Anonymous
Good night again
Daniele°
https://github.com/vbextreme/vbar
Daniele°
Simple software, ~20kloc
Daniele°
Raii, Auto vectorization, function multiversioning, optional multithreading, etc, etc etc
Daniele°
yes, in C++ it would have been easier, because C++ Is more simple
Daniele°
you could get a heart attack by reading the macros in this file
https://github.com/vbextreme/vbar/blob/master/ef/image.c
joel
cool
Daniele°
joel
u could use a script for that tho
joel
joel
is that i3
Daniele°
Yes
Daniele°
i3 gaps
Daniele°
a bar configure in C script
joel
Daniele°
😂
Daniele°
cd vbar
meson build
ninja
sudo ninja install
vbar
Daniele°
~/.config/vbar/config.c
or
vbar -c /my/config.c
Daniele°
Ubuntu debian
./dependency.install apt
Fedora
./dependency.install dnf
Arch
./dependency.install pacman
Daniele°
Otherwise cat dependency.install 😂
joel
or just write an install script and send it to me
joel
I don't use Arch
Daniele°
blah
Daniele°
Is not valid distro for desktop
Daniele°
Is good for server
Daniele°
I don't want to use old software on my home PC
joel
Debian buster has new software
Daniele°
😂
joel
Debian testing
Daniele°
it is an excellent balance between stability and updates
Daniele°
Nassrullah
Hello every one ! I have been trying for many days to build my projects with cmake and make on Ubuntu... Really now i'm titred. Can anyone help me ? I'm using vscode.
Nassrullah
Note: I went on google but nothing
Nassrullah
I mean i found some articles on google but they didn't help me.
Nassrullah
If someone know a very good link where i can go...
Nassrullah
I have read this tutorial sometimes they talk about things i cannot find on vscode for Ubuntu
Nassrullah
https://medium.com/audelabs/c-development-using-visual-studio-code-cmake-and-lldb-d0f13d38c563
Nassrullah
Maybe because the author was using a Mac
Foxner
C++ Is very simple language
It's not simpler, but it is easier to use than plain C. I see nothing wrong with that.
Anonymous
depends on the user what is easier to use really :) was able to pick up c pretty fast and find it "easy" to coming from a java background. Really easier to use than c++ personally (since less vocabulary). But ive yet to do some bigger projects in C and/or C++ to tell if i still feel that way after that.
Ибраги́м
@Gauravghost the problem is you don't read rules
Mity
Sorry
Mity
I dont know the rules
Mity
😅
Ибраги́м
I dont know the rules
For posting long code snippets:
* [GitHub Gist](https://gist.github.com)
* [Ubuntu Paste](https://paste.ubuntu.com/)
* [Pastebin](https://pastebin.com)
Mity
Okay so tell me why I'm getting segmentation fault
Ибраги́м
I've deleted it
Mity
Ok
Ибраги́м
Ok
Post it here if it's very short or use:
* [GitHub Gist](https://gist.github.com)
* [Ubuntu Paste](https://paste.ubuntu.com/)
* [Pastebin](https://pastebin.com)
Ибраги́м
Okay so tell me why I'm getting segmentation fault
* You are not entitled to an answer, getting angry about not answered questions will get you warned.
* Not checking your problem in google (or any other search engine) first will get you a warn.
Ибраги́м
http://250bpm.com/blog:8
Point 1 [allegedly against C++]:
Verdict: Foolish, Ignorant and Appalling
With C, the raising of the error and handling it are tightly couped and reside at the same place in the source code. This makes it easy to understand what happens if error happens:
int rc = fx ();
if (rc != 0)
handle_error ();
With C++ you just throw the error. What happens then is not at all obvious:
int rc = fx ();
if (rc != 0)
throw std::exception ();
Correction: Both codes are Valid C++, the author is drunk on an expired drink (I think).
Ибраги́м
So it is 2 warns = ban
Just don't use those words and misuse the commands.
You make better arguements when not overtly offensive.
Ибраги́м
Thanks, I'll read that
But I'm sure that will not change my mind
No need to read it.
TLDR; The Author regrets he used exceptions wrongly or shouldn't have used it
Ludovic 'Archivist'
Point 1 [allegedly against C++]:
Verdict: Foolish, Ignorant and Appalling
With C, the raising of the error and handling it are tightly couped and reside at the same place in the source code. This makes it easy to understand what happens if error happens:
int rc = fx ();
if (rc != 0)
handle_error ();
With C++ you just throw the error. What happens then is not at all obvious:
int rc = fx ();
if (rc != 0)
throw std::exception ();
Correction: Both codes are Valid C++, the author is drunk on an expired drink (I think).
You could even return an std::variant that would contain the exception so that you can handle it without throwing
Ибраги́м
You could even return an std::variant that would contain the exception so that you can handle it without throwing
Thank you.
The author's getting bamboozled left right center
Ludovic 'Archivist'
Thank you.
The author's getting bamboozled left right center
And the reader not doing any better when they did not actually ever practice C++, I saw that