BinaryByter
const doesnt mean anything after compilation
BinaryByter
Its just that the compiler won't allow any writes to the int
BinaryByter
this answer doesnt help him and is completely Off what he wanted to know
Anonymous
warn him!
Anonymous
/ot yes it is really unrelevant
BinaryByter
its not off topic though as it is related to C++
BinaryByter
@ollirz is this OT or not?
Roxifλsz 🇱🇹
Roxifλsz 🇱🇹
Ah shut the fuck up
Constantly calling things ot, how fucking annoying that is
BinaryByter
How is what @florianbAT says OT though?
BinaryByter
Sure he sometimes adds a few gags
BinaryByter
Mhh oh well
Anonymous
<on-topic> real machine... but you do realize that power's also playing a role? </on-topic>
BinaryByter
there are so many things that play a role
BinaryByter
:D
BinaryByter
I didn't say that I don't want your answers but that particular answer was completely against what was asked
Anonymous
there are so many things that play a role
PROCEDURE ON-TOPIC yeah, so it's just not going to happen lolz END PROCEDURE
BinaryByter
BinaryByter
I didn't say that I don't want your answers but that particular answer was completely against what was asked
tbh you should really step down of your high horse of "I know every word that the standard uses"
BinaryByter
because 1) using those fancy words won't help a beginner 2) quoting the standard is not helpful either 3) you often confuse yourself in your claims when using those fancy words
Anonymous
@Drazzy look, he's evolving! teaching himself already!
BinaryByter
I KNOW RIGHT?
BinaryByter
😂
Dima
I KNOW RIGHT?
NO YOU DON'T
BinaryByter
Mhh
BinaryByter
the question was badly asked to begin with, thats right
BinaryByter
🤔
BinaryByter
i didn't see that face of the medal
Mihail
You're just making excuses now
BinaryByter
@florianbAT interpreted the question like I did
Mihail
@florianbAT interpreted the question like I did
I don't see an answer by him
BinaryByter
he agreed with my answers and with my statement of vlwehlin being wrong
BinaryByter
anyway
BinaryByter
#ot
Mihail
Mihail
Can't do anything about that
BinaryByter
You're just making excuses now
Anonymous
Its just that the compiler won't allow any writes to the int
what I want to know is how does the compiler compile this into instructions. as far as I know, literal integers are usually compiled to immediate values in the instructions. so it's not possible to get its address since the reference usually has a internal pointer to implement it.
BinaryByter
@mmihov btw, I was right about this question 😉
BinaryByter
no, integers aren't compiled into immediate values
only if you do this: functioncall (1);
Mihail
Mihail
You said something completely unrelated
Mihail
What does const only being a compiler-safety have to do with any of this?
BinaryByter
only if you do this: functioncall (1);
normally, an int is compiled to some space in the binary (global variable) or on the stack (local variables)
BinaryByter
so you want an answer - even if it is off topic?
Mihail
so you want an answer - even if it is off topic?
That's not even off-topic lol
BinaryByter
well the answer is the answer I gave
Mihail
well the answer is the answer I gave
However a completely unrelated one, yes
BinaryByter
Okay, sure i'm wrong
BinaryByter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
BinaryByter
Sure ☺️
BinaryByter
Don't hesitate to ask again 😉
Anonymous
😀👌
Anonymous
not everything I say is a joke, but it's a joke whatever I say... but since I interpreted the question exactly as Maximilian did, it can't be wrong because everyone knows I'm never wrong..
Ludovic 'Archivist'
i said "real machine"
It is what you do on real machine, but you rarely NEED real constant time
Ludovic 'Archivist'
Anonymous
except it doesn't exist physically in that sense
Ludovic 'Archivist'
except it doesn't exist physically in that sense
What do you mean it doesn't exists?
Ludovic 'Archivist'
It is constant time with a resolution of more or less half a nanosecond
Ludovic 'Archivist'
Tho I admit it is a nightmare to write such code
Ludovic 'Archivist'
And it requires lots of system configuration
Anonymous
Hi
Anonymous
hey admin.. can you please stop Rose from delievering the welcome message everytime a new user joins?
Anonymous
its kinda annoying
Dima
no
Dima
then mute this chat.
Mat
It has the Click here to prove you're human thing
Ludovic 'Archivist'
It has the Click here to prove you're human thing
Would be good if that depopped the message when they do tho