lol

Or if you don't have an understanding yourself

Sure

okay, sure, i'm sorry, oop is a small part of C++

the std:: lib is not official to C++, right?

because else, it wouldnt use a class on every second occasion

because else, it wouldnt use a class on every second occasion

That's true for the interfaces of the library

Which is like the tip of the iceberg

Anyways not looking to argue over someone's ignorance

have you implemented std:: before?

how much of what you implemented actually was outside of a class?

also - again: if there are three paradygms and OOP is 1/3, wtf do you call big then?

or even wtf do you call not small?

or even wtf do you call not small?

Half

Over 2/3 is big

Anyways ot

Anyways not looking to argue over someone's ignorance

And this

you have weird definitions

you have weird definitions

Seems to me like you're the one with the weird definitions

Seems to me like you're the one with the weird definitions

1/3 is still big

1/3 is still big

No?

functional is a crap

That is likely why the newer standards add more and more of it

Likely that no-one likes type safety, monads and coroutines

This is why we added lots of these and are still doing so

Same goes for std algorithms, we made that because we hate to reuse code for different contexts

guys i need Rust language group in telegram ,does anyone have ?

guys i need Rust language group in telegram ,does anyone have ?

you're at wrong place

guys i need Rust language group in telegram ,does anyone have ?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Rust+programming+telegram

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Rust+programming+telegram

😁👌 Thanks mate

😁👌 Thanks mate

I feel that you don't understand the whole magnificence of my disappointment

I feel that you don't understand the whole magnificence of my disappointment

destruction 100

I feel that you don't understand the whole magnificence of my disappointment

i didn't know can found with search in search engine

thanks anyway

i didn't know can found with search in search engine

Saying that means that you also haven't read the pinned message about how to ask questions

Saying that means that you also haven't read the pinned message about how to ask questions

Ok

Can someone help me with my code? I cant figure out how to do it.

Can someone help me with my code? I cant figure out how to do it.

#meta

How can I run the if(RoomsBooked >= 10)

When I type yes, the program will just exit.

well RoomsBooked is 4

why should it enter the if?

why should it enter the if?

If the ApplyDiscount is equal to yes, it should do the under if statement. But if the applydiscount is equ to no, then there will be discount be applied.

after the "Applydiscount == yes" you have only one if, and its branch executes only if roomsbooked is >= 10

but roomsbooked is equal to 4

there is no code that should execute

If the ApplyDiscount is equal to yes, it should do the under if statement. But if the applydiscount is equ to no, then there will be discount be applied.

it checks the if statement, but the condition is false

Oh yeah, didnt see that clearly. Thanks bro

Hi! What is the right boolean variable naming? isButtonEnabled or buttonIsEnabled? I think if (isButtonEnabled) looks more readability

choose one

but once you have chosen one, keep all the names the same

the pattern doesnt matter too much

unless you keep switching patterns

Snake case is_button_enabled

isButtonEnabled makes more sense to me

Or Camel case IsButtonEnabled

since it sounds like a question

Use anyone that suits but stick to one the whole time

isButtonEnabled makes more sense to me

weirdly enough, buttonIsEnabled makes more sense to me. This shows, that talk about such matters is just "bikeshedding". Just choose one, and ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I've seen some use is_Button_Enabled; weirdos

snake case is weird already, IMHO

but snake case with pascal case or camel case is horrible

kill that guy please

kill that guy please

😂

- functional - oop - procedural

depending on what you consider a paradigm C++ has way more, e.g. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_multi-paradigm_programming_languages So the OO part becomes even smaller :)

depending on what you consider a paradigm C++ has way more, e.g. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_multi-paradigm_programming_languages So the OO part becomes even smaller :)

Mhh okay, didn't think of those many other paradigms

Wow it's a long going debate

Guys, which is correct?

Adding the discounts and multiplying it to the totalcost?

Or total cost *discount1 * discount 2?

we don't know what you want to do

Adding the discounts and multiplying it to the totalcost?

Ask an accountant

Why switch statement doesn't use float?

Why switch statement doesn't use float?

because think of it, what’s the profit. and it’s bad to compare floats that way

Why switch statement doesn't use float?

switch doesnt work like you think it does

Mostly because the floating point numbers are slightly imprecise and take more time on operations than int type variables/numbers. ... This is why float comparison is not recommended even with if-else conditions. As switch is also another form of if-else, it's not allowed to avoid further bugs.

Why switch statement doesn't use float?

How can you assign case values in float?

Switch isn't as same as if else, it just compares the condition given with every case

Thank you guys