Can u share it DM
just search for LLVM clang lol
MilkBeforeCereal
14•08
So google for a quick install
I mean if you have it i only need setup for quick installation rather finding in Google .got me??
Anonymous
I mean if you have it i only need setup for quick installation rather finding in Google .got me??
No, dude
Googling is much faster than asking in a chat
Think about it
Anonymous
No, dude
Googling is much faster than asking in a chat
Think about it
I think that doesnt apply to all cases
MilkBeforeCereal
I think that doesnt apply to all cases
it is when you know what you exactly want, which he did
Anonymous
Ooh in that case i prefer to googling
Anonymous
https://pastebin.com/yaHWHDXX
why is the display not showing the results in currency?
Ilya
Is #include going to be deprecated in c++?!
And if not
Why?!
NO, it will not be deprecated ever.
Why -- because it is the core language mechanism used by everyone, everywhere and it will be used.
Ilya
doubt it, considering how much source code there is that currently relies on it
Don't doubt, it will not be removed.
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Ilya
max is ambigious
this little word "max" has too much semantics in both C and C++ so PLEASE if you don't want to have too much trouble DONT name your own objects like this,
use "Max" or "maxx" or "makz" or whatever you want, except "max".
I even will not be explaining you the whole complexity of the problem.
Ilya
The same reason why we are getting modules in C++20
Modules are not related to this, you (we) need pure C interoperability, then we need to include pure C headers , then we need preprocessor.
TrUstEd
I need a Jumia voucher,if you have one kindly inbox for negotiation
Anonymous
I need a Jumia voucher,if you have one kindly inbox for negotiation
/warn I don't have a Jumia voucher but instead I have a warn
Anonymous
???? What does it mean
数学の恋人
dude calmdown
数学の恋人
he just asked for a pdf, nothing sketchy
Anonymous
If you want i delete my message
Anonymous
I m sorry.i didn t know thath was a copyrighted content
klimi
klimi
Its on the info page
klimi
Alright
ញ៉ិប
Welcome
Anonymous
Okk
Pavel
See this
Yeah, I've read about this before. He's proposing a different thing, basically a system that is above modules and allows to use different C++ versions in different modules.
Using epochs will not change anything for includes. So deprecation/removing them would work the same way as if there's no epochs in the language: either all your code support it or none of it. So we're returning to the problem with dependencies.
Also modules are not here yet and insisting on completelly replacing includes with modules in the next three years would be radical, since we can't say for sure how many developers will find transferring to modules benifitial for them (there are opinions that modules aren't that good in this version). Even if we could replace them in C++23, there are chances that modules will slow down compilation times for big projects or cause some other problems that we can't see yet, because we need to try to use them in different cases first.
Artöm
Artöm
Artöm
%d reads keytab[1].count, which is 0
Ilya
Yeah, I've read about this before. He's proposing a different thing, basically a system that is above modules and allows to use different C++ versions in different modules.
Using epochs will not change anything for includes. So deprecation/removing them would work the same way as if there's no epochs in the language: either all your code support it or none of it. So we're returning to the problem with dependencies.
Also modules are not here yet and insisting on completelly replacing includes with modules in the next three years would be radical, since we can't say for sure how many developers will find transferring to modules benifitial for them (there are opinions that modules aren't that good in this version). Even if we could replace them in C++23, there are chances that modules will slow down compilation times for big projects or cause some other problems that we can't see yet, because we need to try to use them in different cases first.
Besides, I have very bad news to add:
Big OS players like Windows or Linux are not going to provide "modular" versions of their system libraries and includes.
This just means:
NOTHING WILL CHANGE,
MODULES USELESS
Ilya
I personally is not going to use C++ modules.
Ilya
I personally don't want to study this thing for nothing in return.
Anonymous
In which IDE was GIMP programmed? 🤔🤔
Pavel
In which IDE was GIMP programmed? 🤔🤔
It's completelly cross-platform so I believe different people from the development team can use different IDEs
Why do you ask?
Anonymous
Anonymous
Pavel
also maybe it's an old compiler version
or if it should be a C program, then AFAIK in-class initialization don't work for C
Mohammad
MilkBeforeCereal
probably just an editor
Anonymous
also maybe it's an old compiler version
or if it should be a C program, then AFAIK in-class initialization don't work for C
I think the second ideas might be the case.
Anonymous
Artöm
You cant
Artöm
Only C++11+
Anonymous
free express ban sender here
Dipak
Ok
Ilya
Anonymous
hey guys
Anonymous
do you recommend a good ide with an integrated compiler for C?
many
Yes and no. Sometimes it's not easy to simulate the production environment solely depends on a compiler
Sid Sun
klimi
𝔸𝕞𝕚𝕣
maybe
Anonymous