Daniele°
For this reason glibc have removed all assembly code
Wim
so you'd use libc for a bootloader? Where are you going to fit it, next to even loading it without support?
Daniele°
For this reason glibc have removed all assembly code
today, in the past the subject was completely different
Wim
The subject is the false claim c is a macro assembler
Wim
Do you use siemens their own toolchain btw?
Daniele°
No
Wim
Too bad😂 i was wondering if they were still using/distributing that
MᏫᎻᎯᎷᎷᎬᎠ
Daniele°
Go out to eating in street food
Wim
which one?
About the bootcode
BinaryByter
About the bootcode
Cant put my finger on it, which one?
Ибраги́м
Ибраги́м
probably
Just give up mate.
Daniele°
Just give up mate.
in some mcu there is only one dialect of his
Daniele°
And if you use C++ such as C, why not use directly C?
Ибраги́м
in some mcu there is only one dialect of his
There are three bad things we don't wish for: - A dwindling economy - A terrorist attack - An embedded platform with only C compiler.
Daniele°
can you argue better?
Ибраги́м
And if you use C++ such as C, why not use directly C?
4. Another reason why hate C and believe a lot C devs are ignoramuses. U simply don't use C++ as C.
Daniele°
or does your vocabulary start and end with insults?
Ибраги́м
Even C++ as C with Classes is better than C
Daniele°
Google Linus C++
Ибраги́м
Linus think different
Linus doesn't know everything. In fact his "crappy" rant is a big sign of ignorance.
Ибраги́м
And that rant will be black spot in his career ever
Ибраги́м
It's stupid, shortsighted, unresearched, egoistic...
Ибраги́м
everything except knowledge based
Mat
Google Linus C++
That's a real old opinion
Mat
Apart from the fact he created Linux 🤷‍♂️
Mat
started*
Created
Mat
There were no linux before
Ибраги́м
Created
Started*
Ибраги́м
He copied sth.
Mat
What's the difference?
Ибраги́м
What's the difference?
Sth from Sth < Sth from nothing
Mat
If i start a project creating a kernel, what's the point about started/created?
Mat
He created Linux, not the definition of kernel
Ибраги́м
Linus think different
He also thinks it's good to do: for (i = 0; i < strlen(s); ++i) { } right ?
olli
There are three bad things we don't wish for: - A dwindling economy - A terrorist attack - An embedded platform with only C compiler.
I prefer a car whose Software is written in C with safety rated compilers than C++ compiled with any compiler. (or plane, train, ...)
olli
NOW change C to C++ and C++ to C.
why should I? I am still unaware of a "safe" C++ compiler
Ибраги́м
Different Industry with different specs
Ибраги́м
Some even use Ada so...
Ибраги́м
In a language riddled with unsafety ?
Ибраги́м
👍
olli
.... and then you oppose to using cpp11 in clinl?
if you pay for the license I'm keen to use c11 (:
BinaryByter
lol
Dima
why so much hate about C I see lately
Dima
my waifu language
BinaryByter
why so much hate about C I see lately
why use C if you can use Cpp? if you want efficiency of a higher level lang go for pas
olli
why so much hate about C I see lately
I don't get it either. Most of them have proably never written proper C
olli
*Most of them have probably never worked on a large codebase anyway
Dima
kinda like that comparison
BinaryByter
why eating pizza when you can eat spaghetti
Cpp has quite a big list of features that add to C
BinaryByter
Classes
BinaryByter
Lambdas
BinaryByter
Constexpr
BinaryByter
Full OOP
BinaryByter
real const
BinaryByter
an extensive standard library
Dima
Lambdas
typedef bool (*MyObj)(int a, int b); :troll:
Dima
an extensive standard library
that is bloated right away
Dima
No, I won’t tell something against cxx, I love it, but kek
BinaryByter
Anonymous
Is C++ really a superset of C?
BinaryByter
Is C++ really a superset of C?
almost, it changes a few things in C
BinaryByter
pointer type safety, for example
olli
pointer type safety, for example
void* is valid C++ as well
BinaryByter
void* is valid C++ as well
I said pointer TYPE safety
BinaryByter
you cant cast a pointer to another