I dont know why you struggle to accept that :P

Are they removing variants? Or just recreating global dark as an "Adwaita-Dark" theme?

The latter

And giving themedevs half a year to make their dark mode themes into a dark theme version instead

Yes, which makes it not only easier to apply and live reload changes but also more scriptable

How is list = get_themes_list() current = get_current_theme() dark = determine_dark_counterpart_through_user_input_or_ai(list, current) set_theme(dark) easier to script than switch()

How is list = get_themes_list() current = get_current_theme() dark = determine_dark_counterpart_through_user_input_or_ai(list, current) set_theme(dark) easier to script than switch()

By allowing the user to set the themes they want in light and dark mode.

which can be entirely different themes

_colors.scss in master right now still has 'light' and 'dark' variant code, so variants haven't yet been removed from Adwaita. https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/gtk/theme/Adwaita/_colors.scss

and you just call themename-dark in your extension

_colors.scss in master right now still has 'light' and 'dark' variant code, so variants haven't yet been removed from Adwaita. https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/gtk/theme/Adwaita/_colors.scss

6 months

and you just call themename-dark in your extension

no guarantee it'll actually be called that

https://jeremy.bicha.net/2017/08/29/gnome-tweaks-3-25-91/#comment-385

I asked for you.

So his response implies that GTK is still maintaining dark mode functionality for software that wants it.

It's just sad to see it go for normal desktop use

It had much potential

What if the switch remained, but did nothing except switch between $(dconf read /org/gnome/desktop/interface/gtk-theme) and $(dconf read /org/gnome/desktop/interface/gtk-theme)-Dark?

What if the switch remained, but did nothing except switch between $(dconf read /org/gnome/desktop/interface/gtk-theme) and $(dconf read /org/gnome/desktop/interface/gtk-theme)-Dark?

inconsistent theme naming

so first check if theme has dark and grey out if not

It had much potential

It now has much more imho.

Exactly. So it's more portable to just pick the theme from a list button.

That - and an auto-switcher allows you to use different themes for night and day if you need, because now all are available as both.

inconsistent theme naming

aaaa, that's exactly the reason the switch should remain

aaaa, that's exactly the reason the switch should remain

No, why?

Gnome dropped it

aaaa, that's exactly the reason the switch should remain

inconsistent variant existence?

gtk will as soon as all bibsns distros get gnome > 3.26

And you are kindly asked to code the functionality if you need it as switch and can't select a theme yourself.

No, why?

because you can always be sure a theme has a dark variant if it has dark.css with different themes, you require some guessing (add -dark) or AI or human interaction to get the dark theme

because you can always be sure a theme has a dark variant if it has dark.css with different themes, you require some guessing (add -dark) or AI or human interaction to get the dark theme

there was never a dark.css

and gnome could enforce a naming scheme.

or a new modifier. "dark-theme-name"

And we are talking about clicking in a tiny list.

over a switch.

both requiring human interaction.

Or setting it up once in an extension.

Cant install teamviewer

dont know what is going wrong

i ve downloaded the rpm package

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/53.0/

there are no rpms

Cant install teamviewer

Can you work around it?

Fedora and Teamviewer dont go well together because you have to disable so much security things.

install firefox-esr or icecat

whould work but there is no esr in fedora repos

shouldn't there be a place where rpm specs from old packages are stored?

Need TeamViewer

Is there anY other oPtion ??

Is there anY other oPtion ??

disabling security significantly, yes.

I want to access a windows PC

shouldn't there be a place where rpm specs from old packages are stored?

There is, but can you give us a reasoning why you need that specific version?

and rdp doesn't work?

I want to access a windows PC

rdp?

or vnc?

Well, Windows provides by default RDP (Remote Desktop Protocol)

NAT you can't get behind.

NAT you can't get behind.

Portforward! XD

That's when Team Viewer can work.

Portforward! XD

I just said "can't get behind".

Portforward! XD

IPv6!

or reverse vnc

How can i connect usinG VNC ?? AnY Guideline ?? Do i need to download AnYthinG ..

TV is easier for people.

How can i connect usinG VNC ?? AnY Guideline ?? Do i need to download AnYthinG ..

*RDP Where is the other pc? In the same network?

Or is it at a friends/family/random peeps house?

No

ERROR: S client not available

No

Well, where is it then

He is so Far awaY From me .. About 600 KM :P

Friend

He is so Far awaY From me .. About 600 KM :P

you can download the .tar from their page

and run it for just accessing your friends pc.

The problems only exist when installing it to run it as remote access

Not rpm ??

Not rpm ??

Yes, no rpm.

Never trust remote sources, never install anything of this security implication permanently.

Ok

does anybody know if and how it's possible to connect to wpa enterprise/PEAP networks with nmcli?

does anybody know if and how it's possible to connect to wpa enterprise/PEAP networks with nmcli?

supposed to

the code is in place, which distro ?

fedora (surprise)

haha, you are adventurous . should work fine

fedora (surprise)

https://major.io/2016/05/03/802-1x-networkmanager-using-nmcli/

https://major.io/2016/05/03/802-1x-networkmanager-using-nmcli/

great, thanks! on a different note, where does nmcli store its configuration if not /etc/NM/sys-connections?

hi

how install this frimware on fedora 26 ?:

[sajjad@localhost ~]$ dmesg | grep -i firmware [ 0.474971] acpi PNP0A08:00: [Firmware Info]: MMCONFIG for domain 0000 [bus 00-3f] only partially covers this bridge [sajjad@localhost ~]$

there are no rpms

It's only binary from Mozilla, you can open it.

If you are okay with windows wiping your uefi from time to time.

It does not wipe it. Last time a saw something like that was due to Windows setting up it own Windows only boot loader, the fedora *.efi file was still there.

GNOME to remove advanced suspend settings and global dark theme from Tweak Tool https://jeremy.bicha.net/2017/08/29/gnome-tweaks-3-25-91/

Please GNOME's Devs, not this meme again.

It does not wipe it. Last time a saw something like that was due to Windows setting up it own Windows only boot loader, the fedora *.efi file was still there.

The uefi entry for it, yes - the /boot can be overwritten by windows tough on update.

The uefi entry for it, yes - the /boot can be overwritten by windows tough on update.

What?

Are you talking about the ESP partition mounted in /boot/efi/ or just the plain ext4 /boot partition?

^ that would be evil as !@#$!

great, thanks! on a different note, where does nmcli store its configuration if not /etc/NM/sys-connections?

I'd suggest you to install nmtui for that to be more convenient next time. :)

Check this .. http://zoomquilt.org

hm