never heard of multi character constants

because they're not portable and you probably shouldn't use them

because they're not portable and you probably shouldn't use them

yea

in bit manip stuff they might come in handy

rvalue = right value = asignee lvalue = left value = assigned to

std::move(std::string{}) = "hello"; ?

?

an rvalue can be on the left side as well

yes

But i wanted to give a bigger picture for beginners

But that's wrong

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

its better than no explanation

also, its useless nomenclature

no, I'd rather have none than a wrong one

false positives are worst

OKay, then explain

An rvalue is either an xvalue or an prvalue

what are those?

A prvalue is an expression whose evaluation initializes an object or a bit-field, or computes the value of an operand of an operator, as specified by the context in which it appears, or an expression that has type cv void. An xvalue is a glvalue that denotes an object or bit-field whose resources can be reused (usually because it is near the end of its lifetime).

http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.lval

#include <iostream> using namespace std; int main() { char ch; while(scanf("%c",&ch)!=EOF) { if(ch == '->') { '->'='.' ; else continue; } } return 0; }

Does ollis explanation of an rvalue help you?

THe thing is that quoting the standard is the best way to confuse beginners

Does ollis explanation of an rvalue help you?

Imo "rvalue" doesn't help him at well.

The worst thing for beginners is teaching them wrong things

but that's #ot anyway

The worst thing for beginners is teaching them wrong things

How was my explanation fully wrong?

Anyway, even if I got this fully wrong, this is just stupid nomenclature that won't help anybody

well except if you write a compiler and need to read the standard

good luck to those poor suckers

Given that it was a kernel that does nothing, its also kinda useless

Kernel programming is in c right which is procedure oriented

Kernel programming is in c right which is procedure oriented

You can do kernel programming in any language

the one I used was C++

You can do kernel programming in any language

My bad😊👍

However, i'd definitely advise against using C++ for kernels

My bad😊👍

Dont worry 😉

Anyway, even if I got this fully wrong, this is just stupid nomenclature that won't help anybody

In the end, you just use rvalue and lvalue. The other ones are quite confusing

Dont even use them

Just say "a character constant"

the terms rvalue and lvalue dont mean a lot

some people told me about degug mode instead of release

The whole thing is to know what "move semantics" is all about

some people told me about degug mode instead of release

that would probably decrease security instead of increasing it to ease debugging

that would probably decrease security instead of increasing it to ease debugging

I know it , but I am creating exploitsme , but I need a way to fix in release mode

good luck to those poor suckers

If you want a rule of thumb I'd rather go with: "It if has a name, it's an lvalue" That's even easier and more correct

If you want a rule of thumb I'd rather go with: "It if has a name, it's an lvalue" That's even easier and more correct

Okay

I can agree with that =D

that would probably decrease security instead of increasing it to ease debugging

how can I move the binary ? no debug symbols and keepig __security_init_check as before

If you want a rule of thumb I'd rather go with: "It if has a name, it's an lvalue" That's even easier and more correct

In fact, that's a pretty resonable explanation. I saw an example where the name just changed the whole context

how can I move the binary ? no debug symbols and keepig __security_init_check as before

well just move it? that won't change anything with the binary itself

not sure i understand you exactly

Example i have a binary compiled with /GS , and of course we should have __security_init_cookie at the top right?

it should unless one of your other options disables it

not sure about what /DYNAMICBASE:NO /NXCOMPAT:NO do

have you tried to see if they're the cause for __security_init_cookie not being present?

00401573 > $ E8 A3020000 CALL stack_co.__security_init_cookie 00401578 .^E9 74FEFFFF JMP stack_co.__scrt_common_main_seh 0040157D >/$ 55 PUSH EBP 0040157E |. 8BEC MOV EBP,ESP 00401580 |. 8B45 08 MOV EAX,DWORD PTR SS:[EBP+8] 00401583 |. 56 PUSH ESI 00401584 |. 8B48 3C MOV ECX,DWORD PTR DS:[EAX+3C] 00401587 |. 03C8 ADD ECX,EAX 00401589 |. 0FB741 14 MOVZX EAX,WORD PTR DS:[ECX+14] 0040158D |. 8D51 18 LEA EDX,DWORD PTR DS:[ECX+18] 00401590 |. 03D0 ADD EDX,EAX 00401592 |. 0FB741 06 MOVZX EAX,WORD PTR DS:[ECX+6] 00401596 |. 6BF0 28 IMUL ESI,EAX,28 00401599 |. 03F2 ADD ESI,EDX 0040159B |. 3BD6 CMP EDX,ESI 0040159D |. 74 19 JE SHORT stack_co.004015B8

But honestly, where the fuck would you need design patterns?

Noob. would ban ya right now.

LOL im litterally the only one who contributes anything useful

unless you count all those "google it yourself" messages useful

unless you count all those "google it yourself" messages useful

I helped too :(

Mhh okay,

I didnt see it though

so I cant tell

lol

Hello mates, I'm just enter to this channel, hope everyone is freaking well. Kind Regards.

Oy!

I'm doing well

what about you?

I'm having a blast, I am a Computer Scientist in this awesome Digital Era.

Nice

I dont know why , but I just fix it delete folder then compile again and it works

is it possible remove or customize bad chars?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78Y_LRZPVRg

K

hi, I’ve a question: with only a “break” can I close two (or more) “while”? I hope you’ve understood

yeah as loong as your dont get infinite

how?

while(_TRUE_) thing... while(__True__) thing break

but if I do this, only the second while get closed

hi, I’ve a question: with only a “break” can I close two (or more) “while”? I hope you’ve understood

No