but really, its just a pointer to some machine code

why not just write something like this for(int i=0; i<3;++i){}

for(int i=0; i<3;++i){ print("%d", i); }

You can start with let us c++

You will get pdf on internet.

Why this doesn't work in theory: #define loop (;;) forloop//must be preprocessed for(;;), right?! It gives me a compiler error But I thought preprocessor replaces every macro with the text that's defined with. Does that mean preprocessor translate separated words and doesn't replace macros arbitrary?🤔 Or I just answered my question!!! Lol

Why this doesn't work in theory: #define loop (;;) forloop//must be preprocessed for(;;), right?! It gives me a compiler error But I thought preprocessor replaces every macro with the text that's defined with. Does that mean preprocessor translate separated words and doesn't replace macros arbitrary?🤔 Or I just answered my question!!! Lol

If this would be the case, imagine the macro min. How would you be able to use functions such as std::min_element ? Writing for loop in your example works fine.

Do this instead: #define LOOP for(;;)

And the use it like LOOP{ // Statements }

I'm completely done..

I can ban you 69 times

We should ban some people to have exactly 7000 members

we shall ban member number 897

let's give admin to everyone so they can ban themselves

I didn't mean to offtopic, It was more like shitposting (and that's allowed)

let's give admin to everyone so they can ban themselves

If void type function doesn't returns everything so my main which is a void function return 0 when no errors?

According to the ISO C and C++ standards main returns an int. Please do not use void main ().

ISO C allows void main though ( while C++ don't

Can you cite the standard document please?

Can you cite the standard document please?

ISO C allows void main though ( while C++ don't

Where

Agree that better avoid void main 😏

In system when a program or software is complete it work and about to complete it execution then is send a signal to system ( either a 0 or any other integer). If it give 0 then system will understand that the program or software is executed successfully and if it's any another integer then it gives a unsuccessful execution signal to the system. That's why we write return 0; Mean our program will give a successful execution signal if it execute without any error or issue. So int main, main is preferred over void main.

5.1.2.2.3 defines ") reaching the } that terminates the main function returns a value of 0. If the return type is not compatible with int, the termination status returned to the host environment is unspecified"

Modified, still no improved results

link then staticaly

Literal have fixed value which can't be changed

Yay I think

Who gave you permission?

But this isn't in rules.