Now, why don't we make him tell us what "file get string" means ?

get a sequences of byte

from which source?

well done!

Savage. 😆

What if user don't want to read data from a file just want to copy the data ecrypt it and then paste the encrypted text back.. You know users can be dumb. 😆

Copy data from?

anyway, fgets is rejected

there is no problem, continue using fgets, mr vbextreme!

It's portable

no portable as in "lightweight" 😉

what was the #ot or so

he is

and you are not.

Hi, I have a question. I'm more or less a beginner in C++. I'm currently writing a C++ program and I've encountered a problem. My initial idea was to write a function that takes a null pointer as an argument and gives it an address (it's an initialization function). I hoped that I would then be able to use that pointer outside of the function, without having to return the pointer. Unfortunately that doesn't seem to be the case. Now I'm wondering, why didn't my method work? Are pointers immutable? Or does setting its address inside a function somehow not reflect outside of the function? What can I do to achieve my goal?

Hi, I have a question. I'm more or less a beginner in C++. I'm currently writing a C++ program and I've encountered a problem. My initial idea was to write a function that takes a null pointer as an argument and gives it an address (it's an initialization function). I hoped that I would then be able to use that pointer outside of the function, without having to return the pointer. Unfortunately that doesn't seem to be the case. Now I'm wondering, why didn't my method work? Are pointers immutable? Or does setting its address inside a function somehow not reflect outside of the function? What can I do to achieve my goal?

First time I know that my brain is strongly typed >Function that takes a null pointer First thing I had in my mind is std::nullptr_t

Hi, I have a question. I'm more or less a beginner in C++. I'm currently writing a C++ program and I've encountered a problem. My initial idea was to write a function that takes a null pointer as an argument and gives it an address (it's an initialization function). I hoped that I would then be able to use that pointer outside of the function, without having to return the pointer. Unfortunately that doesn't seem to be the case. Now I'm wondering, why didn't my method work? Are pointers immutable? Or does setting its address inside a function somehow not reflect outside of the function? What can I do to achieve my goal?

Maybe you didn't pass that pointer by reference!!!

Maybe you didn't pass that pointer by reference!!!

This! Thank you, that solved it.

welcome! yes

wait no its an infinite loop

Please all focus here how to remove such error

What is the point of teaching Turbo C++ in the uni?!

I mean There is no a single way I would use this thing

TurboCpp is not too bad

iirc you can change the colors

It's the BAD definition

It's just bad