Exactly, just saw your source

Hehehe :D

just dont look at the file where I do the template unpacking

@Drazzy has designed a laptop - but its not available anymore

Designed?

webcpp is actually super easy to pickup and maintain

lol gotta warn you for advertisement everytime

Designed?

yea

lol gotta warn you for advertisement everytime

I don't see why?

@Drazzy, never knew you design laptops

just dont look at the file where I do the template unpacking

https://github.com/Wittmaxi/webcpp/blob/master/src/header/base_traits.hpp

this is the messy file

Sure

Happy birthday Koyomi!

Is it appropriate to pack data into consecutive bytes e.g. packing 8 ASCII char to 7 bytes?

why would you do that?

Is it appropriate to pack data into consecutive bytes e.g. packing 8 ASCII char to 7 bytes?

Yes. why not? If I am not mistaken the UPER encoding for ASN.1 might do something similar by default.

why would you do that?

To save bandwidth

Happy birthday Koyomi!

Thank you so much !!

To save bandwidth

and waste computing power in a world with lots of bandwidth

and waste computing power in a world with lots of bandwidth

That depends. IO is always slower. Especially in constrained environments

and waste computing power in a world with lots of bandwidth

You can actually save up to 12.5% of the bandwidth. That's quite a lot.

Hye

Hi = "Hi" Bye = "Bye" Hye = ("Hi", "Bye")

Wew

Programming c

Koyomi

Koyomi

1

.

Will do

HBd koyomi

Will do

TL;DR std::endl is identical to a '\n' + std::flush (which is very slow), so like in the loop you shared in the OT group you should be using '\n' instead and then maybe flushing after it if necessary

Right now I can't, will watch it on PC tomorrow

Well basically what I said above

TL;DR std::endl is identical to a '\n' + std::flush (which is very slow), so like in the loop you shared in the OT group you should be using '\n' instead and then maybe flushing after it if necessary

Sure, I got your point.

std::cout << "Hello, World\n";

Ah , my phone

Yeah it'll probably be flush even without explicitly having a std::flush

It's hard to type when you're used to touch type on pc

Yeah it'll probably be flush even without explicitly having a std::flush

I've thought an escape sequence '\n' won't flush

Now you cleared it up

But having std::endl basically forces it to do so every single time

HBd koyomi

TY Meda

But having std::endl basically forces it to do so every single time

And that's bad.

Usually I code in C, and TBH I suck really bad at C++, didn't pay attention to every detail yet.

Yeah well idk about bad, but it use is very slow

It's bad because it's slow

It's bad because it's slow

You stole my words.

Yeah it'll probably be flush even without explicitly having a std::flush

it will be flushed either when the buffer is not big enough or on destruction

on a wt-nwa cache, every write that's made will be a miss, right?

You cannot cache writes

So it wont even try

@Drazzy

am I right?

Happy birthday Day koyomi

Why we study switch cases in programming with c?

Happy birthday Day koyomi

Thank you Rekha

Thank you Rekha

Happy birthday

Koyomi

Welcome😊😊

Koyomi

Thank you Yogesh

Why we study switch cases in programming with c?

Coz... When more than 3 or 4 conditions are to be tested it gets complicated with other control statements.... At that tym switch is proffered & even it consumes some what less time... Coz jump tables are created in switche cases so it checks faster... While in case of other control statements it checks one-by-one every cases.... Hope uh understood.. My point 😄

Thank you

Hi rose

I have following declarations double sum(const vector<double>&); vector<double> v {1.2, 8.5, 6.626, 3.14159}; const double s1 = sum(v); constexpr double s2 = sum(v); which one of the above is wrong, as for me, I think 4th one wrong. Please correct me if I'm wrong

Isn't constexpr a function expression?

constexpr int square(int x) { return x * x; }

And it tells the compiler to evaluate it at compile time

constexpr int square(int x) { return x * x; }

u also can use noexcept

Right

Isn't constexpr a function expression?

it's constexpr function, coz compiler knows a value of funcs param

it's constexpr function, coz compiler knows a value of funcs param

Yeah

Yeah

if it's not, it will be just an usual function what will return a value in execution time

Of course ;

Thank u

😊

Any one know about android lang.

Any one know about android lang.

What do you mean?

Any one know about android lang.

#googleit and then return with improved knowledge

what are the results of c |= 1 and c |=2 in decimal?

decimal ?

if c is 0, it will be 1 and 2 lol

yes zero