But like... what could be causing my problem?

MCVE would make it possible for us to figure it out :)

🤔

thanks to you

therefore v [10] = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}; random_shuffle(v[0], v[9]);

no

you need a begin and an end iterator

but you can just use std::array (which has them)

no

And howw

therefore v [10] = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}; random_shuffle(v[0], v[9]);

std::random_device randDevice; std::mt19937 randNumGen(randDevice()); std::array<int, 10> arr = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}; std::random_shuffle(arr.begin(), arr.end(), randNumGen);

i think this will work

haven't tested it tho

oh and you'll need <random> and <algorithm>

You aren't even that active tho

template <int N> struct Factorial { static constexpr int result = N * Factorial<N - 1>::result; }; template <> struct Factorial<0> { static constexpr int result = 1; };

you need a begin and an end iterator

you can use "pointers" as well, and there is std::begin for an array

template <int N> struct Factorial { static constexpr int result = N * Factorial<N - 1>::result; }; template <> struct Factorial<0> { static constexpr int result = 1; };

recursion, not demonic TMP recursion material

>:D

recursion, not demonic TMP recursion material

It is recursion.

template <int N> struct Factorial { static constexpr int result = N * Factorial<N - 1>::result; }; template <> struct Factorial<0> { static constexpr int result = 1; };

"easier to understand" *doubt intensifies*

xD

template <int N> struct Factorial { static constexpr int result = N * Factorial<N - 1>::result; }; template <> struct Factorial<0> { static constexpr int result = 1; };

^

look at flood fill

i used it recently

Yep

look at flood fill

look at fractals

look at fractals

look at Francis

For recursion or for TMP?

Depending on what you're doing. If I do much TMP stuff, I use recursion (cause you only can use recursion there), but else I don't use it. It's slower and less efficient than iteration, but easier to read.

Some math stuff and some implementations for trees are easier with recursion

But that are rare cases

std::random_device randDevice; std::mt19937 randNumGen(randDevice()); std::array<int, 10> arr = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}; std::random_shuffle(arr.begin(), arr.end(), randNumGen);

What is it my19937?

What is it my19937?

random number generator

What is it my19937?

mesmere twister

What is it my19937?

https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/numeric/random/mersenne_twister_engine

Yes. What I should note: If you write your recursive function in a special manner, the compiler will try to do tail call optimization. If it works it's great, the compiler will optimize your recursion to a loop. But if that doesn't work your function will spam the stack and will be way slower.

random number generator

Thanks , now I try

Yes. What I should note: If you write your recursive function in a special manner, the compiler will try to do tail call optimization. If it works it's great, the compiler will optimize your recursion to a loop. But if that doesn't work your function will spam the stack and will be way slower.

tail call optimization? who needs that

lets spam the stack

lets spam the stack

perfection

lets spam the stack

"Said webkit-gtk and needed 8MB stack size"

I know :)

webkit-gtk still don't work with musl. No big loss tbh, but still weird

Hi all

I think that probably I’ll become crazy...

Any ideas why it say ”stack smashing detected”?

Show us the code

But don't you dare sending a photo :^)

Any ideas why it say ”stack smashing detected”?

Hahahahahaha

But don't you dare sending a photo :^)

In which other way I can show you if not??

Franchesco, i like your name written in japanese

In which other way I can show you if not??

Put it here with formating, or if the code is too long, give us a pastebin link.

In which other way I can show you if not??

pastebin.com

I don't have time... Can, only for this time, send you a photo?

🙃🙃

therefore v [10] = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}; random_shuffle(v[0], v[9]);

use v, v+v.size() instead

I don't have time... Can, only for this time, send you a photo?

No, pasting some stuff at pastebin doesn't take much time

[Error] #error This file requires compiler and library support for the ISO C++ 2011 standard. This support is currently experimental, and must be enabled with the -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 compiler options.

xd

the same error tells you the solution man

End is near!

Nothing... It’s my name... F R A N C E S C O

Hello

Thank you 😊

Is technical service desk is a software job??

What is strong logic for reversing a number ? I used this but my seniors saying it now that strong while(number>0) a=number % 10; printf("%d",a); number=number / 10; Any one can tell me strong logic for this ?

Misteck on 3rd line : It not strong logic***

it does not provide correct answer there a logical error i can not solve it😞

Amean doesn't give exactly Average

Hey, anyone could help me with this snippet of C++ code? The compiler reports error for no declaration of status, but I think it's visible in the dirved class template. MWE: https://gist.github.com/Liam0205/c7b58df8b97d74ea049c1bd6146b6a19

Any clues would be appreciated.

Compile it with -std=c++11, such as g++ -std=c++11 mwe.cc

Hey, anyone could help me with this snippet of C++ code? The compiler reports error for no declaration of status, but I think it's visible in the dirved class template. MWE: https://gist.github.com/Liam0205/c7b58df8b97d74ea049c1bd6146b6a19

It's fixed. The problem is that status and temper are non-dependent names, which means that they are independent to template parameters. Hence, when they are looked up is not specified in the C++ standard. GCC looks them up at template parsing time, and hence they are lack of declaration. On the other hand, VC++ looks them up at template instaniation time, hence they are well declared. To fix this problem, one is going to make them back to dependent name by this pointer or by base class template field operator base<foo, bar>::. In my case, the following code works: this->status interface::temper

Kk

Yes. TMP is great.

Hello everyone

How to connect Sql database with c using codeblock

How to connect Sql database with c using codeblock

Depending on your database search for a C library that can interact with it