The help message was just to tell you that if anything had been downloaded you could clean it with that.

Dnf tells you that it couldnt reach the mirror it tried to connect to. Do you have ipv6 enabled?

no

run ip addr s | grep fe80 to check

sorry , it's enabled

no

and show the output of curl "https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-f27&arch=x86_64"

sorry , it's enabled

Is it working?

It seems not to

it's enabled

it's enabled

http://test-ipv6.com/

is it working or just enabled.

http://test-ipv6.com/

Test here

Test here

i was playing video on vlc during updating my system (fedora27) and suddenly stopped , i tried to remove it and install again many times with no benefit , finally this problem happened..!

i mean that vlc is stopped

i was playing video on vlc during updating my system (fedora27) and suddenly stopped , i tried to remove it and install again many times with no benefit , finally this problem happened..!

Yes, thats why you should use mpv :P

But anyway, is your ipv6 working or not

Also did you reboot

yes reboot many times

and do dnf update --best --allowerasing --refresh -y

yes reboot many times

Does your ipv6 work

still waiting

http://test-ipv6.com/

^

not supported

not supported

Go into the network settings > wifi (or "network > wired" for ethernet) > settings wheel on the wired or wifi connection > IPv6 > disable

Then apply, reconnect

Try mpv player

dnf install mpv rightclick your file, open with mpv

vlc suddenly stop playing videos but still playing mp3

vlc is quite frankly a pretty meh player in everything, including bugs like these

vlc suddenly stop playing videos but still playing mp3

try with mpv

i installed mpv but vlc is my favourite

Does it work in mpv_

yea good

Well use that and wait for another vlc update. It might have broken codecs or ffmpeg version.

If you like vlc more because it has more of a gui install gnome-mpv and use that.

i just want to know the reason of this problem .. i may reinstall fedora because of this..!

i just want to know the reason of this problem .. i may reinstall fedora because of this..!

i"d guess vlc update before ffmpeg update

dont reinstall

i just want to know the reason of this problem .. i may reinstall fedora because of this..!

well you can try vlc as flatpak

well you can try vlc as flatpak

This would be a smart thing to try, good thinking!

or you could see if terminal gives you some input, then report all to the devs

This would be a smart thing to try, good thinking!

thnx GOD ..! now vlc is working well ..

Nice!

just changed output of video in settings and then it worked well

just we need to think out of box Guys

*debian reaping fedoras efforts

Oh okkk

Go open source!! :P

@jflory https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fedora-27-release-party-bengaluru/ This contains a list of new contributors and it will be awesome to have a report of entire APAC for the last 1 year and how we engaged new contributors @SIddharthVipul

@jflory https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fedora-27-release-party-bengaluru/ This contains a list of new contributors and it will be awesome to have a report of entire APAC for the last 1 year and how we engaged new contributors @SIddharthVipul

??? A year in review post would be awesome! I actually have some guidelines for this soon. We did it in 2015, but not 2016. Hope to bring it back this year. More details coming next Monday. :)

Oh okkk

Just for the records: It's not Debian reaping Fedora efforts, is that Debian is completely backed by community while Fedora is backed by Red Hat. Fedora has to follow RH directives and obbey US law. Debian can do whatever they please, they're not tied to a company located in a specific country.

Just for the records: It's not Debian reaping Fedora efforts, is that Debian is completely backed by community while Fedora is backed by Red Hat. Fedora has to follow RH directives and obbey US law. Debian can do whatever they please, they're not tied to a company located in a specific country.

This does make things a lot easier :D

Just for the records: It's not Debian reaping Fedora efforts, is that Debian is completely backed by community while Fedora is backed by Red Hat. Fedora has to follow RH directives and obbey US law. Debian can do whatever they please, they're not tied to a company located in a specific country.

Kohane, they are slowly pulling in all changes that spot made, like being able to only build free codecs that have no patent problems. Yes they are community backed and can include them but their credo and guideline still strongly discourage it.

So yes, it is reaping Fedoras (specifically spots) efforts :P

?

Kohane, they are slowly pulling in all changes that spot made, like being able to only build free codecs that have no patent problems. Yes they are community backed and can include them but their credo and guideline still strongly discourage it.

They always had a repository for non-free stuff. It might discouraged, but the repos were there and you were and are in absolute liberty of using them.

I used Debian some 10 years ago, they always had this.

10 years ago....

Such an old Linux user?

They always had a repository for non-free stuff. It might discouraged, but the repos were there and you were and are in absolute liberty of using them.

Not non free.

Chromium, the explicit open sauce project, still has codecs that are open sauce but have patents restricting their usage

debian is now reaping the effort fo spot to make these open source codecs non-essential when compiling chromium trough flags.

Which restricted chromium being taken upstream in fedora before - and made it "meh but lets add it anyway, nobody can sue us" in debian.

So basically, it's just no longer something they are advised not to do because they don't need to. :)

ERROR: S client not available

Nice.

thats interesting https://www.ibm.com/blogs/think/2017/12/getting-the-world-quantum-ready/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=ibmq&utm_content=ibmqnetwork https://www.research.ibm.com/ibm-q/network/#/

Chromium, the explicit open sauce project, still has codecs that are open sauce but have patents restricting their usage

source, not sauce

source, not sauce

I've heard saying "sauce" instead of "source" is the sort of meme joke

Morning people

For me sauce is something I add to my pasta or pizza

Afternoon @x3mboy

How's everything over there?

debian is now reaping the effort fo spot to make these open source codecs non-essential when compiling chromium trough flags.

Huh? It's already possible to compile distributable chromium binaries

But a browser without h264 sucks big time

How's everything over there?

Quite hot, Summer is coming

Quite hot, Summer is coming

Glad I’m not there, I hate hot weather.

Not non free.

Tobias, I don’t want to get in an argument, but they do have it. Debian has and always had free, non-free and contrib as repositories.

Tobias, I don’t want to get in an argument, but they do have it. Debian has and always had free, non-free and contrib as repositories.

There is no argument. Yes it has, yes you can enable them. But now chromium can be built without h264, thus allowing it to be put into main - and chromium-codecs-freeworld in their closed source repos.

Topicons plus, that doesnt exist anymore.

dnf install gnome-shell-extension-topicons-plus

relogin and enable in tweak tool

(will show in the top bar)

Actually, if I don't install TopIcons, where's the tray now?

Actually, if I don't install TopIcons, where's the tray now?

Vanished

There is no argument. Yes it has, yes you can enable them. But now chromium can be built without h264, thus allowing it to be put into main - and chromium-codecs-freeworld in their closed source repos.

So there's almost no benefit unless you want to use a garbo version of Chromium?

For "freedom"?

So there's almost no benefit unless you want to use a garbo version of Chromium?

Well, if you only use websites which use free codecs like VP9 it'll do

Well, if you only use websites which use free codecs like VP9 it'll do

So very few of them. ?

So very few of them. ?

- YouTube - ...ummm ?

Topicons plus, that doesnt exist anymore.

Thanks

- YouTube - ...ummm ?

:P

So very few of them. ?

Like wikipedia, youtube (90%) and co?

Almost all websites still use h264 though

Almost all websites still use h264 though

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_comment/MP4_Video

VP9 is really a tiny minority