MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Okay I'm not gonna even look at his photo
BinaryByter
why don't you want to look at 1/10 of his offspring?
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Dude I don't talk about this
BinaryByter
you know, the quoran allows for 4 wifes
BinaryByter
but he did even better than the quoran
BinaryByter
he has 5 :D
BinaryByter
@Drazzy make sure not to blow up next time you walk next to a church!
olli
and use jwasm as a compiler
Pretty sure JWASM is not a compiler ;)
BinaryByter
Pretty sure JWASM is not a compiler ;)
Why not call it a compiler?
BinaryByter
in the end it takes a dialect and produces bytecode off it
BinaryByter
Sure - if you want to separate a "highlevel" compiler from an assembler, go ahead
BinaryByter
but to me assembler just refers to the dialect of system near languages
BinaryByter
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Pretty sure JWASM is not a compiler ;)
Olli Any guide for Assembly?! For C++ sake
olli
Olli Any guide for Assembly?! For C++ sake
Yeah.. give a sec need to find them
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
olli
Okay Appreciated :)
What always helps is looking at the generated assembly e.g. on Godbolt and understand how calling conventions and argument passing works. free and online: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/X86_Assembly I enjoyed reading Practical Reverse Engineering Hacking - The Art of Exploration Reversing: Secrets of Reverse Engineering
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Does learning assembly require some knowledge?!!
BinaryByter
BinaryByter
12yo me pulled a compiler off without half your knowledge
BinaryByter
don't worry, you'll be fine!
Wim
Its easier than c
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Okay Thanks
BinaryByter
Its easier than c
its easier than C but using it is harder
BinaryByter
the hard part of assembler is actually keeping everything understandable to the programmer
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
its easier than C but using it is harder
The same as C is easier than C++ But using it is harder
Wim
Just start simple, start optimising when you understand it
Dima
OOPSIEEEE
Dima
Mihail
Lmao
Dima
Oh.
Dima
oop
Dima
Multiparadigm oopsie
Wim
Oh crap, P2P was the one spamming in FSM, Max!
BinaryByter
Oh crap, P2P was the one spamming in FSM, Max!
he has to click here to prove he's human
BinaryByter
so he can stay
BinaryByter
he also joined the party's group
Wim
😂
BinaryByter
the party the PARTY is my favourite german party
Spirit
well i figured out i screwed up my fractions instead of .0625 i did .06125 so my app works now, but i still want to figure this out lol
Anonymous
Do you guys not use Simon's gban list?
Anonymous
Hello y'all......I'm Adebisi
Anonymous
I'm Nigerian and new here
Mihail
Do you guys not use Simon's gban list?
Can't, because owner is a deleted account
Mihail
So no feds
Anonymous
Hi
Swaroop
How can i use my own executible file in c in any directory
Swaroop
That means where should i put the executible file ? in /bin or /usr/bin
Ji
Hi
Ji
What is it about?
Ji
Okay to post referral link?
Nikolas
99.99999% no
Ji
Ok thanks
Mat
If we'll warn you, the answer was no :)
Ji
Ok thanks
Ji
If you're a gambling person, it's okay to DM me
Mat
That means where should i put the executible file ? in /bin or /usr/bin
~/.local/bin. Then add it to your path (ddg linux add path)
数学の恋人
hey guys I have an array of int datatype, now I want to increase each element of array by 1 how can I do that? I asked this because I'd like to avoid using loop
数学の恋人
hmm...
Mat
And if there's other ways, I'm pretty sure they're just syntactic sugars
Mat
You can get faster time using parallel behavior probably🤔
Francisco
Or vectorize 🤷‍♂
Anonymous
Mihail
hey guys I have an array of int datatype, now I want to increase each element of array by 1 how can I do that? I asked this because I'd like to avoid using loop
Loop, but that sounds like a weird thing to do. Give us some more context maybe? Because I'm pretty certain there's a better way which doesn't involve adding one to each element of the array
BinaryByter
but if you are operating on bytes, you can use string operations and repz
BinaryByter
to optimize for file size and pipelining
Mihail
of its just that, theres no better way
Yeah but if you need to increment all elements of an array you're probably not doing it correctly
Wim
Taken you know the size of the array, the only way is to emit just as much single increments on each element, in the end creating some sort of loop probably would be better, besides, your compiler might optimize each manual increment back to a loop as well
Wim
Memcpy would overwrite the actual array, so no incrementing takes place, besides, when used on a larger block, your compiler will emit a loop anyway as well or the used library would use one instead
BinaryByter
Yeah but if you need to increment all elements of an array you're probably not doing it correctly
the problem itself is only solvable by a loop, but if you have it, you might wanna rethink
Francisco
Yeah that's what I did
If you're in C++, you can even use the parallel STL