Read from the start the discussion and read your question again and my original point...

You're trying to prove that C++ is all OOP by stating that a function std::cout? What about printf? Someone wrote that for you.

You're trying to prove that C++ is all OOP by stating that a function std::cout? What about printf? Someone wrote that for you.

You can write object oriented C without C++. I wouldn't recommend it since I believe OOP is evil, but who am I to say how one should program?

I'm not trying to prove anything, you're trying to prove I'm wrong and talking about python? Why?

My point is every language has their own libraries and functions. That doesn't make their language Object Oriented Programming specific. I bring up Python and JS because they get the most praise for being functional languages. Especially Haskell. But each one of these has their own libraries that someone else wrote. It's how you use them that determines the difference between OOP and Functional programming.

So I would suggest you learn a bit of GUI programming and then see the difference between C and C++, right now with "Command Prompt" programs you're unable to understand the power of C++.

Lol bud, my current job I am programming a Graphical Interface to render Microscopic Images for biologists. I know the power of C++. I am just telling you, that C++ is not Object Oriented C. C++ is C++, it is it's own language. If you want to suffer and write OOC you can, but C++ gets that misconception that it is just C but Objective. Which is not true.

Lol bud, my current job I am programming a Graphical Interface to render Microscopic Images for biologists. I know the power of C++. I am just telling you, that C++ is not Object Oriented C. C++ is C++, it is it's own language. If you want to suffer and write OOC you can, but C++ gets that misconception that it is just C but Objective. Which is not true.

'C++ is not just oop c' LISTEN TO THIS MAN! finally someone smart :D

Do you know what is an object? It's not a function to start with... objects are something different... 1. Objects created could be pure variable with mix of methods 2. Objects can be like using in C# or even C++ (when programming in Windows or GUI) 3. C cannot create that kind of objects as you have to call functions and handle created Windows yourself.

Lol bud, my current job I am programming a Graphical Interface to render Microscopic Images for biologists. I know the power of C++. I am just telling you, that C++ is not Object Oriented C. C++ is C++, it is it's own language. If you want to suffer and write OOC you can, but C++ gets that misconception that it is just C but Objective. Which is not true.

on machine level code, everything is just bits anyway

objects CAN be functions. Look at the es5 hack for OOP => constructor functions

objects CAN be functions. Look at the es5 hack for OOP => constructor functions

No everything is nothing but charges... actually everything is just electrons... you could go deeper... but overall function != Methods... why? Because methods are part of an object, without object being created you can't call the method.'

how about static methods?

What is the best IDE for C++ in linux OS.. ?

Everything in C++ is OOP even if you think you're not using it, you are.

Err no, you can just go full functional or procedural in C++ and tbh it is often better

Then use C or even better BASIC... why go with C++?

Because C is not functional and lacks real type safety mechanism as well as the ability to code monads and stuff for example

C++ is not functional either... and if you want functional languages use Fortran.

Why bother with something that isn't designed for your requirement?

C++ is OOP... it's not designed to be functional or procedural.

What I see is you want to bend things and not use them as they are supposed to be... that is weird when you have purely functional languages like Heskel.

In what way? C++ have lots of elements of functional programming languages, they even added a bunch of monads in C++14 and 17

Yeah but no one in the world would say C++ is a functional langauge, they would say it's Object Oriented Language...

Yeah but no one in the world would say C++ is a functional langauge, they would say it's Object Oriented Language...

I think that is mostly because most people live in ignorance of what C++ is and assume C++~=Java

I think that is mostly because most people live in ignorance of what C++ is and assume C++~=Java

The misconception of CPP is OOP is stupid

Ludovic, you are wasting your time debating with stupid strangers. Lets code the clinl website instead

Whole reason why C++ was started was to make C an OOP.

Ludovic, you are wasting your time debating with stupid strangers. Lets code the clinl website instead

Wait.. where’s webcpp

Webcpp is a dead meme

s/a dead meme/dead

I doubt that. read the cpp design requirements

Read it's history.

Whole reason why C++ was started was to make C an OOP.

https://mathbits.com/MathBits/CompSci/Introduction/history.htm

When he designed C++, he added OOP (Object Oriented Programming) features to C without significantly changing the C component.

That is what C++ was in 1987

That is why it was invented...