What's a good cross platform format for a pendrive that Freebsd supports

I see fat is no go

Well vfat

What's a good cross platform format for a pendrive that Freebsd supports

Zfs

VFAT and most systems can RW NTFS.

Zfs

troll 👍

troll 👍

What? zfs exist at least for FreeBSD, Linux, MacOS, NetBSD and Windows. Which platforms do you need?

it does?

hell I had trouble installing ext driver on windows, impressive that zfs works on it

Solaris of course too

"Supported operating systems Sun codebase: OpenSolaris, illumos distributions, OpenIndiana Oracle ZFS: Solaris OpenZFS: FreeBSD, Mac OS X Server 10.5 (limited to read-only), NetBSD, Linux via third-party kernel module ("ZFS on Linux")[2] or ZFS-FUSE, OSv"

I do know that exfat was made for flash memory, IDK how well zfs fits on flash memory

I suppose it doesn't matter anymore, no flash out there only readis/writes 8k times

I do know that exfat was made for flash memory, IDK how well zfs fits on flash memory

exfat wa created to be better than fat

mmm

zfs works on usb drives

try ext2 if you need something smaller

"exFAT is a file system introduced by Microsoft in 2006 and optimized for flash memory such as USB flash drives and SD cards."

use exfat then

but does it work on freebsd? vfat didn't work on it

if vfat is older than exfat and it doesn't work, then exfat should not work either

https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?mount.exfat-fuse(8)

read dont assume

https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/mounting-exfat-usb-with-freebsd.84671/

first match on ddg

https://github.com/openzfsonwindows/openzfs/releases * Attempt to fix Notification BSOD

Getting a BSOD for using zfs is imo not worth it

ok, thanks, I'll switch to exfat

read dont assume

I don't think this is unfair, I searched the forum for a solution for mounting fat32lba correctly and everyone talked about just mounting as normal even though it doesn't work.

i found success stories for exfat in seconds

I'm trying to setup a raspberry kiosk mode, but I have a vertical monitor. I've tried everything but can't set XWindow in vertical. I add this line to .xinitrc xrandr --output default --rotate 90 Don't work, change the config.txt to rotate 90 degrees rotates 180. Usinf xrandr with display, different values and options. Don't work. Any new idea?

is fat32lba exfat? I thought it was vfat

also, it seems lots of programs depend on /run but what makes it?

https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/desktop/#desktop-environments mentions vscode but there is no vscode

Can I discuss about exploit

https://indirector.cpusec.org/

🚨 OpenSSH flaws (CVE-2024-6387) allows unauthenticated remote code execution on glibc-based Linux systems. 14 million servers at risk.  ​​​​ pfSense CVE-2024-6387 https://blog.qualys.com/vulnerabilities-threat-research/2024/07/01/regresshion-remote-unauthenticated-code-execution-vulnerability-in-openssh-server https://thehackernews.com/2024/07/new-openssh-vulnerability-could-lead-to.html https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/1dssli8/cve20246387/ https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-6387 OpenBSD: cd /usr/src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd && make && make install service sshd restart FreeBSD: freebsd-update fetch install PfSense package: pfSense update "system_patches": Confirmation Required to upgrade package pfSense-pkg-System_Patches from 2.2.11_13 to 2.2.11_14. Debian: Install 9.8p1 ​​​​on Debian (Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, ...): apt-get update apt-get install build-essential zlib1g-dev libssl-dev libpam0g-dev libselinux1-dev wget https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/archive/refs/tags/V_9_8_P1.tar.gz tar -xzf V_9_8_P1.tar.gz cd openssh-portable-V_9_8_P1 ./configure make make install mv /usr/sbin/sshd /usr/sbin/sshd.bak ln -s /usr/local/sbin/sshd /usr/sbin/sshd systemctl restart sshd

xfce seems to be not capable of logging out

but then again, dbus is not running, which is weird because I installed it, its in rc.conf

https://michal.sapka.me/blog/2024/ladybird-inc/

Bah

Netsurf exists, and many others, nobody wished to use it

Also, I'm pretty sure Mozilla was funding rust because of the problems of c++ at scale

The web also won't be fixed, because the web gets funded via ads, why would you break something that funds your business? Brave tried to get away from it. Flattr was also a solution, but it's not gonna get better

I wouldn't say brave failed, it's the best browser IMO, but, what fuels the web are ads

"fixing the web" doesn't mean getting rid of ads: it only means making sure you don't need at least 8GB of RAM to bloody browse the web

The ad makers don't care, YouTubes ads are video, even YouTube music ads are video, because showing a video is the way to generate more money.

you completely miss the point

like, it flew around 5 meters from you

Take a look at the history / invention of cookies.

Don't be despective

what do the cookies have to do with modern-ish browsers requiring me to have 16 GB of memory and not being pleased with that?

thirty. two. gigabytes. of RAM

to run a bloody browser of bloody web pages

You think I don't know that?

I'm on a laptop, dual core

then what are you talking about?

I'm talking about the reality of the situation

what you are talking about is a different situation

We can all move to gopher, build a farm, sing cumbaya. But that doesn't explain what is actually wrong with browsers. It's not a technical problem but a monetary one

it's also a technical one, though

I disagree on that.

I disagree on that.

what I am saying is, it might be not only a technical issue, but it's not wise to ignore the technical component of it

a browser couldve been built using Xembed, built a pager for html and everything else and link it like you do tabbed and surf and youd have a good browser.

a browser couldve been built using Xembed, built a pager for html and everything else and link it like you do tabbed and surf and youd have a good browser.

what. the. hell. are you saying? I'm using surf rn, but it still requires 8+

That's a webkit problem. What I'm saying here is a browser is for web yes, but they've also removed support for any other protocol that isn't "web" do you can't clean nor can you move anywhere else

If you can't even move away from the protocol, how could a browser ever be better

That's a webkit problem. What I'm saying here is a browser is for web yes, but they've also removed support for any other protocol that isn't "web" do you can't clean nor can you move anywhere else

what is that...

what are you trying to say? That I "can't use email, because they've blocked it"? The f is that.

I'm saying the browser and the web are nothing more than glorified pagers. People who make websites in gopher or gemini or any other protocol are not a part of the browser, what's most important in a browser is not the HTML5 but the URL aspect. If you can't switch to a leaner scheme than http+HTML5+js then you can't move away from the bloated aspect of it

JavaScript itself was slower, we got V8 and so on, but this is all a limitation of html itself, http using cookies is a limitation because there's no good authentication protocol. So it gets bloated and more bloated

You can use Dillo, it's fine, it uses 100mb of ram total, I use it for references. But it doesn't support HTML5

I see you know something, but don't have any idea what any of that means

What don't you know?

I may not be explaining myself clearly

I may not be explaining myself clearly

oh, that's a possibility

The history of cookies surprised me towards how important the monetary aspect of it is. Tracking as well. Even though we are all about how evil it is. Google was built on it.

Take a look at rebol and reds experiments in building a table

I shouldn't blame JavaScript, given rebols experiments

"<OF-TOPIC> Vulnerabilidade critica no ssh. Sei que é off-topic mas afeta todos nós. Segue link com mais detalhes para aplicar correção e fica seguro" 🚨 OpenSSH flaws (CVE-2024-6387) allows unauthenticated remote code execution on glibc-based Linux systems. 14 million servers at risk.  ​​​​ pfSense CVE-2024-6387 https://blog.qualys.com/vulnerabilities-threat-research/2024/07/01/regresshion-remote-unauthenticated-code-execution-vulnerability-in-openssh-server https://thehackernews.com/2024/07/new-openssh-vulnerability-could-lead-to.html https://www.reddit.com/r/PFSENSE/comments/1dssli8/cve20246387/ https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-6387 OpenBSD: cd /usr/src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd && make && make install service sshd restart FreeBSD: freebsd-update fetch install PfSense package: pfSense update "system_patches": Confirmation Required to upgrade package pfSense-pkg-System_Patches from 2.2.11_13 to 2.2.11_14. Debian: Install 9.8p1 ​​​​on Debian (Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, ...): update CVE Debian: https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-6387 apt update sudo apt install --upgrade openssh-server openssh-sftp-server openssh-client Ou sudo aptitude update sudo aptitude safe-upgrade -y sudo aptitude clean sudo aptitude autoclean sudo apt autoremove -y