BinaryByter
a standard which tells a compiler how to output code would be a pseudocode of a compiler
BinaryByter
(nobody would want to read that, tbh)
Rahul
You proved optimization not works on based of standards then how it works
Rahul
Someone tells compiler to use 0 in case of optimizations who said
BinaryByter
You proved optimization not works on based of standards then how it works
the compiler optimizes how it wants
Rahul
Obviously coder
BinaryByter
as long as it outputs something that complies to the standard
BinaryByter
(thats why the standard is that lose)
Rahul
System programmer who writes the compiler will write the way optimization works we cannot say it is running over the air without knowing
BinaryByter
we can because GCC documents their stuff
Mihail
System programmer who writes the compiler will write the way optimization works we cannot say it is running over the air without knowing
"we cannot say it is running over the air without knowing" huh?
klimi
Thanks for... Commenting
Rahul
"we cannot say it is running over the air without knowing" huh?
You right . Answer is not generic we don't know what requirement is old std or new std of c . So it's better to assign
Mihail
just don't as we just proved it adds unneccessary runtime cost
Mihail
so like
Mihail
don't
Rahul
Because of extra instruction
Mihail
exactly
Rahul
Processors are so fast like 10nmare you using ibm old systems
Rahul
10nm 7nm
BinaryByter
yea, please dont behave like those people who think that because processors are fast they may clutter my computer
Mihail
Processors are so fast like 10nmare you using ibm old systems
you totally sound like someone who would code his OS in python and node.js
Mihail
jUsT bEcAuSe tHe hArdWaRe iS fAsT
Mihail
you totally sound like someone who would code his OS in python and node.js
just a few extra instructions, amirite?
Rahul
So you happy with that not to use
Rahul
You failed Google progammers
Rahul
Not to use that approach
BinaryByter
just a few extra instructions, amirite?
lol, with some obscure black magix guy, I write ASM code that tries hard to save BYTES IN THE FUCKING BYTECODEFILE
BinaryByter
"use that OPCODE, since its only one byte instead of that other opcode which is two bytes"
Mihail
lol, with some obscure black magix guy, I write ASM code that tries hard to save BYTES IN THE FUCKING BYTECODEFILE
tbh i'd much rather be this guy, than the one who'd write everything in python and node.js
BinaryByter
BinaryByter
that guy is such a genius
Rahul
Program Instructions did tell time completely. Why do you think like
Rahul
It depends upon operations on input size
BinaryByter
Program Instructions did tell time completely. Why do you think like
you cannot measure the time of a program instruction since they depend on so many things
Rahul
You didn't calculate tie complexity
BinaryByter
you can, however, calculate how many CPU cycles
Rahul
Do you know we evaluate speed based on time complexity
Rahul
Why you worry about instructions
Rahul
First thing
BinaryByter
they express two different things
Rahul
Software engineer don't cares about the instru5
BinaryByter
we evaluate scalability based on time complexity
Rahul
They just checking the time complexity and space
Mihail
Why you worry about instructions
why are you trying to convince us that doing unneccessary op's is better than not doing them?
BinaryByter
🤔
Rahul
Because you tell what developers don't do
BinaryByter
(and people like you)
Rahul
You calucalte wrongly based on instructions
BinaryByter
CPP is still the fastest language to do stuff in
klimi
Gn
BinaryByter
You calucalte wrongly based on instructions
so you are telling me that doing /2 instead of » 2 100.000.000.000 in a row will be exactly as fast?
Rahul
Why Google hire people who do time complexity instead of counting program instructions
Rahul
Your answer must be generic
Mihail
You calucalte wrongly based on instructions
so are you implying that doing the two move op's is faster?
Mihail
than literally nothing
Rahul
The way you calculate speed is not correct
Mihail
lol
Rahul
Time
BinaryByter
Rahul
I'm telling him if I give him large program then he count instructions
Rahul
Why not from time complexity
BinaryByter
you give me a larg program I will refactor it
Rahul
Refactor is last step
Rahul
Please
BinaryByter
Why not from time complexity
okay lets do it like this:
when do we use a regular watch, when do we use a watch with nanoseconds?
klimi
Rather have messy code than faster program
Rahul
You do refactor at first step