sorry i don't know

Hello i have need the of program that generd the fiscal code

Many thanks

Many thanks

👍

just use void* lmao

+

i am just wondering what is a bus error 10

It's just another strange name for segmentation fault, that is, error in you program caused by bad address or similar

so i need to change the variable name ?

Besides there is almost struct convention in all possible coding conventions not to name variables starting with upper case. Types can be anything, functions can be anything, but never ever name vars starting in upper case

so i need to change the variable name ?

This pice of code is very big so you must debug it and find some particular place where it happens

Welcome

This pice of code is very big so you must debug it and find some particular place where it happens

Yea the piece I sent was from a larger program I am building . I made the mistake of building it in it entirely first without debugging along the way , so I been break each piece in isolated document and testing ,so far I am close to the end now .

Also going to change up the naming convention so it’s easier to read

This pice of code is very big so you must debug it and find some particular place where it happens

The app itself doesn’t do anything to exciting but I just trying to test the skills I learn so far in this book I am about 8 chapters in on this 13 chapter book

The app itself doesn’t do anything to exciting but I just trying to test the skills I learn so far in this book I am about 8 chapters in on this 13 chapter book

😅

Please help me find the error in this program?

Please help me find the error in this program?

omg maybe iostream.h

omg maybe iostream.h

My friend then see the error that declaration syntax error

Please help me find the error in this program?

Try iosstream.h

tell what the compiler is

Try iosstream.h

I will try but facing declaration syntax error

Excuseme my very poor english please.

@VCSharp

/warn Read the rules

Lol

could he take screenshot or copy ? 😅

What if using an OS where you can't screebshit

Screenshot*

Like MSDos

There are still people writing games for old OS's lol

Like MSDos

Dunno, maybe if you want that old of a software you should buy an IBM laptop like an IBM 5100 and use the manual

What if using an OS where you can't screebshit

0) it’s an emulator 1) is screenshot software unavailable? lol

meh

these people nowadays

strange

There are still people writing games for old OS's lol

There is this thing named an emulator, because nowadays, computers being about 40 thousand time faster you could emulate every transistor of that old of a hardware and still run your software smoothly

yea

Please help me find the error in this program?

Is it Borland C++?

Please help me find the error in this program?

This is turboc You'll need to use iostream.h And no namespace Instead use gcc

Input =5 Output ABCDBCA BCDCB CDC D

Input =5 Output ABCDBCA BCDCB CDC D

/warn Read the rules, please, come on

/warn

Please help me find the error in this program?

Use iostream.h instead of iostream

Use iostream.h instead of iostream

He's disconnected, that DOS TCP stack, you know...

He's disconnected, that DOS TCP stack, you know...

Sry iam not see abt this

What's going on?

keep discussion on-topic

Ok

keep discussion on-topic

Oh you are admin of this group! But on my phone it is shown as Code warrior but on Pc as Admin. Don't know why.

Anyway I am not smart or show off guy. Just in case

Bye

Oh you are admin of this group! But on my phone it is shown as Code warrior but on Pc as Admin. Don't know why.

its custom admin tag, you have outdated telegram on desktop

No I am currently using the web version

I am on firefox 70.0.1

I am on firefox 70.0.1

that doesnt have to do with anything with it

just the web version doesnt support it

also its offtopic

If it hadn't for this bug I wouldn't have guessed that you are also admin

also its offtopic

I agree

Lol

I would like to propose something: to make a separate group for users of prestandardisation implementations of C++ so that turboC++ and Co are off-topic by default and to leave those people to their own predicaments

I would like to propose something: to make a separate group for users of prestandardisation implementations of C++ so that turboC++ and Co are off-topic by default and to leave those people to their own predicaments

and call it ‘Indians are welcomed’ :)

lol we can just send them to #ot

lol we can just send them to #ot

Well then to be formal about it you could add to the pinned message C89 and C++98 and upwards only

But I think that would be to be discussed by the admins in the admin chat

testing...

for(int i = 0; i < PrintableData.ArrayMemberTotal;i++){ free(PrintableData.DataType.stringArray[i]); } free(PrintableData.DataType.stringArray);

is this the proper way to free memory allocated for a array of strings

for(int i = 0; i < PrintableData.ArrayMemberTotal;i++){ free(PrintableData.DataType.stringArray[i]); } free(PrintableData.DataType.stringArray);

Yes this is it

Yes this is it

ok thanks

so you free each string first then the array itself afterwards

so you free each string first then the array itself afterwards

exactly!

exactly!

i have gotten my program to compile and it mostly work , but under certain conditions it gets a Segmentation fault: 11 error, so i assuming it has something to do with memory

google say you get this when you trying to access memory that you cant

i have gotten my program to compile and it mostly work , but under certain conditions it gets a Segmentation fault: 11 error, so i assuming it has something to do with memory

This cannot be called "mostly work", but "has bugs"

This cannot be called "mostly work", but "has bugs"

i am running it through valgrind now

so?

still it’s not working lol

i have gotten my program to compile and it mostly work , but under certain conditions it gets a Segmentation fault: 11 error, so i assuming it has something to do with memory

not necessary with (dynamic) memory,

=3500== Invalid read of size 1 ==3500== at 0x4DB61A0: __strcmp_avx2 (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.30.so) ==3500== by 0x401239: alphabetical_Order (functions.c:23) ==3500== by 0x4C96FA4: msort_with_tmp.part.0 (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.30.so) ==3500== by 0x4C96E01: msort_with_tmp.part.0 (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.30.so) ==3500== by 0x4C97345: qsort_r (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.30.so) ==3500== by 0x4017D5: print_Array (functions.c:335) ==3500== by 0x401667: AllocatedArrayMemory (functions.c:260) ==3500== by 0x4014E7: make_String_Array (functions.c:199) ==3500== by 0x4013AE: create_Array (functions.c:114) ==3500== by 0x4011AE: main (main.c:13) ==3500== Address 0x4e2598000000000 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd ==3500== ==3500== ==3500== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV): dumping core ==3500== General Protection Fault ==3500== at 0x4DB61A0: __strcmp_avx2 (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.30.so) ==3500== by 0x401239: alphabetical_Order (functions.c:23) ==3500== by 0x4C96FA4: msort_with_tmp.part.0 (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.30.so) ==3500== by 0x4C96E01: msort_with_tmp.part.0 (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.30.so) ==3500== by 0x4C97345: qsort_r (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.30.so) ==3500== by 0x4017D5: print_Array (functions.c:335) ==3500== by 0x401667: AllocatedArrayMemory (functions.c:260) ==3500== by 0x4014E7: make_String_Array (functions.c:199) ==3500== by 0x4013AE: create_Array (functions.c:114) ==3500== by 0x4011AE: main (main.c:13) ==3500== ==3500== HEAP SUMMARY: ==3500== in use at exit: 87 bytes in 4 blocks ==3500== total heap usage: 6 allocs, 2 frees, 2,135 bytes allocated ==3500== ==3500== LEAK SUMMARY: ==3500== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==3500== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==3500== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==3500== still reachable: 87 bytes in 4 blocks ==3500== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==3500== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown. ==3500== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all ==3500== ==3500== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s ==3500== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0) Segmentation fault (core dumped)