Not really if you look the C++20 features. GCC is the absolute king in C++20

In fact, I think clang and MSVC don't already have full C++17 support, so keep calm and wait for compiler implementors to add everything

here you can see support of C++ features in different compilers https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support

here you can see support of C++ features in different compilers https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support

That's where I check all the info

Not really if you look the C++20 features. GCC is the absolute king in C++20

I see

Is it possible to use GCC on windows?

Is it possible to use GCC on windows?

MinGw

Okay - maybe I should switch from clang to gcc

MinGw

Or wsl

Okay - maybe I should switch from clang to gcc

Not really. Clang is awesome too, but it's just a little bit behind gcc

Not really. Clang is awesome too, but it's just a little bit behind gcc

Well - that shouldn't be a problem. I decided to compile my custom language to C or LLVM IR so C++ 20 doesn't really matter to me - but I like to play around with the new features

You can always use compiler explorer, which makes daily trunk builds of both gcc and clang

And maybe compile the trunk versions locally, but keep in mind that, specially llvm, take a long time to compile

And maybe compile the trunk versions locally, but keep in mind that, specially llvm, take a long time to compile

Yeah that's right

I already use gcc and clang trunk versions in a couple of personal projects, but to be honest, is not that rare to find unexpected bugs

:/

Loop array

Indeed

Which style would you prefer? (Brackets, Semicolon etc..)?

A: https://prnt.sc/r2g8nk

B: https://prnt.sc/r2g93h

C: https://prnt.sc/r2g9b7

What do you think is nicer/easier to read?

What lang is it?

My own - it is called GTEL and is a mixture of python, C# and C++

I will release it on github soon

A: https://prnt.sc/r2g8nk

This. I like idea of dictated indentation

Okay, thank you for your opinion :)

Definitely dont make semicolons mandatory

Definitely dont make semicolons mandatory

Semicolons are out dont worry :P

I want to create a clean and easy to use system programming language with an "advanced" mode to allow unsafe and special operations

But I´m not sure if no braces make it more readable:

https://prnt.sc/r2pq1t

Without braces it is shorter but it is really more readable I dont know :/

Pretty readable for me, but I have python experience

Ot is starting btw, im done