ok , thanks

As far as I'm concerned, most of people don't give a shit for cryptocurrencies.

Tell that to the 100k people who are part of these crypto channels and spam groups because they will be paid in some cryptocurrency. Heck, I personally know an idiot who jumped on the crypto bandwagon last year and joined lots of telegram groups about that. Bitcoin's rise in value only solidified his belief. Maybe it is a way to earn quick buck, but its shit and won't last long. Their intended use case is no longer the major one. Most of the people who buy them are wannabe investors.

And the one that will get you in deep problems with European privacy laws.

Yes? Why?

Yes? Why?

You need to name: Who you are working with, how they store data, how you store data, when it will be deleted, who is seeing that data, all persons who work with the data and and and and and

You need to name: Who you are working with, how they store data, how you store data, when it will be deleted, who is seeing that data, all persons who work with the data and and and and and

Got the point. Thanks.

And if you just send all data to a thirdparty service and miss an agb change from them for a day you might already be liable for lawsuits

South Korean Confirmed

You used it?

Tell that to the 100k people who are part of these crypto channels and spam groups because they will be paid in some cryptocurrency. Heck, I personally know an idiot who jumped on the crypto bandwagon last year and joined lots of telegram groups about that. Bitcoin's rise in value only solidified his belief. Maybe it is a way to earn quick buck, but its shit and won't last long. Their intended use case is no longer the major one. Most of the people who buy them are wannabe investors.

I know someone who's often talking about Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies, but he doesn't spam. He's quietly annoying.

You used it?

tbh i tried it, and it was sucks

You used it?

The North Korean distros iso's were leaked.

The North Korean distros iso's were leaked.

i know

tbh i tried it, and it was sucks

lol

The North Korean distros iso's were leaked.

Red Star? And how is it?

Afaik nautilus only offers zip, 7z and something else. Thats it.

You won't believe it but winrar has a command line Linux version that I had to compile to get it to work. And that thing bugs you about it being a free trial for 40 Days.

You won't believe it but winrar has a command line Linux version that I had to compile to get it to work. And that thing bugs you about it being a free trial for 40 Days.

I know, because i cant believe you didnt use unar/unrar instead :P

(unar is the blob-free version in fedora)

I know, because i cant believe you didnt use unar/unrar instead :P

Had to repair something. Didn't know about unrar

(unar is the blob-free version in fedora)

Also, why do they offer sources if they are commercial software?

Also, why do they offer sources if they are commercial software?

They dont.

Its a reverse engineered open sauce version

They dont.

What's the targz file on the site. It has a make file and stuff.

open sauce

7-Zip (LZMA2) is better than RAR.

https://www.rarlab.com/rar/rarlinux-5.6.b2.tar.gz

https://www.rarlab.com/rar/rarlinux-5.6.b2.tar.gz

Blobbed crap.

https://www.rarlab.com/rar/rarlinux-5.6.b2.tar.gz

kek

https://www.rarlab.com/rar/rarlinux-5.6.b2.tar.gz

If you need unrar, you can install it from RPMFusion non-free repository.

If you need unrar, you can install it from RPMFusion non-free repository.

Or just use unar outright.

Does the same.

https://theunarchiver.com/command-line

Why did people use rar?

Oh, it's still a binary

Does the same.

I think it needs unrar library to unpack RAR archives.

Why did people use rar?

Because idiots installed winrar and it became popular.

I think it needs unrar library to unpack RAR archives.

It doesnt.

Why did people use rar?

Repair rar files.

It can unpack RARv5, without any unrar binary.

It can unpack RARv5, without any unrar binary.

OK, nice.

Repair rar files.

If your files are "damaged" most of the time its to share pirated content with intentionally damaged containers.

Repair rar files.

Only later did I realize that Ark was able to do that too.

So they hope to fool law enforcement with it.

WinRAR is practically the standard in Wndows, few people use 7zip in spite of being better and open source

WinRAR is practically the standard in Wndows, few people use 7zip in spite of being better and open source

No. You are not right. Zip is standard.

WinRAR is practically the standard in Wndows, few people use 7zip in spite of being better and open source

I bet its the icons xD

zip is included in Windows, but when people want better compression results, they use WinRAR

zip is included in Windows, but when people want better compression results, they use WinRAR

And if they wanted the best they'd use 7z

zip is included in Windows, but when people want better compression results, they use WinRAR

Never seen RAR archives for the last 5 years.

But they never heard of anything else other than rarcrap.

No. You are not right. Zip is standard.

One targz to rule them all

but they don't know 7zip, so sad ?

Never seen RAR archives for the last 5 years.

They are absolutely rampant on file sharing sites.

One targz to rule them all

Targz is legacy. Use tarxz instead. XZ is a free implementation of 7z's LZMA2 algorithm.

In fact, Windows zip built-in is really slow. Uncompressing a zip file with 7zip is very much faster

They tar it and then gz/xz it right?

Targz is legacy. Use tarxz instead. XZ is a free implementation of 7z's LZMA2 algorithm.

It depends, gzip is quick at archiving big chunk of files, less compression ratio as a tradeoff

They tar it and then gz/xz it right?

The coolest way is tar - files | pigz > out.tar.gz

but brotli beats it, the drawback is compatibility, since not all systems have brotli

That will do multi-core compression.

That will do multi-core compression.

That's a great suggestion, thanks!

btw KDE Discover is crashing every time I launch

I think this is a Fedora KDE spin's problem...

but brotli beats it, the drawback is compatibility, since not all systems have brotli

Mostly for web content however, its compression ratio is less impressive for other things since brotli has a corelib that contains common html codewords which it doesnt for code afaik.

gz will remain as king of the fastest, supported everywhere, still kinda good compressing algos for some time..

I have used it to compress JSON files with very good results

I have used it to compress JSON files with very good results

Your server should do that on the fly for you however :P

with level compression 1 you get the same compression ratio that gzip but faster

And cache the result unless the filetime changes

ERROR: S client not available

and with level 4 a better compression ratio in the same time than gzip

btw KDE Discover is crashing every time I launch

Don't use it.

The purpose of brotli in this scenario is reading and writing with Python for a project, not browser responses

Use Apper or dnf instead of Discover.

files of around 150 GB

Source?

files of around 150 GB

Why the hell do you have 150gb json files.

Use Apper or dnf instead of Discover.

Any problems with Discover?

many JSON lines in fact

CDRs

it is a special case because the lines are sorted before compressing

CDRs

...shouldnt those be inside a database?

for better compression ratio

maybe, but I think it would be slower, at least without spending much time in creating a good NOSQL database

maybe, but I think it would be slower, at least without spending much time in creating a good NOSQL database

pgsql/elasticsearch, unless the client always wants all 150GB of data.

yes, all data has to be read

we read the data for movility studies

Because idiots installed winrar and it became popular.

This. And it was so easy to ignore the payment request.

This. And it was so easy to ignore the payment request.

That was intentional - private users could use it for free but companies that wanted to deploy it couldnt legally avoid paying. It was winrars entire tactic to get company money

Why does python still default to python2.7?

compatibility. It'll change soon

Maybe.

Why does python still default to python2.7?

Because alot of tools still depend and use python2.7 and take it as the default python.

But python3 should always specify python3 anyway

But python3 should always specify python3 anyway

Theres a PEP about this

Python 3.x, since python continued to support both sadly, is very very underdeveloped.

They are absolutely rampant on file sharing sites.

I agree with @xvitaly that is been a long while, it’s not that popular now. But it’s still there, annoying.

Okay, thanks.

Fedora and Python 2 [LWN.net] https://lwn.net/Articles/750833/

Fedora and Python 2 [LWN.net] https://lwn.net/Articles/750833/

One of the comments, ("When will the last Python 2 script execute? In 50-60 years?") made me think philosophically.

One of the comments, ("When will the last Python 2 script execute? In 50-60 years?") made me think philosophically.

Yes? How?