Am lost lol

The game engine under fortnite is called Unreal Engine (UE)

Can we chat privately please?

Please

C++ is the best for that

Bur it costs too much efforts

Can we chat privately please?

No PMs. My TG is already flooded.

Bur it costs too much efforts

Financially?

No PMs. My TG is already flooded.

Ok bro

Try cocos2d

Please

Anybody here using npp?

Games like fortnite ?

Fortnite is based on the Unreal Engine 4 , which is basing on C++ you can also use their blueprints (graphical coding ) i would say it is a little bit easyer than c++ and there are a lot of tutorials for that too

Fortnite is based on the Unreal Engine 4 , which is basing on C++ you can also use their blueprints (graphical coding ) i would say it is a little bit easyer than c++ and there are a lot of tutorials for that too

but a game is so much more than only coding , you ned also 3D modelling ( included UV mapping , rigging and animate ) texturing your models and create materials ( bumb, gamma maps etc ) and way more

Who have time to review a small code in C++?

Who have time to review a small code in C++?

You may upload the code to github and post the link here

Hi members, which is the best book for learning c++?. Need a copy please

Take any book of balaguru

Hi members, which is the best book for learning c++?. Need a copy please

Master in c++ is a also best book ,written by venugopal

Yes Ofcourse

Criminal

Hi !

I wanted to as ask a noob question

What are optimal ways to reduce the main() function lenght in lines of code ?

I wanted to create external functions that would be accessed from main in order to modularize the code, but I might require too many variables from the local scope of main, and there's no way to set the scope of a function to be the one of another function ( in this case, main() )

Although I could pass some of this local variables from main by reference with arguments, there are too many : /

What are optimal ways to reduce the main() function lenght in lines of code ?

Well if you want your main function to be as short as possible, func(){ program; } void main(){ func(); }

It's generally a better idea to just have different processes in different function, instead of all being clumped into main

like void main(){ dothing(); dosecondthing(); dosomething(); }

Yes yes, I have many functions in main()

but I still have big chunks of code which rely on many local variables, are there any ways to "modularize" those ?

You can make variable as global also

If it's just going to be ditched in a day, should be ok to write hackathon-style code(unreadable after a day), else have proper functions that do different tasks like zeta(); Gamma(); digamma(); eucliddiv(); int main(){ while(something){ do something with the functions } return 0; }

Thanks @Ariana1729

You can make variable as global also

So far this alternative seems to be working, although I want to have as few global variables as possible... : /

So far this alternative seems to be working, although I want to have as few global variables as possible... : /

Yes it can work

i almost never use global variables tbh, I'll just set them as input to functions

i almost never use global variables tbh, I'll just set them as input to functions

You must work with global variable also

It can help in complex multi function problem

I'm mainly just using global variables as problem parameters, most of the time I prefer local variables, less dangerous and easier to play with

Most of the time I do weird pointer stuff that are basically global variables

I'm mainly just using global variables as problem parameters, most of the time I prefer local variables, less dangerous and easier to play with

How dangerous?

Most of the time I do weird pointer stuff that are basically global variables

It may be another approach

How dangerous?

Well you gain access to almost every function(from an attack viewpoint)

Well you gain access to almost every function(from an attack viewpoint)

Hmm..

hMM it's ok i will reset it after sometime :)

Cool cool

In most cases I would suggest against using non-const global variables, in many cases they make the code more defect-prone. By using a good software architecture you barely need them

Also multi-threading

In most cases I would suggest against using non-const global variables, in many cases they make the code more defect-prone. By using a good software architecture you barely need them

Not always ,on some problems it can helpful

Most of the time the global variables dont change

Global variables work like a charm if you don't care the executable size

Global variables work like a charm if you don't care the executable size

Yes

Guys, I need UE4(Unreal Engine4), please Give it to me If You can please

Guys, I need UE4(Unreal Engine4), please Give it to me If You can please

donwload epic luancher and install UE

I don't know why people avoid global variables. Executable size ? memory? security?

Can't you load it?

Because global are visible throughout the compilation unit. Any code in it may modify non-const globals.

I don't know why people avoid global variables. Executable size ? memory? security?

global variables initialization order between multiple translation unit is unspecified

Furthermore globals tend to decrease the code's maintainability. Working on large code bases, the wrong usage of globals can introduce several problems

I don't know why people avoid global variables. Executable size ? memory? security?

For me - Size, security, can easily be replaced with local

I googled it and it is all about defensive style

Hum, code-style question... should main() be the first function of the code ?

It's not necessary it can be later

Yes, but, is it more professional ?

It doesn't matter where it is, even if it is at the end of the code it is the first function that is done

I think so

Is there C++ gurus))?

I came across with some close source code from vendor and it is not possible to find the main function

So if I declare "int black = 10;" outside the main function, I can access that variable from inside the main()

But it seems that I can't access that variable from a function called from main()

Is that normal ?

Hum, code-style question... should main() be the first function of the code ?

it's normally my last

Is that normal ?

Yup

Look up global and local variables

Uhm... is it possible to declare a "super-global-variable" ?

as in?

Uhm... is it possible to declare a "super-global-variable" ?

Well, global is about as global as you can get. You could create a .bin file and append information to the bin.

Is that normal ?

The only way to access a variable from the "parent function" is closures.

The only way to access a variable from the "parent function" is closures.

I'll check this

So... there's no way to give access a function called from main() to the global variables in the code ?

But it seems that I can't access that variable from a function called from main()

Are you declaring your variable in a function or separately?

Are you declaring your variable in a function or separately?

Separately, outside main()