Anonymous
there were too many issues that i could not fix because they had to do with the compiler
Anonymous
so i just stopped using it and went back to 14
Anonymous
granted i always use the GNU standard
Anonymous
and have a few gnu extensions enabled in my codes
Roxifλsz 🇱🇹
there were too many issues that i could not fix because they had to do with the compiler
Were they just problems with the maturity of the code in the compiler? Has it gotten any better now?
Ибраги́м
so i just stopped using it and went back to 14
I don't even remember which is which anylonger until compiler tells me: "hey, that's 2017, you're using 2014"
Anonymous
Were they just problems with the maturity of the code in the compiler? Has it gotten any better now?
in the actual standard implemented i think they might be
Anonymous
some of the bugs i had with the standard in g++ have not been fixed yet
Anonymous
by just a little
Anonymous
when clang constantly gets faster then gnu i will move to clang
Ибраги́м
and have a few gnu extensions enabled in my codes
It took me some time to know that:
int func(auto x); x declaration here is a GCC extension NOT Standard
Anonymous
It took me some time to know that:
int func(auto x); x declaration here is a GCC extension NOT Standard
i believe this is available in 17
Anonymous
could be wrong?
Ибраги́м
GCC is still the overall King
Ибраги́м
Even tho I respect Clang for the better error messages and tooling
Anonymous
still will have to be over 20 years from now
Anonymous
weird
Anonymous
will check later
Ибраги́м
still will have to be over 20 years from now
Competition is good for end users and it even makes the ecosystem better
Anonymous
i hate the gnu source code standards
Ибраги́м
That's why you should use Clang also during developement
Ибраги́м
Just to be sure
Anonymous
like how they normally
Anonymous
That's why you should use Clang also during developement
have you ever tried to link files that were made with different versions of gcc before?
Ибраги́м
have you ever tried to link files that were made with different versions of gcc before?
From GCC5 and upwards it works
Anonymous
clang also does not let me go with cuda code
Anonymous
and we have a bunch of self compiled cuda code
Ибраги́м
It's NOT advisable to do 4.9 and 5(above). version 4 should work with one another
Anonymous
i have to also use g++ 5.4 for my jetson tx2
Ибраги́м
i have to also use g++ 5.4 for my jetson tx2
If those CUDA are linked with GCC 4.9 or below, u guys will have a time bomb steadily ticking
Anonymous
If those CUDA are linked with GCC 4.9 or below, u guys will have a time bomb steadily ticking
oh i had that experience
Ибраги́м
If those CUDA are linked with GCC 4.9 or below, u guys will have a time bomb steadily ticking
'cos of the new CXX11 string ABI use
Anonymous
one dev somehow managed to have gcc 4.8
Anonymous
i have no idea how
Anonymous
because he was using standard ubuntu install
Anonymous
explain?
Anonymous
ya those cxx11 api warnings are a mess
Anonymous
it solves a simple problem in a really stupid way
Anonymous
fun fact i once made a bitcoin like cryptocurrency
Anonymous
that i sold to some weed distrutors for 75k
Anonymous
which they ended up not using
Anonymous
so i do not fully know if it would have worked in real world applications or not
Anonymous
not using blockchain at all
Anonymous
no not what it solves
Anonymous
the original problem they solved is a very small subsection of decentralization
Anonymous
it is not
Ибраги́м
NoSQL was the future, huh ?
Anonymous
blockchain is too ineffective and is mostly to be used as a timing mechanism
Anonymous
bitcoin and cryptocurrencies are all ponzi schemes
Anonymous
you just have to be faster then everyone else
Anonymous
the only thing that blockchaining is actually used for is making a very transparent map of who touched it with the time associated with it
Anonymous
no this is what blockchaining that algorithm is designed to do
Anonymous
decentralized currency will not work anymore because it would hurt too many people in the higher up areas
Anonymous
and they will not allow that
Anonymous
if anything they will buy it up make the price go insanely high
Anonymous
then just sell everything to short circuit that price so it becomes 0
Anonymous
and then everyone invested in it gets 0 dollars back
Ибраги́м
decentralized currency will not work anymore because it would hurt too many people in the higher up areas
Blockchain will | is explored other than cryptos
Anonymous
and the main reason it is is because investors know nothing
Anonymous
you say blockchain fast enough they throw money at you
Ибраги́м
There;s always an investor | investors
Anonymous
ya but that does not mean they will be enough to really make a difference
Anonymous
cryptos are a nice concept that will never really get to a position they will be self suffiecent
Anonymous
especially with how most of these exchanges work