ctrl-z undo last action, ctrl-shift-z/ or just ctrl-y: redo last undone action

Yeah, Ctrl+Z is universal, even Photoshop uses it. But redo varies with the program, and there is where I get lost.

Kohane-san.

Yeah, Ctrl+Z is universal, even Photoshop uses it. But redo varies with the program, and there is where I get lost.

CTRL+Z on LibreOffice Writer fails sometimes

Yeah, Ctrl+Z is universal, even Photoshop uses it. But redo varies with the program, and there is where I get lost.

Vim doesn't think so.

welp I don't have nano installed.

I can't care less. I use none of them.

x3

Neither I!

Vim doesn't think so.

why do you redirect your output to /dev/null?

welp I don't have nano installed.

you have, it comes by default on all Linux ?

if you don't want nano, nano wants you !

you have, it comes by default on all Linux ?

Not on arch, it doesn't

why do you redirect your output to /dev/null?

It is just irony.

thou shall not escape

Not on arch, it doesn't

Really? ➜ ~ nano --version GNU nano, version 2.9.4

Not on arch, it doesn't

It actually comes on arch.

hahaha

But maybe I have uninstalled it.

Not sure x3

Then I seriously messed something up. Lol.

But maybe I have uninstalled it.

true dat

I had no editor installed after a clean install

why do you redirect your output to /dev/null?

Pft, thats so 2017

Apart from Vi

yeas :D

why do you redirect your output to /dev/null?

https://devnull-as-a-service.com/

I had no editor installed after a clean install

how about cat?

one does not simply delete nano ?

https://devnull-as-a-service.com/

Please, we live in the X-AS-A-SERVICE World

unforseen consequences may occur

Really? ➜ ~ nano --version GNU nano, version 2.9.4

Just checked. I have Nano in Debian. Opened it, suffered a shock and immediately closed it.

how about cat?

A text editor. Why would one use cat? Its so pointless lol

you have, it comes by default on all Linux ?

It doesnt, even fedora and centos dont come default with it.

Just checked. I have Nano in Debian. Opened it, suffered a shock and immediately closed it.

hang on, calling 911 ☎️

They only come with vi.

unforseen consequences may occur

Are you kidding or not?

What exactly are you lost with? Lmao. Fedora is pretty straight forward imo

I have been a contributor for almost three years and I don't agree. ?

Are you kidding or not?

seriously

They only come with vi.

Which is a kind of ex..

when all things fail, nano was the fallback

A text editor. Why would one use cat? Its so pointless lol

Do you mean the animal?

when all things fail, nano was the fallback

vi is the fallback..

nope

when all things fail, nano was the fallback

*vi

I have been a contributor for almost three years and I don't agree. ?

Why tho?

nano is default on UNIX

Do you mean the animal?

cat is concatenation.

nano is default on UNIX

vi is.

Its even in posix i think.

vi is.

right.

Vague about what’s I mean , I’m lost about the schedule of fedora testing cuz i’m from QA team

@erMonacoo This group is more focused towards user support. If you have questions about contributing, you should direct them to @joinfedora, or if specific to Fedora QA, then @fedora_qa.

Its even in posix i think.

that's the $EDITOR ?

@erMonacoo This group is more focused towards user support. If you have questions about contributing, you should direct them to @joinfedora, or if specific to Fedora QA, then @fedora_qa.

Thanks Justin! Just joined.

how about cat?

cat isn't and editor. It's a concatenator. It just "print" stuff.

cat isn't and editor. It's a concatenator. It just "print" stuff.

Not just print.

Do you mean the animal?

Oh no!!!! Cats are NEVER pointless. They are the absolutely best adorable balls of fur!

cat isn't and editor. It's a concatenator. It just "print" stuff.

is there a dog as well ?

It takes N inputs and gives one output.

is there a dog as well ?

cat is not an animal!

reverse of cat is tac

Does user support includes moral aspects?

that's the $EDITOR ?

vi is always the fallback editor.

cat is conCATenation.

ERROR: S client not available

It takes N inputs and gives one output.

That is printing

tac ourputs in reverse

All systems ship vi, even the most minimal ones.

reverse of cat is tac

Reverse of dog is god. :P

That is printing

Ok so tell me the difference between echo, printf and cat.

Oh no!!!! Cats are NEVER pointless. They are the absolutely best adorable balls of fur!

I agree. And some of them can read. Unfortunately they can't write with our keyboards, their fingers are too short. ?

Actually is the | operator who sends and output to other input. It's not cat

All systems ship vi, even the most minimal ones.

not gentoo stage 1

Posix demands a vi-like (thus just pack vi) editor to fulfil posix

?

All systems ship vi, even the most minimal ones.

gentoo ships nano

tac ourputs in reverse

Wait. It actually exists?

not gentoo stage 1

gentoo is an outlier for many things.

Wait. It actually exists?

indeed it is

Why tho?

It is a large project with a large community. There are three different editions of Fedora that focus on three different spaces. There are currently three objectives that focus on large and abstract (but really cool) areas. The only things that are straightforward are the areas I contribute or use Fedora because that is my experience. ? For example, modularity is one of the largest focuses in Fedora, but I am definitely not the right person to explain it to you.

But every distro thats not a hobbyist project ever ships vi and if at most drops nano.

is there a dog as well ?

It would be fair, but no.

Ok so tell me the difference between echo, printf and cat.

echo can be used with environmental variables, cat doesn't. printf is a fallback for c programmers

Thanks Justin! Just joined.

@Kohane ?

Does user support includes moral aspects?

Moral aspects like what?

echo can be used with environmental variables, cat doesn't. printf is a fallback for c programmers

Not environment variables, but shell variables...

And echo don't actually work with them.

It just echo'es all passed command line arguments back.

Not environment variables, but shell variables...

Well, you got the idea. I'm typing with one hand and pain is started before time, so give me a break

I agree. And some of them can read. Unfortunately they can't write with our keyboards, their fingers are too short. ?

As long as there's a cat, I don't care what it does. I'm just gonna let it do whatever it wants, lol. But I'm absolutely terrified of teen/adult dogs.

Well, you got the idea. I'm typing with one hand and pain is started before time, so give me a break

Okay, nevermind.

Also, I use ccat (an alias for pygmentize)

or zcat

for archivez

It is a large project with a large community. There are three different editions of Fedora that focus on three different spaces. There are currently three objectives that focus on large and abstract (but really cool) areas. The only things that are straightforward are the areas I contribute or use Fedora because that is my experience. ? For example, modularity is one of the largest focuses in Fedora, but I am definitely not the right person to explain it to you.

Oh wait. We were talking about contributing. My bad :) I mistook it for using fedora. Sorry :P

Oh wait. We were talking about contributing. My bad :) I mistook it for using fedora. Sorry :P

Using is a tiny contribution already :P

Using is a tiny contribution already :P

LFS :P