"hey, they emit mov eax, <char> .. I should do that too"

Sir, how to start cernal dov on kali loncox

Are you one of the guys spamming me in PM to do your homework!?

Are you one of the guys spamming me in PM to do your homework!?

those are very frequent when being in this group

lol I figured 😂

Sir, how to start cernal dov on kali loncox

and I thought that marrying you would be a good idea

😢

Ludovic is right though on the first C++'s

Ludovic is right though on the first C++'s

they are ... C in disguise

C++ was once incepted to add OO to C but did walk its own path after that

luckily 😂

Still many don't even know that and talk all kinds of bullshit

Still many don't even know that and talk all kinds of bullshit

right, mr vbextreme?

and I thought that marrying you would be a good idea

XD

😂

We have people talking about OO in C; its a bunch of glue instead, surely it might do something like-ish, but its far from it

just make sure you're ok with your wifi being down every few seconds with me screwing with it

We have people talking about OO in C; its a bunch of glue instead, surely it might do something like-ish, but its far from it

its very glue-ish

its really just to show off

But hey mr vbextreme says more crap, right? He's doing a 10 byte bootsector on atmel in C but can't boot an X86 from a legacy bios in it

But he's sure he could do better in C 😂

But hey mr vbextreme says more crap, right? He's doing a 10 byte bootsector on atmel in C but can't boot an X86 from a legacy bios in it

he's doing the bootsector in C?

Thats what he was asking last time I asked you to re-phrase your question

holy moly... gotta fit a full libc in those 10 bytes

😂

Wait what, I was asking

wait, libc isnt there in the freestanding

He doesn't understand even that

Besides, he thinks Siemens knows best

just make sure you're ok with your wifi being down every few seconds with me screwing with it

i'll get you a separate router

Besides, he thinks Siemens knows best

SC++, my new favourite c-cc

Building a way too expensive platform around dirt cheap chips because people are stupid enough to buy 😂

But lets not be it about him

Building a way too expensive platform around dirt cheap chips because people are stupid enough to buy 😂

😂

Most don't know what they're working with

Ludovic at least shows insight

Please Mention Secrets PMS

PMS -> Gerneral state of being to many females

yes :D

unfortunately 😢

holy moly... gotta fit a full libc in those 10 bytes

libc is optional

libc is optional

not if you compile for linux

not if you compile for linux

Is Always optional

Is Always optional

okay, then show me that C can do a full hello world in less than 50 bytes

that runs on linux

(Which ASM variant would you like?)

I'll take... umm

okay, then show me that C can do a full hello world in less than 50 bytes

😂

I'll take... umm

thats a hard pick

so many nice flavours

maybe Phillip's assembler dialect, since its a bit less known. Also, I know the guy who implemented the compiler personally

bios, ah,0eh or 13h; kernel using int 80h or int 21h in dos/windows/os2, direct memory writes.. the list goes on

😂

not "😂". show me

I think it's a good practice to learn the language just by watching you guys spit some C++ bullets here

I think it's a good practice to learn the language just by watching you guys spit some C++ bullets here

😂

thanks :D

Thank YOU

not "😂". show me

You Need only call systemcall write

in C++?

show me the program code :D

show me the program code :D

_start(){ //Bla bla bla }

?

?

main need libc

_start(){ //Bla bla bla }

i'd like to see the full code

Entry point on Linux is _start

Entry point on Linux is _start

no

no

Yes

Nope

Yep

.x64 START SEGMENT USE64 BUFFER_SIZE equ 100000 _INIT PROC NEAR _INIT ENDP END_PTR equ $ START ENDS END _INIT compiles well under linux

_start(){ //Bla bla bla }

Try, build with gcc -nostdlib

Naturally crash because you Need to exit

_start(){ //Bla bla bla }

even vscode is like "wtf is this shit"?

😂

asm bla bla bla int 0x80 bla bla bla

even vscode is like "wtf is this shit"?

return types exist 😉

Naturally crash because you Need to exit

That doesn't have anything to do with the validness and correct entry-point he's exporting not called _start

That doesn't have anything to do with the validness and correct entry-point he's exporting not called _start

^

_start neither is a linux thing at all either, its a GNU thing

[maximilian@localhost vbextreme]$ gcc ./t1.cpp -nostdlib ./t1.cpp:1:9: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of ‘_start’ with no type [-fpermissive] _start () { ^ [maximilian@localhost vbextreme]$