But memory-unpredictable

I think at least the same predictable as with C arrays

read about how it works and then call \n “shit"

I still didn't understand why do we need to flush the buffer.

So .. int[2][3][4] would be int(*+2)(*+3)(*+4) ?

But memory-unpredictable

the problem with std::vector is that the compiler will generate a full set of functions for each template

So .. int[2][3][4] would be int(*+2)(*+3)(*+4) ?

Or however pointer-arithmetic is done. 😅

+ classes are bloat

+ classes are bloat

memory unpredictability is the least of your problems

the problem with std::vector is that the compiler will generate a full set of functions for each template

Memory is cheap, at least if you not working with some embedded stuff

I mean these things are minor

Memory is cheap, at least if you not working with some embedded stuff

People thinking like you are the reason we need this much RAM to begin with

I mean these things are minor

THEY ARE NOT

So .. int[2][3][4] would be int(*+2)(*+3)(*+4) ?

*(*(*(int+2)+3)+4) iirc

So .. int[2][3][4] would be int(*+2)(*+3)(*+4) ?

int [2][3][4] is invalid

either you do int b[2][3][4] ; or you do int[] <=> int*

int [2][3][4] is invalid

It's a example

if you meant b[2][3][4], then it would be what mihail said

He said int[2][3][4] not int [2][3][4]

Which shows that it is just an example name

True

was kinda ambiguous

But ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

THEY ARE NOT

Well, I would like to see the list of your priorities regarding software, if unused functions generated by templates are so important

Well, I would like to see the list of your priorities regarding software, if unused functions generated by templates are so important

Come on

No offence by the way, I really would like to

No offence by the way, I really would like to

1) get it to run 2) get it to run fast in the least amount of space possible 3) get the code clean

something like that

Well, in my case 2 and 3 would be swapped

1) get it to run 2) get it to run fast in the least amount of space possible 3) get the code clean

Give up at 1 :P

Well, in my case 2 and 3 would be swapped

But why?

Yeah sure teachers are very dumb

No

Most of the time, clean code is super slow to write

No

Some are

The purpose of group is helping so that's not a favor

Oh shit

Most of the time, clean code is super slow to write

And it usually wont end up cleaner than what you'd do normally

Most of the time, clean code is super slow to write

Not an excuse to write bad code

Some are

Ye but ....they are not teachers.... Because they can't teach anything

https://github.com/Wittmaxi/JASM

Just start off with 3 and do it cleanly the whole way

this compiler I wrote in 2-3 is an example of how efficient code can be done cleanly while being functional

this compiler I wrote in 2-3 is an example of how efficient code can be done cleanly while being functional

I like

Just start off with 3 and do it cleanly the whole way

This is how Slack came to become the RAM beast we know and love!

This is how Slack came to become the RAM beast we know and love!

#noobdevs

#noobdevs

Thats what I see when I look into the standard library of C++

It litterally just fixes fuckups C devs commonly make 😂

previous std devs made*

Thats what I see when I look into the standard library of C++

"the standard library of C++" The standard library?

don’t blame c/c devs

lol the C community is full of dumbasses 😂

lol the C community is full of dumbasses 😂

s/c/js

"the standard library of C++" The standard library?

which other library?

This is how Slack came to become the RAM beast we know and love!

Its because users don't care. I mean if you can write can slow code fast it's usually more appreciated now than just write fast code.

which other library?

? There is no one standard library

Its because users don't care. I mean if you can write can slow code fast it's usually more appreciated now than just write fast code.

I can write fast code quickly

Also, the entire "slack abuses ram" memes show that users DO care

But they use it anyway, if they refuse and go to some lighter alternatives, it would change something

I can write fast code quickly

And break it even quicker

Sure

And break it even quicker

Lol?

Lol?

No?

I mean I can brag a lot about the smartphones getting worser, but if I buy the new ones, I actually do support them. Well, not a good analogy.. but I think you get it

I mean I can brag a lot about the smartphones getting worser, but if I buy the new ones, I actually do support them. Well, not a good analogy.. but I think you get it

smartphones arent getting worse

but the apps on them are bad

so the smartphones are forced to upgrade their hardware

May I remind you C++ guys that you block the CPU in order to copy memory from spot one to spot two, while another process could use the CPU in the meanwhile?

Most of the time, clean code is super slow to write

Faster to maintain, faster to test, faster to push into prduction

People however are not used t write it

Don’t talk to this guy, he doesn’t know what is a production stage 😂

Faster to maintain, faster to test, faster to push into prduction

Maybe we should get our definitions straight:

I call modern clean code that fancy modern stuff with classes, and design patterns and templates etc

Sure, having small functions with good names and good variables is INDEED very important

+ classes are bloat

no, a class is not bloat

no, a class is not bloat

Except for when the compiler fucks up at optimizing it or can't optimize it because you cannot just create half of the class

Except for when the compiler fucks up at optimizing it or can't optimize it because you cannot just create half of the class

please provide an example where a class adds bloat

No

believe what you want ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

thought so... Torvalds strikes again "Talk is cheap. Show me the code."

Though torvalds agrees with me that C++ is shit 😉

I call modern clean code that fancy modern stuff with classes, and design patterns and templates etc

That's not the definition of modern nor clean code imo. Modern and clean code is the one using the last technologies, it's only the needed code, and it's totally covered by useful and well written tests. The use of the right pattern in the right place and context is more useful than anything else in creating code easily readable, maintainable and sharable while contributing to improve a wide accepted way of doing stuff

Though torvalds agrees with me that C++ is shit 😉

Torvalds agrees about C++ being useless for a kernel