what is there to insert

data

duhh

xDD

like

oh like

1,2,3 to 1,2,4,3

?

hi

Hi

Hi

Ariana plss can u pc? I need some help

just send here...

i h problem with mass storage u nit T.T

[ +0.000005] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Add. Sense: Medium format corrupted [ +0.000009] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] 0 512-byte logical blocks: (0 B/0 B) [ +0.000004] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] 0-byte physical blocks [ +0.002938] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Test WP failed, assume Write Enabled [ +0.003060] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Asking for cache data failed [ +0.000006] sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Assuming drive cache: write through

Ariana plss can u pc? I need some help

"pc"?

prob private chat

wow

alright i try to explain in simple like if we need to insert data in 1d array we first increment the size of array then store the recent data on its next position and then the store the value at desired location alright then how can we do that operation in pointer-array

increment size of array?

thats a thing?

why not?

Don’t you have to realloc

yes

or else some weird heap stuff get overwritten

an array is just a bunch of memory that is next to eachother

Yes

yes

ya bt i am new to malloc ,calloc and realloc

Yes

😳😳

ya bt i am new to malloc ,calloc and realloc

man *

😳😳

what did you think that an array is?

realloc is basically freeing and re-allocating the array with a new size basically a free and malloc combined

realloc is basically freeing and re-allocating the array with a new size basically a free and malloc combined

no, its not (always) freeing

no, its not (always) freeing

If it doesnt need to then yeah

but its effectively the same

an array is just a bunch of memory that is next to eachother

i know that bt dont know a lot about pointer-array just was trying the above code

google's got your back

look up realloc examples

it’s basically same as malloc

realloc is basically freeing and re-allocating the array with a new size basically a free and malloc combined

ok

it’s basically same as malloc

wow

xD

Its true

one is relatively easy to implement

the other is not xD

Omt lets not talk about implementing realloc

just shut up and let dl do it

okay :)

ok will try it and say

welcome

Do anyone have study material for object oriented computer programming

you were told to read the rules

hiii

Do anyone have study material for object oriented computer programming

yes we do

Hi

/warn no

sorry but such stuff is not allowed, who knows maybe you are a scammer

What did he do?

[Plain C] I'm storing some data on (characters) for analyze it on my code. Actually i'm using this struct idea: struct data { char sample[]; int size; } channel1; i want to make an efficient variable lenght arry definition, but i know it's a problem not to define the lenght BEFORE modifyng. So if I use that struct and then: for( w=0;w<N;w++) { delay_ms(20); potval = read_adc(); channel1.sample[w] = potval >> 2; delay_ms(200); } The problem is that using another for structure like this one doesn't print all N values stored. but if i do the struct seems this way: struct data { char sample[10]; int size; } channel1; Works fine, but what i mean it's the lenght should be a user input. So, do you guys have a good idea about how to solve this ?

hi

if (year % 4 == 0)return true;

No. Your formula is the Julian calendar (a leap year every four years), which was used long long ago in the past. The calendar that we are using now, is the Gregorian calendar, where century years are not leap years except every 400 years.

Actually, if you really need to determine whether a year is a leap year in real world in history rather than the theoretical rule what we are using now, you might need to separate the year 1582.

Before 1582, people used the Julian calendar, and after 1582, people use the Gregorian calendar.

This is the real world bool is_leap_year(int n) { if (n < 1582) { // Julian calendar: // a leap year every four years if (n % 4 == 0) return true; else return false; } else { // Gregorian calendar: // a leap year every four years, // but except century years, // but including every 400 years if (n % 400 == 0) return true; if (n % 100 == 0) return false; if (n % 4 == 0) return true; return false; } }

shorter: bool IsLeapYear(int32 year) { if ((year % 4) == 0) { return ((year % 100 != 0) || (year % 400 == 0)); } return false; }

who needs 1582 year in their code?

maybe time machine developers

In 1582, the calendar rule changed. That is the reason why it is coded like this.

yeah I read

The day after 4 October 1582 was 15 October 1582 😀

Hey @ROSE i'm new to C language, hence needed help from the pro ones , hence i joined the group . Can you guys help me with it, or is this group only for pro ones

The day after 4 October 1582 was 15 October 1582 😀

That is what happens when you miss your calculations

Is it actually possible?

That is what happens when you miss your calculations

This is just because the rule changed on that day.

Hey @ROSE i'm new to C language, hence needed help from the pro ones , hence i joined the group . Can you guys help me with it, or is this group only for pro ones

uh

This is just because the rule changed on that day.

The rule changed because they noticed they used a wrong number of days in the year

I think ‘pro ones’ refer to people who can read

can’t we have better non-arbitrary rules

A sidereal year is about 365+1/(4-1/(10+13-(... gives much better approximations

ohgosh