SDDM is not KDE project.

But it's KDE's default, so....

But it's KDE's default, so....

?

But it's KDE's default, so....

wut ?

lightweight ?

wut ?

KDE chooses SDDM as it's DM.

lightweight ?

are you sure about this point , idr if it really was lightweight tbh

anyway I am not gonna crash my lil ubuntu

damn that looks cool

damn that looks cool

what has attracted me is , its a native look

not themes or something like that

this is what i was waiting for , some work on both sides , the core and the UI

anyway I am not gonna crash my lil ubuntu

Well, this explains why you don't find it lightwight....

However, the same can be done with vagrant and ansible.

I'm going to use ansible to create new environments at work soon : D

Yeah, containers have their uses and sure are fun to learn but they aren't really useful for most traditional developers

They're useful for a specific subset of tasks

Outside of that, not very useful

I like the fingerprint icon haha

Containers are cool for servlet and distributed stuff kek

I've started learning ansible

http://selinuxgame.org/

That's a cute doggo

I like the fingerprint icon haha

https://blogs.gnome.org/aday/files/2018/05/lock-unlock.webm?_=1

the video

They're useful for a specific subset of tasks

But some treat them like the next generation of THE INTERNET EVERYTHING

the animations are kinda nice

https://blogs.gnome.org/aday/files/2018/05/lock-unlock.webm?_=1

Haha that made me smile

Well, this explains why you don't find it lightwight....

lol

But some treat them like the next generation of THE INTERNET EVERYTHING

That's always the thing with new tech and soyboys

But some treat them like the next generation of THE INTERNET EVERYTHING

For a lot of software they're just better versions of flatpaks tbh

ReWrItE tHe LiNuX kErNeL iN rUsT

For a lot of software they're just better versions of flatpaks tbh

Yeah but everything has its limits. And unless you know a crapton about them getting containers to the point where they are as sane and isolated as vms you could've used a vm.

ReWrItE tHe LiNuX kErNeL iN rUsT

In a docker container

In a docker container

???

In a docker container

I need a Xorg container.

This is just so cute.... I don't know how it is related to Wouter's message though.#

This is just so cute.... I don't know how it is related to Wouter's message though.#

He will be like that when getting a taste of ansible

Ah.

Like a croissant?

He will be like that when getting a taste of ansible

Is it good?

You know I learned about ansible because of another very enthousiast german ??

Like a croissant?

A really good croissant, of which i had none so far xD

Is it good?

really good.

Even as lazy sysmin you can use it to execute commands in parallel, like update 400 servers at the same time.

Even as lazy sysmin you can use it to execute commands in parallel, like update 400 servers at the same time.

Cool

I have to check integration with gitlab ci tho

Or, more sophisticated, manage config files and key deployment and and and across several hundred machines

Or, more sophisticated, manage config files and key deployment and and and across several hundred machines

That was my plan haha

I've been playing with my raspberry pi stack and ansible

We're also planning on moving to hetzner.cloud for hosting

Blur! Finally! ???

They have integration with ansible as well which is nice

Blur! Finally! ???

yeah , generally some efforts on the UI

We're also planning on moving to hetzner.cloud for hosting

Nice. But keep in mind hetzner is really uneasy pretty quickly if you get lots of traffic.

Nice. But keep in mind hetzner is really uneasy pretty quickly if you get lots of traffic.

Hmm? Tell me more?

Hmm? Tell me more?

If you get continually three to ten times the traffic hetzner will nullroute it and ask you kindly to take care of the problem.

To get proper ddos protection if you have high load or controversial content you might want to use cloudflare infront or ovh instead

this gif is very funny ? so cute

If you get continually three to ten times the traffic hetzner will nullroute it and ask you kindly to take care of the problem.

What do you mean with three to ten times the traffic?

What do you mean with three to ten times the traffic?

Hetzner gives you gigabit

Yes

If you get ddosed with 3 they'll get uneasy.

Oh okay

Any higher and they'll ask you to take care of the source or move on.

Do they just block traffic for an hour?

Do they just block traffic for an hour?

They nullroute you and send you a mail.

?

Is 3gbps ddos a lot?

ERROR: S client not available

So yeah, if you have ddos issues or lots of idiots hating you dont go hetzner

Is 3gbps ddos a lot?

Its laughable, thats three servers from someone else.

We're hosting a Minecraft server so it's not like we're getting that much traffic

We're hosting a Minecraft server so it's not like we're getting that much traffic

Then go ahead

?

But a cranky skiddie you ban could take it down with just a few cheap vps-es of his own.

If we get ddossed we might have another problem as well ?

But a cranky skiddie you ban could take it down with just a few cheap vps-es of his own.

That's right

What's the best way to deal with ddossing anyway?

cloudflare

What's the best way to deal with ddossing anyway?

A hoster that comes with protection for it.

cloudflare

I don't like them

cloudflare

Only if you dont mind all your ssl being broken by them.

vultr provides DDoS protection for an extra fee

I think it's about 6 USD a month

A hoster that comes with protection for it.

What does that protection do? Just block traffic from certain sources?

What does that protection do? Just block traffic from certain sources?

Firewalls trying to find out "typical" ddos traffic, blocking SYN flooding, blocking other crap...

Firewalls trying to find out "typical" ddos traffic, blocking SYN flooding, blocking other crap...

Hmm okay

Maybe hetzner will get that in the future

There's some really cool tech for SYN flood prevention that I was reading about recently

There's some really cool tech for SYN flood prevention that I was reading about recently

SYN Cookies.

I suspect everyone in here already knows, but syn cookies are awesome

Enabled by default in every sane os

I know that now, but reading about it recently was really interesting

Nice thing is everything we're going to deploy on hetzner is going to be managed from ansible so moving to another host wouldn't be that much of an issue

SYN Cookies.

What does that do?

Minecraft doesn't use HTTP traffic so if there HTTP cookies they're of no use xd

Basically it doesn't open a connection waiting for the return ACK from the host, it embeds a connection ID wich is logged in a table so memory isn't consumed holding open channels for hosts that aren't responding to the SYN-ACK

It's a layer 5 implementation so Minecraft can utilise it

Basically it doesn't open a connection waiting for the return ACK from the host, it embeds a connection ID wich is logged in a table so memory isn't consumed holding open channels for hosts that aren't responding to the SYN-ACK

That's TCP or nah?

It's a layer 5 implementation so Minecraft can utilise it

Afaik its in the network stack so MC wouldnt need to worry about it.

yeah, it's at layer 5 isn't it?