
Nick
12.04.2018
16:12:24
Between initd and systemd

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
16:13:04
Canonical code rarely leaves canonical projects
There was that fancy new init

Google

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
16:13:52
S6 or something like that. Lemmi hit the Google

Nick
12.04.2018
16:14:09
It's worse in compare with systemd

Sid
12.04.2018
16:14:35

Nick
12.04.2018
16:14:47
Rip

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
16:17:01
At worst, it's just another take on daemontools with a reliable base libraryand a few nifty features.
There you go, straight from the horse's mouth

itamarjp
12.04.2018
16:32:05
para quem vive en españa https://tmt.knect365.com/risc-v-workshop-barcelona/agenda/2

Sid
12.04.2018
16:33:06

itamarjp
12.04.2018
16:35:21

diffract
12.04.2018
16:36:34
Do you guys think google will commit to fuchsia?

Denis
12.04.2018
16:37:07
fuchsia is developed by google

Le Schyken
12.04.2018
16:37:34

Google

Le Schyken
12.04.2018
16:37:41
I'd love to see it get far

Саи Пранеетх Редды
12.04.2018
16:50:46

diffract
12.04.2018
16:58:06
But it wouldn't be the first time they worked on a project for quite a while before abandoning it

Le Schyken
12.04.2018
17:00:37

Саи Пранеетх Редды
12.04.2018
17:01:08
2 years
Oh wow! It's been two years already?

Tom
12.04.2018
17:07:01
The biggest advantage of Fuchsia is it's microkernel architecture, something Thompson and Ritchie saw in the early 80s as being the better architecture. Linux and it's monolithic architecture makes it less competitive against a well-written microkernel and, of the few people capable of writing a good microkernel, Google probably has half of them
In fact, that's what Plan 9 was. It was an experiment into converting the standard Unix userspace into a distributed microkernel based operating system

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
17:20:13
Friendly reminder that Hurd is indeed, a microkernel before it was cool

Victor Hugo
12.04.2018
18:01:58
a reminder that hurd failed and that linux is going to be a microkernel soon
tanenbaum will be vindicated

Le Schyken
12.04.2018
18:17:31

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:35:30

Саи Пранеетх Редды
12.04.2018
18:42:55
Don't mind me asking, my internet is just too slow for doing anything but sending messages.. What is the difference between a microkernel and a macrokernel?

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:43:12

Google

Fernando
12.04.2018
18:44:43
Amazing

f3d0r4us3r
12.04.2018
18:44:58

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:45:22

f3d0r4us3r
12.04.2018
18:45:37

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
18:46:25

Tom
12.04.2018
18:46:29
A micro kernel is essentially like a modular kernel
Plan 9 was one of, if not the first, microkernel based OSes

Le Schyken
12.04.2018
18:47:22

Tom
12.04.2018
18:47:54
Plan 9's forks are pretty good, so I'd say that the Bell Labs guys wrote the first properly decent microkernel

Саи Пранеетх Редды
12.04.2018
18:48:12

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
18:48:13
Hurd is one of the few good things GNU has done

Le Schyken
12.04.2018
18:48:34

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
18:49:23
It's just that it was really hard to write and Stallman was a bro and convinced Linus to open his already "finished" kernel

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:49:27

Tom
12.04.2018
18:50:38
When it comes to coreutils, you have plan9port which is lighter, BSD's which is faster and {toy,busy}box which is a hybrid. Basically, no matter which one you choose, they are better than GNU

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:50:43

Google

Tom
12.04.2018
18:51:51
OpenSolaris came out with one of the best C compilers, even if it wasn't the most featureful

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
18:52:10

Lambda
12.04.2018
18:52:12

Tobias?
12.04.2018
18:52:45

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:53:02

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
18:53:33

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:53:42

Admin
ERROR: S client not available

Tobias?
12.04.2018
18:54:29

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:54:35
So... one of the best things GNU did is an abandoned project...? well, that says a lot about GNU...

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
18:54:51

Tobias?
12.04.2018
18:54:53
Never got any real developer attention, lead by GNUtishist stallman, destined to be the laughing stock of kernels forever...

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
18:55:38
There's reasons
It's kinda like snap. It's been buried by flatpak but it's still brill

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:56:28
There's reasons
Wait, I need a Guinness to read this...
Okay, which are the reasons?
* opens the bottle *

Tobias?
12.04.2018
18:56:32
It's kinda like snap. It's been buried by flatpak but it's still brill
Got >4gb ram (now 8, but come on this is the cloud world. Every provider needs something that can handle 256gb ram at minimum)?
Got a cpu with >4 cores that you want to use for virtualisation?
Have any high-cycle demanding applications you need to manage in parallel?
Need a proper network stack for routers and general hardware that can do things like QoS?
Nope, forget all that on hurd.

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:57:26

Tom
12.04.2018
18:57:39
cc

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
18:58:24

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:58:32

Google

Tobias?
12.04.2018
18:59:06

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:59:23

Tobias?
12.04.2018
18:59:29
Big providers would've loved it for providing secure services running on an awesome virtualisation stack
But an OS stuck with 4 GB of max RAM?
Lol, never.

Kohane
12.04.2018
18:59:50

Tobias?
12.04.2018
18:59:54
Hurd could be THE cloud powering system today.
But stallman and hurd are still stuck on a platform dying quick.

Kohane
12.04.2018
19:00:47

Tobias?
12.04.2018
19:01:06
@Kohane
Since you're already online :P

Kohane
12.04.2018
19:01:15

Allanitomwesh
12.04.2018
19:01:30

Tobias?
12.04.2018
19:01:32
Obviously, isnt it?

Tom
12.04.2018
19:01:35
I can't read it, but it looks like it

Tobias?
12.04.2018
19:01:48
unsolicited joinlink and fully in russian.